Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hester in line for £9.6m to turn around ailing RBS

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 June 2009
ROYAL Bank of Scotland boss Stephen Hester has been awarded a controversial £9.6 million pay package to turn around the ailing bank, it
emerged today. Details of the package for the Edinburgh-based firm's chief executive have been agreed by shareholders at a time when thousands of RBS staff are facing job cuts as a result of Mr Hester's strategic review.

The package has caused outrage among taxpayers, as more than 70 per cent of the firm is controlled by the Government, meaning the deal is effectively being funded by the taxpayer.

The pay package was agreed on Friday following a meeting between chairman Sir Philip Hampton and UK Financial Investments, which controls the Government's stakes in RBS, and other top 20 shareholders.

It consists of a £1.2m-a-year salary and a projected £2m of annual non-cash bonus payments.

But the most controversial part of the deal is close to £6.4m of long-term share and stock option awards if the bank's share price rises to 70p. It opened today at 37.2p.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "I have got no problem with people in private banks being paid whatever shareholders want. But when the majority of a bank is owned by the taxpayer, as RBS is, this is way more than should be paid."

The actions of banks had come under huge public scrutiny at the time of the Government's rescue deals, with tales of extravagant hospitality and spending.

But the attention has in recent weeks turned to politicians and the expenses scandal.

Mr Elliott said he hopes further focus is now put on RBS and the Lloyds Banking Group.

He said: "I hope this shakes things up a bit and puts the focus back on the state-owned banks.

"Bonuses, pensions and corporate hospitality happening in banks all need to be scrutinised properly."

The performance-related deal is said to be in line with other bosses in private banks. However, it differs starkly from other public sector-backed banks.

Lloyds' chief executive, Eric Daniels, is paid an annual £1m basic salary, plus a maximum of 200 per cent of salary, or £2m, as a long-term incentive. Mr Hester's deal comes in at more than treble that.

In the United States, Citigroup chief executive Vikram Pandit agreed to work for £1 a year and no bonus until it returns to profitability as part of the terms of the bank's bail-out.

However, banking insiders today defended the pay deal, pointing out that if the share price rises to 70p, Mr Hester will have achieved a huge turnaround in the fortunes of the bank, which was close to being brought to his knees before the Government stepped in.

"He would have taken the share price from a 10p low at one stage to a 70p high," said one industry insider. "That is a 700 per cent increase.

"The Government would make an £8 billion profit by the time the share price hits 70p."


The full article contains 515 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 June 2009 9:42 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

simonp,

22/06/2009 12:06:32
"The package has caused outrage among taxpayers, as more than 70 per cent of the firm is controlled by the Government, meaning the deal is effectively being funded by the taxpayer" only if 1) you are a memebr of a small interest group and 2) you know nothing about company law
2

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 22/06/2009 12:07:28
Another Press release from the self appointed Taxpayers' Alliance getting picked up and reported as news. "The package has caused outrage among taxpayers". Ah, the human angle covered too!
3

ZipptJeffrey,

Castle 22/06/2009 12:14:17
Has RBS not learned anything?! Was it not insane bonuses that led to risk taking in the first place?

RBS is a lost cause. Anyone with common sense will be closing all their accounts they have with RBS.

And that £9.6 million is taxpayers money. RBS need to be taken to court over this.
4

,

22/06/2009 12:17:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Julien Donkey Kong,

22/06/2009 13:03:05
He looks like Richard Attenborough in "10 Rillington Place"
6

Andy1,

22/06/2009 13:12:05
#3

Don't be daft.

This isn't the same as cash bonuses for short term performance.

This is in line with what most people wanted to see, rewards for long term performance that are linked to shareholder value.

This is a headline figure which is the maximum that could be paid out in long term incentives only if a certain number of conditions are met.

IF these conditons were emt and he got that total figure at the end then no, he would not be getting this at the expense of the taxpayer. He will just have helped the taxpayer to an £8bn profit.

As for this being 'contraversial'. That's not really true. The governement through the UKFI have sanctioned this, politicans are supportive of it and only the media are trying to present this is something else.

The Scotsman's hadlines and spin these days is a bit more akin to the tabloids!



7

,

22/06/2009 13:12:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Julien Donkey Kong,

22/06/2009 13:26:32
Bio-chemical weapons Tester

City of Manchester

Uncle Fester

Polytechnic of Leicester

Dolly Parton's chest, ah

Ma erm's in plester

Lemon zester
9

Julien Donkey Kong,

22/06/2009 13:27:08
Baldy banker
10

,

22/06/2009 13:30:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

The Ayrshire Bard,

22/06/2009 13:49:47
I can only guess that dealing with huge amounts of cash has a strange effect upon banker's brains and they soon start to believe the mega salaries and bonuses are their rightful entitlement. This guy is no more than a state employee but is allowed to earn about six times more than his boss, the PM.
It's a funny old world!!
12

Jim I,

Edinburgh 22/06/2009 13:56:03
Unfortunately £8 billion is only scratching the surface of the gargatuan debt RBS owes. His salary is obscene in the current financial climate, especially when RBS have helped to bankrupt this country for generations to come. I hope all profits from RBS are fed back into the UK coffers until the bank pays its way again.
13

E Rhodes,

Edinburgh 22/06/2009 15:23:09
We have to accept that we live in a world of corruption and that this type of thing happens.
No point in complaining because nothing every happens. This sort of thing we heard was supposed to stop but, hey,if politicians can screw us why not bankers?

Whether he gets the shareprice to 70p( a tenth of what it should be) is neither here nor there, he will walkway a millionaire.

Welcome to Britain.
14

Dragonlord,

22/06/2009 18:53:00
1.2 Million is a good wage just for turning up, 2 million bonus is a disgrace( why is it more than his wages?) 6.4 Million insentive. So wage + bonus isn't going to get him out of bed in the morning, so we need to pay him more?

Right here's your remit. Sack as many as you can get away with and pocket a wad.
Time to stop the madness and get back to paying basic wages to do the job you applied for.
15

animmo,

22/06/2009 21:38:10
I'll do it for half! Seriously though, NOBODY is so knowledgeable or effective as to warrant this, and that's before the bonuses. People know what to do though - leave RBS
16

Smasher,

23/06/2009 08:50:23
This man has the job of turning round a huge bank which employs thousands of people. I would imagine it's a bit complicated doing this sort of work and requires expert skills. Ronaldo ( that Portuguese pansy ) kicks a ball around a football pitch and gets paid more than this guy. No one complains about that. The world has gone bananas. I'm moving to Mars.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.