Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Taxpayers hand over £350,000 to meet cost of relocated civil servants

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 March 2007
TAXPAYERS have paid more than £350,000 to subsidise the travel of civil servants who have been relocated out of Edinburgh, it emerged today.
Staff who choose to carry on working for Scottish Executive agencies which have transferred out of Edinburgh qualify to have their fares paid for up to five years.

It means, for example, that employees of transport agency Transport Scotland, can
catch the train every day from Edinburgh to Glasgow at taxpayers' expense.

Official figures, released under freedom of information legislation, show that a total of £174,312 was paid in excess fares allowances to employees of relocated quangos in 2005-06, and a further £176,549 in the first eight months of 2006-07.

Transport Scotland alone paid a total of £24,307 to 19 staff in 2005-06 and another £68,950 to 61 staff this year.

The Scottish Public Pensions Agency, now based in Galashiels, paid £54,723 to 26 staff in 2005-06 and a further £43,160 to 20 employees this year.

HM Inspectorate of Education, which saw posts relocated to Livingston, Clydebank and Ayrshire, paid out £38,261 to 28 staff in 2005-06 and another £24,599 to 25 staff this year.

Tory MSP Brian Monteith, convener of the Scottish Parliament's audit committee, said the figures simply reinforced the criticisms of the relocation policy made in the committee's report earlier this month.

The committee highlighted the fact that more than half the 2432 jobs to leave the Capital so far had simply been moved to Glasgow.

Mr Monteith said: "There is nothing to be gained from moving jobs from Edinburgh city centre to Glasgow city centre, when the same employees simply commute at taxpayers' expense.

"The real benefit to job dispersal comes when new jobs are created, and that is best done when new departments or agencies are set up.

"The relocation policy has been completely botched and members of all parties openly accept that. It must be a high priority for the next Scottish Executive."

And he said lessons should be learned for the next round of relocation decisions, currently in the pipeline.

"Moving the Scottish Arts Council to Glasgow and calling it Creative Scotland will probably do nothing more than increase transport costs and help property developers out west," he said.

Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Labour MSP Susan Deacon also criticised the costs.

She said: "I have no difficulty with appropriate arrangements for staff who have been relocated, but this is further evidence that the costs of relocation are substantial.

"And I'm sure many people would feel this money could be put to better use.

"It just underlines the concerns that have been expressed by so many of us, including most recently the parliament's audit committee, that the Executive needs to think again about its approach."

An Executive spokesman said the excess fare scheme was good for the operational efficiency of organisations because it allowed people to continue in their posts after relocation.

And he said the fact that staff were commuting to the new location did not undermine the intended benefits of the dispersal policy, because the areas where agencies moved to would still see wider economic gains.



The full article contains 543 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 March 2007 12:33 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Public bodies relocation
 
1

Miss Jean Brodie,

27/03/2007 14:31:03

ha ha ha ha ha - next they’ll be wanting to build rail links and trams - easy routes for civil servants to get to the airport - increase flight numbers and all the shenanigans

what’s that? It’s already being done ! ha ha ha ha !

What a wurld o farce we aw live in eh?

2

Steve99,

Ya couldnae make it up 27/03/2007 15:57:36

nothing surprises me anyone about these lazy parasites.

If there is a chance for a civil servant or council employee to dip into public funds to line their own pockets, then they will do it!

No shame.....

3

Groucho,

27/03/2007 16:21:11

Travelling from Edinburgh to Glasgow every day ,on your own time, simply to do the same job you did in Edinburgh is hardly "lining your own pockets". It's realy 3 hours a day of unpaid overtime.

4

martin001,

27/03/2007 16:27:14

steve99,
how exactly are they "lining their pockets"?
If you are forced to move offices and this results in an increase in time / cost of your commute then you are entitled for the difference in compensation for at least 3 years. This is the case with private and public companies. Of course that wouldn't back up your pathetic whingeing so you might as well just ignore the fact it is a common practice in all companies.

5

,

27/03/2007 20:51:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

hypertension,

27/03/2007 22:18:51

The SNP recognises that Edinburgh, a name of English extraction has NO reason to be Westminster's appointed capital in Scotland.

The Edinburgh lot have been bought by having government jobs planted there by London.

Real Scotland, unite! We need the jobs in Glasgow, a REAL Scottish city.

The time is right. Ditch the East. Proper Scotland must come together.

If Edinburgh must join with its true people in England, then so be it. Scotland must be rid of this economic blight to survive.

If it wasn't for Edinburgh - and its apparent economic success- sucking the life blood from Scotland, all of Scotland would thrive.

7

bill inch,

edinburgh 28/03/2007 01:02:10

Hypertension This drivel you porport A city that is sucking Scottish funds at a rate that is disproportionate to its controbution to the public fund. Freeloader (Scottish capital) you mean.

8

martin001,

28/03/2007 08:45:55

#6,
children aren't employed by the school, patients aren't employed by the hospital.
Think about what you are going to say before writing complete drivel.
Its the EMPLOYEES of the companies we are talking about.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.