Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Give us back our forgotten footbridge over Waverley

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 May 2009
IT WAS built in the late 19th century to replace an ancient road that used to link the city's Old Town and Leith Walk before the opening of Waverley Station.
The footbridge, which linked Jeffrey Street to Calton Road, was 'temporarily' closed by British Rail in 1950 and has never reopened.

Now station owner Network Rail wants to dismantle the remains as part of its £130 million revamp of Waverley's r
oof, prompting local campaigners to start a bid to have it rebuilt.

Some supports and parts of the entrance of the footbridge still remain at the Calton Road entrance to the station, and the bridge itself still extends under Waverley's roof.

It is hoped that rebuilding the old bridge can improve links between the Old Town and the revamped St James Centre and Leith beyond.

The bridge was one of the conditions of an act of parliament allowing the creation of a rebuilt Waverley in 1892. The new station was built over Leith Wynd, an important trading route that dated back to the 16th century.

Canongate resident and transport researcher Jolin Warren has formed the Rebridge the Gap campaign and

is urging people to write to city planners considering Network Rail's planning application by the deadline of 15 May.

He said: "It is something which has frustrated me for a while now but with the planning application for the new roof going in I just thought it was now or never.

"It is a rather circuitous route from the Canongate to Leith Walk and I think it presents a really good opportunity to create a new link in the city centre. A footbridge between Jeffrey Street and Calton Road is required by the North British Railway (Waverley Station.) Act of 1891, so there is also a legal dimension."

Network Rail last month unveiled plans to replace the station's roof. New images showed how its 17,000 cloudy, wired safety-glass panels would be replaced with clear, strengthened glass, allowing more natural light in.

Councillor Joanna Mowatt said the proposal was worth considering: "This is an issue which came up during the consultation over Caltongate, the links across the Waverley valley are important because there are not too many ways to get from the Old Town to the New Town.

"There is a strong argument for bringing back what was Leith Wynd – it is a long way round if you are on either side at where the bridge was."

A spokeswoman for Network Rail said it would consider the proposal once a formal request had been submitted.





The full article contains 434 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

AlanW,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 11:38:18
"The footbridge, which linked Jeffrey Street to Calton Road" - Nope wrong again. It's certainly not linked from Jeffrey Street, Market Street possibly. As a newspaper that used to own a building directly opposite where they are talking about they really should be better informed about local street names.
2

mad moo,

edinburgh 05/05/2009 11:40:09
What a pity Joanna Mowatt chose to ignor the importance of reinstating this link which many objectors commented on and which organisations like SOOT and the Cockburn highlighted as absolutely necessary for the sucess of any development to be undertaken in the Waverley Valley.

The Malcom Frazer building promoted in Caltongate, and the new Council HQ for that matter, could have been designed to ensure this vital link to the Canongate was reinstated and create a real benefit to the whole community.

Time for CEC to have a serious look at proposals which have been put forward from the community.

See the Alternative Strategy which CEC refused to give any consideration to when the Caltongate Masterplan was put out for consultation at www.eh8.org.uk
3

mad moo,

edinburgh 05/05/2009 11:43:08
Look at the pics AlanW and I think you'll find it linked with Jeffrey St and went OVER East Market St.
Had to be removed in 60's due to big plant building being placed on this route in the Station grounds.
4

mad moo,

edinburgh 05/05/2009 11:46:13
Pic on scran
http://www.scran.ac.uk/database/record.php?usi=000-000-043-702

5

Dunaskin,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 12:13:31
This could be an attractive and useful link from the rebuilt St James Quarter and the Eastern New Town to the Canongate (and whatever Caltongate redevelopment does happen down there) and to Holyrood.
6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/05/2009 12:24:28
It was closed because of a series of incidents of what we would call today "antisocial behaviour", and then, as now, authorities were not averse to reducing amenity rather than tackling the cause of problems.

And isn't the bulk of it still in place?

I suspect it will fall into the classic modern day planning trap: it would be unsafe to simply rebuild as it was; if it was to be replaced then the new bridge would have to be built according to modern standards of accessibility and safety; to do so would be prohibitively expensive; so nothing gets done.
7

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 12:49:07
#3 - what pics?
8

jambali,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 13:05:46
It definitely crossed Market Street & joined Jeffrey Street. It definitely did not close in 1950! I used it frequently and wasn't even born in 1950! Usual poor standards of journalistic research by EEN.
9

ReBridge the Gap,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 13:23:33
If you want to support the campaign, go to http://www.reBridgeTheGap.org.uk for contact details, a sample letter, and full background on the route.

Cheers,
Jolin
10

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 05/05/2009 13:52:46
This would be a reinstatement of a disgusting piece of Victorian clutter that deprives the station below of light and ruins the profile of the roof. Not missed by many and a guaranteed mugger's paradise that will be avoided by all but the bravest of souls. Better to get rid of it and have people use the existing route through the station.

Already the station concourse and views of the Edwardian station building has been spoiled by the retention of the hideous mezzanine walkway which has no beauty or grace and has been retained to appease those who wanted to keep it just because it was old.
A modern structure would have been much more beautiful and would have enabled the character of the building, currently obscured, to be appreciated.
11

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/05/2009 14:05:27
#11 Not sure I follow you, but then I'm not sure you were trying particularly hard to make sense...

In your first para you say people should use the existing route through the station, and in the second you suggest the removal of the walkway which provides half of that route!
12

Andrew,

CUMBERNAULD 05/05/2009 14:28:51
HORROR OF HORRORS! Public access 'over and above' Waverley?
Some perfectly innocent person or rail enthusiast might just want/decide take some LEGITIMATE pictures from this public footbridge (should it ever reopen)! That would never do - as the Network Rail "jobsworths" at Waverley would throw a flaky! They usually do, despite the taking of pictures on railway 'property' for personal use, being TOTALLY LEGAL!!!
13

Incandescent,

05/05/2009 14:59:23
#11 Wow! You managed to refrain from using your favourite expression, "peak oil" one single time during that diatribe! Impressive.
14

Deez Nuts,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 15:12:42
UNfortunately duncan is right. Too much planning and restrictions in the uk, if it did get built expect the cost to be about 45 million pounds !!
15

me150,

05/05/2009 15:35:47
This is not needed but wanted by a bunch of historic, or is that ancient, people. It would serve no real purpose and likely cost millions.

Bad idea, scrap what is left and build a new roof.
16

Deez Nuts,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 15:37:14
16 its actually a nice idea. But no chance whatsoever until it actually GOES somewhere .

calton road at the moment ? cant for the life of me see a point to it.
17

Amenemhat,

05/05/2009 15:44:43
#15 that would be network rails problem, lets get a big proper foot bridge and make it something to be proud of
18

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/05/2009 16:02:38
#17 It would come out at the Calton Road entrance to Waverley, which is two minutes walk from some of the biggest office blocks in the city, not to mention the biggest department store in Scotland!
19

Jamesbuchanan66,

05/05/2009 17:05:30
Would this not just be another bridge for folk to jump off?
20

Whopitt,

05/05/2009 17:47:02
What about extending the existing brige as far as East Market street with new access links down inside the station. The reduced cost of building a smaller structure might be enough to make the project viable. It would also reduce some of the congestion at the existing Market Street entrance.
21

Joseph Bloggs,

Edinburgh 05/05/2009 18:13:39
Tell them that you want to rebridge the gap as an optional route for the new trams. Im sure if its unneeded causes unforseen problems with poor planning and you can guarantee to go way way over budget the powers that be will be sold on the idea and throw millions o poonds your way.
22

Andrew,

05/05/2009 20:16:36
21) Agreed - but jump FROM!!!
23

tumshie heid,

05/05/2009 21:00:28
I recall my grandad (retired traindriver)telling me that the bridge was closed after a woman was attacked.
No doubt there were many other similar incidents that led to its closure.
24

Julian.,

edinburgh 05/05/2009 23:47:57
#15,

Does that mean it would be fortunate if Duncan was wrong;-)
25

M Laing,

Old Town 06/05/2009 00:27:40
I've always thought it rather ridiculous that this direct route from the Old Town to Leith Walk exists but cannot be used, and I had hoped that the opportunity would be taken during Waverley's revamp to reinstate it. I live in St. Mary's Street, and getting to the St. James Centre or Leith Walk on foot involves a considerable detour. While reopening the walkway over the station might raise accessibility issues, these would surely be no worse than the present route through the station which involves stairs at either end, or via New Street and Calton Road, which isn't a place you'd want to be alone after dark. I think the campaign to reinstate the walkway is a campaign well worth supporting, and I hope it succeeds.

Incidentally, #1: the walkway did indeed go from Jeffrey Street to Calton Road. A short section of different railings and stonework can be seen in Jeffrey Street directly opposite the end of the walkway.
26

Buttress,

06/05/2009 06:26:55
I agree, an idea well worth investigating/supporting, although I also hope that the current plan for the station revamp can go ahead without hindrance and isn't derailed (sorry!) while the feasibility of this is explored.



27

gwpmason,

FALKIRK 06/05/2009 11:40:21
It's a nice idea but with planning and safety problems. I was told it was closed because it was a haunt of prostitutes and other undesirable characters, and obviously couldn't be patrolled on a sensible basis. It does look odd at the Calton Road end, certainly, but as it hasn't been used for 50 years or more, who will miss it now, and how many would actually use it on a regular basis?
28

Buttress,

06/05/2009 15:14:41
It would seem that this is a legal requrement that a way is provided.

Other stations have this sort of overpass, so why not Waverley?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.