Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Baby boom where marriage doesn't matter



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 March 2008
SCOTLAND is in the midst of a "baby boom" with the number of births reaching a ten-year high – and almost half the babies were born out of wedlock, according to figures released yesterday.
More than 57,000 births were registered last year, 2,000 up on the previous year and the highest annual total since 1997. It was the fifth consecutive rise.

Provisional statistics from Duncan Macniven, the Register General for Scotland, show 49.1
per cent of last year's births were to unmarried parents.

The number of couples walking up the aisle is nearing its lowest level since Victorian times. Last year saw 29,866 marriages, 32 fewer than the previous year.

Last night counselling and family mediation experts said the figures reflected social trends but said children were not necessarily disadvantaged if their parents were unwed.

Sue Maxwell, principal for sexual and relationship therapy at Relate Scotland, said: "While these figures are interesting, they don't give us a real flavour of the different constellations of family life which exist.

"Society has changed drastically. There is now less need to make a public statement – partly caused by people having 'dislocated' from their families and living further away.

"But people are aware that when you become a couple you don't necessarily choose to demonstrate it by making a big statement. Everyone knows you are in a relationship.

"But getting married or having a civil partnership is going on to the next stage and you make a bigger commitment, engaging with a wider audience." Ms Maxwell said some couples were put off marrying because of unsuccessful past relationships, seeing the break-up of their parents' marriage, or fearing loss of freedom or equality.

Gay Cox, of Family Mediation Scotland, said she was not surprised by the figures. "From our point of view, children in a happy family where the parents are not together will tend to do better than those in an unhappy but intact family.

"If married couples stay together just 'for the sake of the children', but the children are caught in the parental conflict and witnessing the warfare between the adults, it can lead to problems educationally and socially, and to low self-esteem.

"We also have to remember that there is no way of monitoring how relationships between unmarried couples end up. We can make the assumption that relationship breakdown between unmarried couples will be at least equal to married couples but we don't know. What we can say is that as many people are getting together and having babies as ever."

Peter Kearney, director of the Scottish Catholic Media Office, said: "For the last ten years this government has penalised married couples by moves such as cutting the married couples' allowance and altering the tax and benefits system, which is appalling and short-sighted."

Soaring costs force wedding cancellations

THE rising cost of weddings explains why more than 100,000 engaged couples in Britain will probably never walk down the aisle, a report released today reveals.

Brides-to-be are demanding the perfect wedding and insisting on extravagant luxuries for the ceremony, causing costs to rocket.

Couples are now twice as likely to postpone their marriage than their parents' generation – with money problems being the main cause of delay.

The report, from the bank ING Direct, shows these financial concerns are well-founded. Twenty years ago couples paid on average £4,300 for their wedding, yet today this stands at £18,500 – a rise of more than five times the rate of inflation.

Costs are so high that one in six engaged couples do not think they will ever marry.

A quarter of couples now opt for luxuries such as fireworks, string quartets or ice sculptures. Other indulgences that have emerged in the last 20 years include flying the family abroad to marry in an exotic location or hiring a castle.



The full article contains 652 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 March 2008 11:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Pregnancy and birth
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/03/2008 00:23:32
About time to!
But it 'saddens me', in the sense..these,..,
"baby boom" babies are being Born to our immigrants!
The Scottish People, don't want Babies anymore, its like,
'To much Hassle' or 'Baby' don't fit into their,
'lifestyle'
Never thought I might be ashamed to be Scottish!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/03/2008 00:25:50
NO! I am not a racist, it is however,..'Sad-Fact'!!
3

Guga II,

Rockall 14/03/2008 03:08:52
And how many of these babies being born are to young mothers who have a kid so that they can jump the queue for getting a council house, then live off the social and don't have to worry about getting a job?
4

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 14/03/2008 06:35:26
Far too many humans on this planet. Limit families to two per couple and we might just survive as a species.
5

Douglas,

Bathgate 14/03/2008 07:35:45
#4: Dragonhead will think you're some kind of liberal, doubling the allowance laid down by his masters.
6

Derick fae Yell,

The Flu Hoose 14/03/2008 08:54:21
"Gay Cox, of Family Mediation Scotland"

Great name!! Send for the bishops!


7

Guga II,

Rockall 14/03/2008 09:35:42
#6 Good one, I missed that.
8

,

14/03/2008 13:34:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

sam the god,

14/03/2008 15:28:11
#8

doreen back to your original name i see
10

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

14/03/2008 17:32:06
8...Wrong Sam...Doreen was my original name but each time I have been moderated it has changed...obiously...any more allegations of being a troll you would like to lay against me?....I am hoping that I have made it perfectly clear the reasons for my alternating between 'Doreen' and 'Horrible Cankers'..
11

sam the god,

14/03/2008 20:16:24
#10 doreen, horrible canker or whatever you want to call yourself next time i was right there was a common theme that made me think you were the same person going to the pub now but you can eleberate on the allegations of being a troll next maybe tommorow or next week sounds intresting.
12

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

14/03/2008 20:51:29
11.....Best place for you Sam...sounds like the pub has come to you already...you are the one making the allegations..

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.