Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Scottish Budget: Key policy plans laid out

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 February 2008
BUSINESS RATES
This is the SNP's long-promised "small business bonus" package, which will reduce or remove an annual £150 million in business rates from 120,000 small firms.

The scheme will cut the rates burden for firms with properties whose combined rateable
value is £15,000 or less.

For businesses with a value up to £8,000, the percentage of relief available will be 80 per cent in April 2008 and 100 per cent in 2009-10.

For businesses with a value between £8,001 to £10,000, the percentage of relief available will be 40 per cent from next April and 50 per cent in 2009, and for the £10,001 to £15,000, the cuts will be 20 per cent from April 2008, and 40 per cent in 2009.

JUSTICE BILL TO TOP GBP 1BN

THE justice department will receive an increase in spending of £131.2 million over the three years to just over £1 billion in 2011.

An extra £107 million will be spent over the next three years on improving prisons. There will also be additional funding of £8 million for community penalties.

Money spent on drugs and alcohol schemes via the health portfolio will be used to tackle alcohol-related crime.

More than £50 million will be spent over three years to equip fire and rescue services with a state-of-the art communications system.

A total of £94 million will be invested over the next three years on recruiting an extra 1,000 police officers.

HEALTH SPEND 'AT STANDSTILL'

SPENDING on health will begin at GBP 11.2 billion in 2008-9 - or GBP 2,200 per person - and rise to GBP 12.2 billion in three years' time.

However, Labour claimed Scotland's health budget is "at a standstill" while it will rise at a rate above inflation south of the Border.

In a total package of GBP 350 million over three years for health improvement, GBP 85 million will go towards tackling alcohol abuse, GBP 9 million to reduce smoking and GBP 35 million on fighting obesity.

The SNP manifesto promised no patient would wait longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to treatment by the end of 2011. However, the budget promised GBP 270 million over three years to ensure that, by the end of 2011, nobody will wait longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to treatment for "routine conditions".

The manifesto commitment to axe prescription charges for people with chronic health conditions, people with cancer and people in full-time education and training will be met with GBP 97 million over three years.

BOOST FOR RAIL AND ROADS

FUNDING for air travel will decrease as the Scottish Government spends GBP 7.3 billion over the next three years to improve public transport and roads.

The budget will encourage public transport by investing GBP 2.6 billion over the next three years in railways, including trams. During the same period GBP 740 million will go towards buses, while local authorities will also be expected to invest in buses. Ferries will get a major funding boost from GBP 74 million in the first year, rising to GBP 111 by 2011.

Roads will also see an increase, with GBP 1.2 billion by 2011 spent on motorways and trunk roads. Some GBP 20 million will be spent in 2008-9 rising to GBP 30 million by 2011 for planning towards a new Forth crossing.

The Greens were concerned that major road projects, including the extension of the M74 in Glasgow, were still being funded. But the party was pleased that the budget proposed a wind-down in support for the development of new air routes from Scotland and funding for air services will fall to GBP 38 million a year.

EDUCATION TO BE SQUEEZED

UNIVERSITY principals, students and teachers were united in criticism of the budget's education squeeze.

Universities Scotland claimed higher education faced its first cut in funding since devolution.

Principals had called for an additional GBP 168 million per cent a year but now expect just GBP 30 million.

Student leaders were also disappointed. The promised transition from loans to grants will not begin until 2010 and the SNP's election pledge to pay the student loans of all Scots living north of the Border has gone.

Teaching unions fear the smaller class sizes promised will depend on local politics, and vary across the country, as prioritising funding on either class sizes or increasing nursery provision - another election promise - will be up to councils.

More free school meals are to be provided but there were no details of when this will happen.

More than 20,000 new teachers are also promised, again without a time-scale. It is unlikely this will be enough to appease an increasingly disillusioned education sector.

GREEN POWER TARGET HAILED

SCOTLAND'S renewable energy industry yesterday welcomed the Scottish Government's pledge to meet a dramatically higher new target for green electricity.

The spending review includes a target of 50 per cent of electricity generated in Scotland to come from renewable sources by 2020.

Jason Ormiston, chief executive of Scottish Renewables, said: "We view this as underlining the administration's commitment to renewable electricity."

The World Wildlife Fund Scotland welcomed plans to use the "ecological footprint" concept. Dr Dan Barlow, the group's acting director, said: "For the first time we will know whether Scotland is moving away from our three-planet lifestyle."

However he said this was "at odds" with support for the M74 extension and Aberdeen bypass.

Duncan McLaren, chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "Even the extra investment will not deliver the government's commitment to deliver emissions' reductions of at least 80 per cent by 2050."

INCENTIVE TO FREEZE TAX

SCOTLAND'S 32 councils will have GBP 34.7 billion to spend over the next three years.

Ministers have set aside GBP 420 million to freeze council taxes, including GBP 70 million for next year.

Local authorities will only get the money if they freeze their council tax.

Ministers say there is enough money to halt rises for three years, but councils say they can only guarantee it for one year.

A "concordat" signed by ministers and council leaders, ends "ring-fencing" of GBP 1.7 billion, money given on condition that it is spent on specific policies.

Local authorities are the only part of the public sector to be given permission to keep any efficiency savings they make. Councils have been promised a reduction in the amount of regulation and inspection forced on them.

They will also sign "outcome" agreements with the Scottish Government setting out the policies they will deliver locally. Ministers have promised to consult councillors before they bring in new policies which affect local government.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2008 12:54 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Government spending
 
1

,

07/02/2008 01:40:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

paulr,

edinburgh 07/02/2008 08:14:38
But they will still waste millions on trams that the people of edinburgh do not want and do not need and that the city's roads infrastructure cannot support.
3

eric,

Lothian 07/02/2008 08:20:22
This is nt good for anyone its just window dressing.
4

Disputer,

07/02/2008 09:32:48
Not an SNP choice though. Blame the opposition.
5

Gothic Rose,

07/02/2008 09:39:51
Don`t care for, the second, last paragraph.[OMINOUS]!!!
6

PaulW,

Borders 07/02/2008 09:40:26
#2 Paul R.

How in heck can you blame the SNP for trams? Remember on trams that it was the SNP (locally and nationally) that opposed them. They were forced to spend £500 million on them, by the Greens, Labour, Lib Dem and Tory MSPs. In some cases this was possibly to try to screw up the budget for the SNP. Well it hasn't worked.

However, without that expense, it would have been far easier to do the other things set out above and have more money to spare for extra Police, University research, abolition of graduates student loan debts etc. The article above doesn't even mention that the hated Labour/Lib Dem graduate endowment/back-end tuition fee will be abolished.
7

Flash67,

Edinburgh 07/02/2008 10:39:31
20,000 new teachers? What's the point in spending millions of taxpayers money training 20,000 new teachers when there are few jobs for them? Only about half of newly trained teachers last year have permanent jobs. With the fudge on providing extra funds to reduce class sizes, and the Govt promising to up the amount of teachers being trained, this is muppetry of the highest order. Sounds like the Govt needs some basic, primary level, numeracy training
8

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/02/2008 11:31:18
8

Let me get this right you think that because funding is available for the training of 20000 new teachers that the money put aside for 20000 teachers will be spent on training teachers even if only 1000 are found and trained? You think that the entire funding will be spent on these 1000 teachers?
The government provides the funding and the Education boards do the recruiting. The Government is saying you can recruit up to 20000 teachers go for it. It is then up to the Education athorities to use the available funding to recruit.
And you think the Govt needs the numeracy training?
9

Spicey,

Glasgow 07/02/2008 12:24:46
"Principals had called for an additional GBP 168 million per cent a year but now expect just GBP 30 million."

To be fair i think asking for an additional 168 million per cent a year is a bit greedy! Whoever wrote this (i noticed nobody was prepared to put their name to it) needs to check their work every now and again, especially as they dont even mention the abolition of the graduate endowment, one of the SNP's key manifesto pledges!
10

Ian on 2-wheels,

Edinburgh 07/02/2008 13:13:49
20,000 new teachers, but where will they be teaching? There are not enough classrooms and those in many schools, including my children's, are falling to pieces. The SNP seem to be cynically foisting responsibility for school development onto the Councils, despite knowing full well that the funding awards made to them will not permit this. This policy does not add up. More teachers do not result in smaller class sizes, just more teachers per dilapidated classroom.
11

Tartan Tory Tango,

07/02/2008 15:05:38
This is the way forward for the new politics: let's keep Labour out of it, they've had their day!
12

Andy Dufresne,

07/02/2008 21:33:00
12 I could not agree more, you conservative bam pot.
The SNP is what the doctor ordered
13

Mallory,

Edinburgh 28/02/2008 06:48:01
A warning re wind-power
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3FZtmlHwcA
14

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 28/02/2008 11:35:35
#6 - Easily I would imagine, as was an SNP executive decision to pass the spending.

Fair enough other parties voted for it and SNP didn't, BUT the SNP Executive could still have turned it down.

They didn't turn it down, they passed it for 2 reasons, (1) try to blame other parties and (2) would have faced a threatened vote of no confidence if had overturned the vote in the chamber.

SNP Executive did easy option and approved the Trams, ignoring the voters that put them in on this huge issue for Edinburgh..

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.