Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Thatcher 30 years on

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 May 2009
THIRTY years on from her becoming Britain's first woman prime minister, the very mention of Margaret Thatcher's name seldom leaves people unmoved, one way or another.
This applies particularly in Scotland, where she has become virtually enshrined in folklore as a political bogeywoman – "Maggie Thatcher, milk-snatcher", as they used to chant.

Margaret Hilda Thatcher, who became prime minister on 4 May, 1979, is seen by some as a powerful figure who revitalised the economy, necessarily took on the trade unions, and became a player on the world stage with her ideological soul-mate, the US president, Ronald Reagan.

But she was also widely reviled for eroding social policy and public spending; for the demise of the Ravenscraig steel plant; for her intransigence during the miners' strike and subsequent dismantling of the coal industry and, of course, for what was perceived as the policy of using Scotland as a testing ground for the hated poll tax, amid scenes of protest that produced political martyrs such as Tommy Sheridan. Repealed in 1991, the unpopular community charge is now regarded as having given a significant boost to the advent of Scottish devolution.

The past few years have seen political reassessments, biographies, even TV dramas about the Iron Lady. On Monday, a new book by political journalist and author David Torrance is launched – We in Scotland: Thatcherism in a Cold Climate – which seeks to redress what he perceives as established myths about her relationship with the Scots – 30 years on, some people may be mellowing towards her, yet in many quarters she remains "that woman".

But popularity was never really an issue, suggests Michael Forsyth, a minister in the Thatcher government and later a Conservative secretary of state for Scotland. "The thing you have to understand about Margaret Thatcher is that she never cared about what people said about her, but she did care what people said about her country," says Forsyth, today Baron Forsyth of Drumlean. "She was not a focus-group politician.

"If you're saying did she do things that were unpopular – well, as whoever wins the next general election is going to discover, when the economy is going down the pan and you have to make tough and difficult decisions, you will not find popularity. But if you get them right, you might get respect."

Forsyth, who still sees Thatcher regularly, describes her as "a thoughtful, kindly person". He adds: "She loves an argument, but woe betide you if you turned up to have an argument with her and you hadn't marshalled your facts."

Forsyth recalls her formidable work ethic: "When I was a junior minister in her government, I was rushing across the central lobby and David Davis (the former Conservative Party chairman], who had just got in, said, 'Slow down Michael. Rome wasn't built in a day.' And I said, 'Yes, well, Margaret Thatcher wasn't the shop steward on that job.' She was relentless, and she's still like that today."

Someone else who recalls Thatcher as both charming and a formidably sharp operator is Bill Hughes, a London-based Scottish businessman and former treasurer of the Conservative Party in Scotland, who was Scottish chairman of the CBI in the late 1980s when he advised Thatcher on introducing the Scottish Enterprise network. "She was charming, with those intense blue eyes that absolutely concentrated on you when you were speaking with her. You might have been the only person on the planet."

Intimidating? "Initially perhaps, but she was just giving you all her attention, which was flattering, because many senior people just don't do that."
He recalls himself and Malcolm Rifkind, then a Cabinet minister, meeting Thatcher at Chequers. "It was reasonably early – we'd gone down on the first shuttle, and the first question she asked us was something about crop yields in Scotland. And we just didn't know the answer. I remember asking Malcolm later, 'Where did she get that knowledge?' And he said, 'She listens to the farming programme (on the radio] in the morning.' Later on she quoted something from The Economist, and I asked Malcolm where she got time to read The Economist. And he said, 'Oh, she reads that before she listens to the farming programme.'"

Hughes believes, however, that Thatcher was never at ease with dealings north of the Border. "She wasn't over-comfortable in Scotland. It was a strong socialist pitch, and I think she was conscious that she hadn't a base of any size there."

So far as the despised poll tax was concerned, he reckons: "The very fact it eventually had to be aborted suggests it wasn't the best of moves. I think she saw some very positive aspects to it, but it just wasn't a runner. I don't think she ever got over that so far as Scotland was concerned."

However, the widely held view that Thatcher used the Scots as "guinea pigs" for what was officially titled the community charge is spurious, argues political writer David Torrance. "It would be foolish to claim that she wasn't widely disliked in Scotland," says Torrance, "although I don't think she was quite as widely disliked as some assume."

He adds: "There is no defence to offer (on the poll tax]. It was clearly a bad tax, but to say it was 'tested' on Scotland misunderstands the motives of the Conservative government and also how Scottish local government was legislated for. The motivation was to get rid of the rates, which were unpopular, and get in a new system before the next election because they thought this was a vote-winner. The idea that they were deliberately inflicting something seen as bad on the Scots is just political mythology."

Myths have accrued, too, Torrance would argue, around the controversial "Sermon on the Mound" episode, when Thatcher addressed the May 1988 General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in a speech regarded by some as an attempt to hijack the gospel to justify her own political views. Thatcher told the General Assembly that the Old and New Testaments had given her "a view of the universe, a proper attitude to work, and the principles to shape economic and social life".

Several clergymen registered their objections – Torrance, however, believes the speech was simply "a highly personal take on the gospels". He says: "She is personally very interested in theology. If you actually read the speech, and I suspect few people have, it's hard to see what the fuss was about. One segment that caused upset was her analogy that the Good Samaritan wouldn't have been able to help someone out if he hadn't been rich. That's self-evidently true, but it touched a raw nerve."

Then the newly appointed convener of the Kirk's Church and Nation Committee at that Assembly, Reverend Norman Shanks is now retired. He recalls "a whole range of political issues" dealt with by that Assembly as being critical of the Thatcher government – "particularly on social and economic policies".

He says: "The Assembly listened to her politely and courteously. But my own feeling and, I think, that of many people was that she just got the mood wrong. If she had made a prudently low-key semi-political speech, I think it would have gone down much better than the slightly preachy, hectoring sermon she delivered. And it was a bad sermon."

Some three decades on Baroness Thatcher, as she is now, is 83 and, according to her daughter Carol's memoir of last year, suffering from the onset of dementia. Recently, the BBC television drama Margaret depicted a more vulnerable, even tearful figure during her last days at Number 10 (played convincingly by Lindsay Duncan, an actress with a decidedly anti-Thatcherite pedigree, having supported the miners during their strike). Two years ago Thatcher became the first British prime minister to be honoured with a statue at Westminster within his or her their lifetime. There are even Che Guevara-style T-shirts sporting featuring her substantially coiffured image.

Are we learning to love Maggie in comfortable hindsight, or is the Iron Lady fixed firmly in our demonology? Torrance believes that perspectives are shifting in London, "although I'm not altogether convinced that they are in Scotland. Here you still get hit with the mantra of the poll tax, she didn't care about Scotland or its manufacturing, etc."

For his part, Hughes reckons any shift in the Scottish perspective on Thatcher will take much longer: "The history books might look at things differently, but within this generation it's going to be very difficult for people to see her in any other way."

And in Scotland's one-time mining communities, any softening of attitudes is simply not on the cards, suggests Nicky Wilson, president/secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers in Scotland, who was on the NUM Scottish executive during the bitter miners' strike of 1984-85. The antipathy to Thatcher was quite personal, he says: "We realised that it wasn't wages or conditions we were fighting for, it was our very existence and our communities. She was the leader of the political party that was out to destroy the NUM – other unions too, but we were the chosen battlefield.

"We were fighting to protect the industry and we've been proved right, as 25 years on we've got a country that has to import 60 per cent of our coal for power stations."

Maggie, Maggie, Maggie! Out, out , out! was the soundtrack to many a demonstration during the 1980s, and when she finally went, in November 1990, there was widespread jubilation. This writer recalls, on the evening of her resignation, seeing a solitary figure, slightly the worse for wear, literally skipping down a street in Edinburgh New Town, chanting "Maggie's awayee, Maggie's awayee," like a delighted child.

He wasn't the only one: the former Liberal Democrat leader Paddy Ashdown recently recalled hearing the news of her departure announced over the Tannoy at Glasgow Airport: "The entire airport burst into spontaneous applause; it went on for about five minutes. There was real heart in this. It wasn't only clapping, but shouts of joy as well.

People were hugging one another and shaking each other's hand. It was as if the city had collectively won the FA Cup."

David Torrance's book We in Scotland: Thatcherism in a Cold Climate (Birlinn, £20) is out on 31 May

The full article contains 1729 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2009 8:05 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

RufusT-Firefly,

01/05/2009 22:45:43
Dame Margaret Thatcher, the greatest Prime Minister Britain has ever had.

As she said "Consensus is the absence of Leadership" and she was spot on.

When you look at the political setup in Holyrood you can be left in no doubt that she was correct.
2

RufusT-Firefly,

02/05/2009 00:24:43
Wardog, I thought you would be in bed by now.

Especially with you appearing at the Scarecrow Festival tomorrow.

http://www.imagesofyorkshire.co.uk/scarecrow-festival-2009.htm
3

Tris,

02/05/2009 00:28:38
Well, to each his own, but I think she was an odious wicked old bag, with the intellectual breadth of .... of..... oh, I dunno.....something very narrow.

My grandmother would say that you can tell a person by their friends... so there was Ronald Reagan and Mr Pinochet, not to mention the screaming skull Tebbit.

Ye gads, says it all.

I see Rufus loved her... or is that loves? But then his beloved Gordon, the soon-to-be ex-prime minister loves her too (tea at Downing street, and lunch at Chequers), so what else would we expect.

Good riddence to her.
4

,

02/05/2009 00:47:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

RufusT-Firefly,

02/05/2009 00:50:37
Thanks for the compliment Observer.
6

,

02/05/2009 00:59:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 01:15:09
The only reason the Scots hated Margaret Thatcher was because she believed in working and paying your way.
8

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 01:44:16
''The only reason the Scots hated Margaret Thatcher was because she believed in working and paying your way.''

Well she wasn't too keen on letting the miners work was she. And if Lady Porter has ever paid her way then I didn't notice it.
9

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 01:48:01
9 Soz I got my aristocratic titles mixed up she is Dame Porter, not Lady. But she's still an on the run crim.
10

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 01:51:40
I used to be like the majority on here I thought nobody could ever be so bad for my beloved Scotland.
Then there was Brown ,what makes him worse is he was born here.
He has ,and is doing more damage to Scotland than Maggie ever did.
She at least had a vision and a belief she was improving the lot of everyone.
She had a plan ,and a route map to get her there.
she made frontal assaults on anyone or anything in her way.
You knew exactly where you stood with Maggie.
She faced everytyhing and everyone head on.
she was terrible for Scotland.

Brown on the other hand has always worked for Brown he has no vision beyond him being PM.
He uses people like McBride ,and others to do his dirty work.
He hides when the going gets tough, he has no plan ,no vision .
I hope he goes on to be more reviled than the milk snatcher.
He is a coward ,and a no user.

11

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 01:54:58
Except the miners didn't work, neither did the welders, or the platers, or the cooncil "workers", or the broo hawks. No argument.
12

qohldr,

02/05/2009 01:55:20
Maggie Thatcher what a witch or maybe that should start with a B.
Who can forget the good old days of rat infested rotten refuge piling up in the streets.
The dead lying unburied, decaying wherever the councils could store them.
The army untrained trying to fight fires with WW2 engines.
Unions bringing down duly elected governments with their actions for more pay even though the country was bankrupt.
Then that (B) itch came along and put a stop to it.
She even had the audacity to introduce a policy where each person paid the same amount for the services provided.
It took years to drag the country back out of the gutter that socialism had put it into (where it has put it again) and make it prosperous but Scotland hates her for it.
What does Scotland have now? National socialist and Union socialist fighting over the country.
13

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 01:58:35
Or the steel workers, or the car workers, or the dock workers, or the train workers, or the teachers
14

Dark Lochnagar,

http://darklochnagar.blogspot.com 02/05/2009 02:02:27
I think a lot of us posters heard about the Thatcher era from their parents or if they lived through it, they have selective memories. But one thing is for sure she was the first ISM and as Andrew Marr concludes in his recent book and I know there are some who disagree with him, we are all THATCHER'S CHILDREN, including the current Labour party. Whether you agreed with the poll tax is a side issue although one much loved by Tommy and his crew.

At the end of the day who will the history books say will have done the most damage to the Scottish and the British economy. Gordon Brown or Margaret Thatcher, I know who I would choose.
15

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 02:04:35
#15

Broon (pants)
16

Mogwai Fear Santa,

02/05/2009 02:27:21
Frankie Boyle said it best about her state funeral:

“For £3 million they could give everyone in Scotland a shovel and we would dig a hole so deep that we could hand her over to Satan personally.”
17

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 02:34:03
12 No you won't get any argument from me as you appear to be a total prlck.
18

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 02:38:26
18
Shirley Porter was the Dame. She who hides out in Haifa now as a crim on the run. Thatcher is a revered Baroness. Can someone explain the difference in their behaviour and philosophy ? Apart from one got caught and one did not.
19

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 02:58:59
Observer tell me who is worse Maggie or Brown?
20

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 03:00:39
#19

Nice.......
21

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 03:08:09
21 Brown, because he claimed to be from the left. But he was just the same as her.
22

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 02/05/2009 03:20:36
#23

Night night Rosie.
Lets hope your GIRO turns up this morning.
23

redcliffe62,

02/05/2009 05:28:40
thatcher was bad for scotland, and until scottish tories admit that she was, that closing the mines and ravenscraig and working with mcgregor at british steel to close it down then the jump in support they need for credibility will never be reached.
she was terrible. she reduced scottish unionism to an embarassment and it has taken a generation to forgive but not forget. i would rather vote for anyone than that steaming pile of old etonians. maybe less in the next cabinet than there used to be when they last won, but some policies and self interests.
24

caithness,

02/05/2009 05:46:15
I'm proud to say that as a Scot I (and my family) always voted for Maggie. A politician with conviction and with the strength of character needed to drag this country (Scotland) back in touch with reality.
25

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 05:59:03
1 RufusT-Firefly,


“Dame Margaret Thatcher, the greatest Prime Minister Britain has ever had.”


It is unlikely that you are anywhere near old enough to remember anything about Thatcher, particularly the long term damage she inflicted upon both our economy and our society.


Now run along and play with your plasma car and ray-guns, none of which will have been manufactured in Scotland.
26

RufusT-Firefly,

02/05/2009 06:51:32
#26 Caithness spot on.

Thatcher brought the United Kingdom screaming and kicking out of the dark ages.

Of course The Nats on here do not like her. She is English after all.

As for Observers comments above, how distasteful.
27

Bejjy,

Europe 02/05/2009 07:49:00
Whatever you say about Thatcher she did have the courage and conviction thats lacking in present day politicians. If it wasn't for her the United Kingdom Government and the country would still be being held ransom by the Trade Unions as was happening prior to 1979.
28

McGinty,

Glasgow & Aberdeen 02/05/2009 07:59:52
Though she is an icon many of the the public are misled by her appearance of power. In fact she actually weakened the power of Britain's government by overcentralizing power in the prime minister's office and taking us away from the 'prima inter pares' model, a trend that has continued under Blair and Brown. She was just one of several of similar ilk and her contribution to the eighties is overstated. Even back then Malcolm Rifkind and Douglas Hurd contributed more of substance than than she ever did and much of the change would have happened anyway, no matter who was in charge. The real heroes of that time were the likes of David Sheppard and Robert Runcie who stood up to the IRA with grace and dignity and without belligerence, as well as fighting against homelessness and inequality brought about by social change. Also people like Lech Walesa, the Pope and Mikhail Gorbachev and others who brought down the iron curtain, and also Geldof and Midge Ure not to mention a host of other talented musicians and artists who we still hear regularly on the radio because their successors haven't always been so good. Not to mention the community groups and activists who kept towns and villages alive when they lost their industry. We are constantly sold a lie because the media were and are obsessed with icons while the real heroes and heroines of our time often go ignored.
29

gus1940,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 08:07:13
And one of these days we might find out how her idiot son became a multi-millionaire.
30

Cadgers,

Perth 02/05/2009 08:25:47

"Thatcher, as she is now, is 83 and, according to her daughter Carol's memoir of last year, suffering from the onset of dementia"....she was suffering from that 'condition' when she took office in 1979!
31

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 08:43:49
She may have "saved" England but Unionists everywhere should always remember that without Margaret Thatcher there would have been NO Scottish Constitutional Convention, NO Scots Tory Party wipeout, NO Devolution Referendums, NO Scotland Act, and NO Scottish Parliament!

It is claimed that Donald Dewar once stated:
"History will undoubtedly record that Margaret Thatcher was the unwitting midwife of the [Scottish]Nation!"
32

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 09:15:33
28 Rufus Your comment about Maggie being so reviled is nothing to do with her being English.
You have tried to introduce this as a pure and simple smear against the SNP.
We dislike Brown for the exact same reasons as we loathed her ,the treatment meted out to Scotland.
He is in fact worse being
a Scottish
b Socialist
Both these traits should be followed by the word allegedley.
So please do not bring in the Scottish ,English dimension.
The Nationalists are not anti English ,we are anti Westminster and pro Scotland.
Please also not Scotland not the Scottish.
Civic Nationalism not any other kind.

saor alba
33

RufusT-Firefly,

02/05/2009 09:25:04
35 Wardog salus populi suprema lex esto,02/05/2009 08:44:16
28. Rufus
Even now after praising Thatcher and ALL of her policies ..............................
==================================================

I praised ALL of the wonderful Margaret Thatcher's policies?

Errrmmmmm, where is the evidence for this?

Once again, Wardog is 'Economical with the Truth'.
34

,

02/05/2009 09:34:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

tommy M,

Scotland 02/05/2009 09:38:15
11 - Couldn't agree with you more. Thought Thatcher was the worst thing to happen to Scotland until the sleazegate party, Brown and Alistair in wonderland brought us the betrayal and treachery, financial meltdown, callous slashing of jobs and budgets and post offices, cash for honours, equitable life, attempted ruin of the Scottish financial sector, illegal war etc.

i also think they in Westminster got such a shock that we in Scotland voted for an SNP government, that they are doing everything in their power to crush any notion of an independent Scotland stone dead.They need our taxes, our oil revenues to bail them out. Westminster and Engerlandshire cannot survive without Scotland's wealth.
36

tommy M,

Scotland 02/05/2009 09:41:53
36 - too right.Why do anti SNP thinkers try to use this tired old xenophobic slant? It doesn't make any logical sense.
This is nothing to do with nationality. It's to do with how much treacherous damage he has done to the people of Scotland (and actually, he hasnnae been that great for Engerland either) Brown is a Scot - and i hate him for what he has done. Nothing to do with nationality.
37

goldenayr,

Alba 02/05/2009 09:56:31
Funny how the hootsmon runs a story of former tory glory(move over Duffy).Just when Labour is in such turmoil.
38

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 10:09:53
38 Rufus I do of course reject that assertion of yours .
However using your logic would it then be fair to suggest that anyone who does not vote SNP would be anti Scottish then?
39

tommy M,

Scotland 02/05/2009 10:12:14
38 - Rufus, you are mixing up Engerland and Westminster. i think it would be fair to say that many snp supporters are against the policies of the Wetsminster governments which have attempted to crush scotland compared to the pro scotland (ie furthering Scotland's interest) government we have here with the SNP in power at Holyrood.
40

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 02/05/2009 10:15:33
Gordon Brown's darling.
41

goldenayr,

Alba 02/05/2009 10:47:34
30 McGinty
Well said
42

Beady,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 11:05:28
Quite simply the greatest Prime Minister of all time.
Strong leadership and firm beliefs!
I will never forgive John Major and the tories who stabbed her in the back.
Maggie won every election she contested and won both ballots at the end.
As a proud Scot I am ashamed by the small mindedness of the fellow Scots when it comes to appraising the Thatcher years!
43

Tebbit,

02/05/2009 11:16:29
Disgraceful that Barry Ferguson and McGregor were fined and banned for making the same gesture that Thatcher is in the photo above.
44

Tebbit,

02/05/2009 11:18:55
46 Beady

I'm sure Gordon Brown agrees with everything you say.
45

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 11:47:11
28 And Thatcher wasn't ''distasteful'' ?

''There are people in my party who believe in consensus politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors......I mean it''

She was the most divisive destructive politician in living memory.

But never mind, every cloud has a silver lining, no matter how awful the cloud. And her lasting legacy will be Scottish independence.
46

The west awake,

Argyll 02/05/2009 12:00:42
She moves me alright, same way a bad pie does.

She's an auld b1tch, the only good thing she ever did was teach us Scots to expect nowt from Britain and to get on our bikes.

Lesson learned Maggie, we'll take it from here now.
47

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 02/05/2009 12:06:52
As Thatcher said, "I owe my premiership to the 11 SNP MPs who voted with the Tories. It is a great pity that only 2 of them survived the 1979 General Election but they saw for themselves what I was able to do to Scotland ...".
48

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 12:19:56
51 I was a girl when that happened. I grew up under Thatcher's regime, had to leave Scotland to find work, such was the devastation she caused. SHE caused, not the SNP. And Labour's feeble fifty did sod all to prevent it. If you think we are going to sit back and let Cameron give us deja vu you can think again. Labour will do NOTHING to stop the Tories wreak devastation all over Scotland again. There is only one sensible choice for any sane person. The Scots will not vote Tory and a vote for Labour is a wasted vote. Draw your own conclusions.
49

Chuck.U.Farley,

02/05/2009 12:24:48
Stuck with the image of Bill Hughes the sycophantic former Head of the Scottish CBI knocking one out over Maggie's picture.

HELP

50

Queen D,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 12:28:59
Wind UP Merchant, just where can I find that quote?
Or are you making things up again?
51

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 12:32:49
I love the way all the rose-tinted-glasses wearing Socialists really seem to believe that alone among all the countries of the West, Scotland and the rest of the UK could have, and could still be, bucking the trend and continue to be the sort of industrialised country we were in the 1950s. Lines of noble, muscled miners and steel workers heading off down to the mines and foundries, like something from a Soviet propoganda poster. Maybe we could have rosy-cheeked peasants scything away in the countryside as well. Get real. Unfortunately those kind of jobs headed East long ago. Aided and abetted, by the way, by the economic sabotage of some of the unions as well as the intransigence on incompatent management. Britain was a basket case. Thatcher had the balls to see it and at least try to address it.
52

The west awake,

Argyll 02/05/2009 12:36:13
51 - WUM Firstly, since when was helping Labour in the SNP agenda? We admire them about as much as they admire us. Maybe you're confusing us with the Lib Dems?
Secondly, at the time of that vote, Callaghans government were in about the same state as Broons is now, - unelectable and teetering on the brink of a well-deserved electoral disaster.
Even you surely wouldn't blame the SNP for that.
I loath the Tories, but it can't be denied England wanted them then, plain and simple, and the blame for that lies squarely with the Labour party.
"Look not for the mote in Gods eye, but for the beam in thy own"
53

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 12:46:39
55 Britain may well have been a basket case but she burned the basket rather than try and sort things out in a positive way.

You talk about us still being an industrialised country. Well yes, we should be. Most of our European neighbours understood that when times were tough they needed to help their manufacturing industry out a wee bit. You didn't see the French or the Germans deliberately destroying their own manufacturing industries and coal mines for the sake of making a political point. Her actions in doing that led directly to the financialisation of our economy which has led directly to the Godawful mess we are in now.

And incidentally Draco you despair at the underclass which exists in this country, as do I. Well, she had a huge hand in causing it. She shifted so many people onto incapacity benefit to disguise the unemployment figures, and lots of them never got off it.
54

The west awake,

Argyll 02/05/2009 12:50:42
54 - I have searched for the quote - can't find it.
My bet is it's a pure fib - not that it matters, the SNP don't owe Labour one red cent.
I couldn't care whether she said it or not personally, - as far as I'm concerned you couldn't get a fag paper between Labour and the Tories.
55

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 12:55:11
59 It's the unionist ace in the hand. They always play it. Personally I don't care what happened in 1979 that was then, this is now. The SNP are led by a group of people who once got chucked out of their party for being too left wing. They have mellowed now, but I don't think any one of them could be accused of being a Tory. That's just the unionists last drink in the last chance saloon. They will throw that at us because they don't have anything else to throw.
56

go boil ur heid,

02/05/2009 13:05:52
it doesn't take brains no see that thatcher sold off all the industries and lived off the proceedes for twenty years, and when the furniture was gone so was thatcher.
57

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 02/05/2009 13:15:25
#58 Observer

This bogey-woman image of Thatcher, holds a real light up to one of the most distasteful of the Scottish national traits, the ability to hold an irrational grudge. Whether it be us still girning about Edward I, the '45, the Glencoe massacre or Thatcher, we really need to grow up and move on. We need to assess what Scotland was like pre 1979 and what it's like now. If you really think she deliberately destroyed profitable, efficient industries, you're letting your apparent hatred of her overcome your intelligence. Yes, very unfortunately for the workers, she let many UK companies sink or swim. Some, like British Leyland, British Shipbuilders, British Steel either went bust because they weren't economic or were greatly slimmed down. Some, Like BA or BT went on to become quite succesful companies. You go on about Germany still being a successful manufacturing company. Yes, because it had and has very efficient companies that didn't need so much state subsidy. Huge swathes of French and Italian heavy industry went to the wall as much as ours. Like I say, if you think the UK taxpayer could have afforded to subsidise lame ducks like British Leyland, producing shoddy cars that noone wanted, you're in another world again.
58

PictiScot,

02/05/2009 13:16:06
Bad as the Tories were they didn't wreck the fnance system,attack family values, decimate industry to the extent nulab have ,run down and humiliate our armed forces,and through uncontrolled immigration import islamic terrorism.

It is a little known fact that more manufacturing jobs have been lost post 1997 under nulab (2m) than under Thatcher . By the time Lawson became chancellor manufacturing had risen to 25% GDP and had become far more efficient;by 1988 Scotland was booming again with the new 'sunrise' industries.
59

Bejjy,

Europe 02/05/2009 13:16:37
#58 Observer,,

She shifted so many people onto incapacity benefit to disguise the unemployment figures, and lots of them never got off it.

No she didn't given that Incapacity Benefit wasn't introduced until 1995 by which time Thatcher was long gone.
60

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 13:23:40
64 No it was called sickness benefit then. A pedantic point doesn't change the fact that she deliberately encouraged movement of vast swathes of people onto benefits where they were not encouraged to or expected to find work. They just had to have something wrong with them, a culture which is with us to this day.

62 I don't have an irrational grudge it is entirely rational. Take the mining industry. She destroyed it deliberately. And Ravenscraig, I could list others too. And she sold off the family silver, she generated her economy by selling off public assets and relied upon Scottish oil revenue whilst decimating the Scottish industrial base. Fair enough you may say if it derived any long term benefits. It didn't.
61

The west awake,

Argyll 02/05/2009 13:38:25
"Whether it be us still girning about Edward I, the '45, the Glencoe massacre or Thatcher"

- They seem like very rational grudges to me!

PS You left out the "irrational" clearances and the "fighting 50".
62

Dr Japes,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 13:56:29
It's still hard to believe that the country that produced the enlightenment is these days largely inhabited by neanderthals in thrall either to the myths of Socialism or the quasi mystical dogma of the Bravehearts. Britain was in a very bad way in 79 after years of state socialism on the part of both Labour and the Conservatives. It wasn't something that was going to go away overnight, and things had to get worse before they got better. If, in the spirit of empiricism pioneered by Scots such as David Hume, any of you cared to actually look at the data, you would find a clear structural break in UK economic performance from the mid-eighties.

Thatcher transformed the British (and Scottish) economy, was victorious in defeating unprovoked foreign aggression in a war halfway round the world, and with help of Ronald Reagan, won the cold war. What more do you want from a prime minister? The reason she is still hated in Scotland is because Scots are hate-filled irrational tribalists largely driven by their emotions rather than the facts (see above). And I speak as a Scot myself.
63

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 14:15:32
''Thatcher transformed the British (and Scottish) economy, was victorious in defeating unprovoked foreign aggression in a war halfway round the world, and with help of Ronald Reagan, won the cold war. What more do you want from a prime minister? The reason she is still hated in Scotland is because Scots are hate-filled irrational tribalists largely driven by their emotions rather than the facts (see above). And I speak as a Scot myself.''

Yes Thatcher did most definitely transform the British and Scottish economy. Hail hail the property and share owning democracy. She led the way to an economy based on financialisation and property prices. Which is why we are in the shlt that we are now.

And the UK has excelled at being an aggressor in warfare. After the invasion of Iraq we have managed to help make the world seven times more dangerous (Bergen and Cruickshanks). Hail hail again.

If being driven by your emotions to question whether this is a sensible thing makes me a hate filled tribalist then I plead guilty m'lud and would like to have several other offences taken into consideration.

BTW do you really think the cold war was ''won'' ? I think it just ended.
64

Bejjy,

Europe 02/05/2009 14:16:48
People like Observer bleat on about how Thatcher destroyed industry in the United Kingdom but the woman should be applauded for the way she dealt with the wasteful (of tax payers money) and inefficient industrial industries and the grasping and power crazy trade union barons such as Scargill. If Thatcher had never come to power the country would have gone down the road of bankruptcy long before Brown took it there. And as for sickness/incapacity benefit, there are tens of thousands receiving benefit who wouldn't want to work if a job was offered to them. Thats not the fault of the system but the many benefit recipients who have no pride or self worth. Why do so many people from other EU states go to the UK to work; because a lot of the lazy indigenous b*****ds living there don't want to work but then complain about too many foreigners living in the country.
65

Grant,

Edinburgh, Scotland 02/05/2009 14:25:13
The great drip feed of Thatcherism was, of course, the abundant lucre of North Sea Oil revenue flowing into HM Treasury during her time in office.

The most grotesque myth about Mrs Thatcher and her relationship with Scotland is that she "did good" for Scotland's economy through her wonderful "Thatcherite" reforms. Complete nonsense. She didn't even practice her Thatcherite reforms Scotland. She even admits that in her own autobiography! There were no Thatcherite incentives here. There was no attempt to revive the "supposed" spirit of enterprise. Pushing large numbers onto sickness benefit and encouraging low skilled, footloose industries to Scotland to somehow soak up the unemployed have left the Scottish economy with significant structural problems that we still see today.

I'm not saying we could go on with heavy industry and manufacturing, neither could we afford to subsidise many of these industries. We couldn't. But where were the benefits of Thatcherism (and there were many of that there should be no doubt) in Scotland? Where were the good paid jobs, sustainable industries of the future? Concentrated in London and the Tory Shires.

Thatcher failed Scotland. She can blame the people here, if she wants to. And the hate-filled misty-eyed Unionists who live in their wee fantasy world of Britishness, Unions, empires and wars (which the rest of us have to pay for) can worship her if they want to - but where are the tangible benefits of Thatcherite rule in Scotland? I would have liked there to have been at least some to compensate for the significant sea change in our economic composition.
66

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 14:29:29
69 I am not bleating Bejjy I have demonstrated exactly why Thatcher's policies, continued by Labour, have brought us to the sorry state that we are in just now.

When it comes to talking about the waste of tax payers money NOTHING can rival the trillions that we have had to throw at the banks, cut loose by Thatcher and her heirs. And she is directly responsible for starting the speculative bubble that built up around house prices by introducing RTB and making owner-occupation and housing a way of generating false money rather than viewng housing as a place to live. And the decline of manufcturing industry which she made a policy means that we have next to nothing to fall back on in these troubled times, unlike most of our European neighbours who were too smart to walk the road that she, and her heirs in Labour did.

Feel free to point out where I have got that wrong.
67

Observer,,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 14:30:39
And I forgot to add that much of her economic ''miracle'' was based on Scotland's oil.
68

Grant,

Edinburgh, Scotland 02/05/2009 14:31:14
#69 ""And as for sickness/incapacity benefit, there are tens of thousands receiving benefit who wouldn't want to work if a job was offered to them. Thats not the fault of the system but the many benefit recipients who have no pride or self worth.""

Total poppycock. It *is* the fault of the system - a system that she utilised to the full. Mrs Thatcher did more for Welfarism in Britain (not just Scotland) than anyone else. The system sustained large numbers of people and that is precisely how the government wanted it - to massage the unemployment statistics. Had that system not been there it would have (a) been better for the individuals involved but (b) have been a disaster for the government, when the true scale of unemployment was revealed.

Indeed, how exactly is sustaining people on welfare, Thatcherite? Didn't making these people dependent on the state not cancel out the reforms that resulted in many heavy industries been cut loose from the teat of public subsidy?
69

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 02/05/2009 14:42:36
69 bejjy Can I ask what line of work you are involved in?
70

Bejjy,

Europe 02/05/2009 14:50:50
Various

If Thatcherism and her right wing policies were so bad for the United Kingdom why did the British electorate vote into power the Conservatives in 1979 and keep them in power until 1997. Although you commenting here might not have liked Thatcher's way of doing things the vast majority of the British electorate (and thats what matters in a democracy) obviously did. And can I ask, in my many years of living and working in many of the major cities within the United Kingdom and indeed the British Isles (Dublin) as a whole why is it that only in Scotland in the Great Britain part of the Kingdom that people talk in terms of Unionists and Non-Unionists. Is this to do with what Dr Japes @ 67 described Scots as being "hate-filled irrational tribalists"? When I lived and worked in Manchester or London I never heard any English person describe themselfs as a Unionist or Non-Unionist and they have probably got no concept of the term. Does that not suggest that you Scots who constantly use this terminology are still living in some previous existence?
71

Bejjy,

Europe 02/05/2009 14:59:35
74 Scottish and Proud,

I'm now retired from the rat-race thank God.
72

caithness,

02/05/2009 15:13:39
#52. Observer "The Scots will not vote Tory". You undermine your argument by sweeping generalisations. Unfortunately for you some Scots do vote Tory. I lived through Thatcher's government and I supported her 100 per cent.
73

Grant,

Edinburgh, Scotland 02/05/2009 15:42:19
75.

Well, her government was overwhelmingly rejected in Scotland time and time and time again. But as for the rest of the UK, the "vast majority" of the electorate did not support her - the fact is she never got much more than 40% of the popular vote.

As for the etymology of Unionist, it doesn't very much differ from that of "Nationalist" that is used by those of a particular viewpoint. A Unionist is someone who conciously, or unconciously, supports the constitutional status quo. It is a definition. If Unionists wish to see themselves as a "tribe" then they can. Indeed it is no different to Tories calling people lefties or socialists, which they do with alacrity.

I mean, I can't be the only one who sees the delicious contradiction provided by Dr Japes at #67 who spews his bile about "neaderthals" and "socialism" and goes on to castigate everyone else in Scotland for being "hate-filled, irrational, tribalists". A rather wonderful irony in that post, I think.
74

nova albion,

02/05/2009 15:53:46
Margaret Thatcher, she saved Britain from disaster,Callaghan and the unions had brought Britain to it's knees,rubbish piled high in the streets,strikes after strikes. Well done Maggie,you gave us our pride back.
75

Tris,

02/05/2009 16:24:24
#51 WUM.....

As Thatcher said, "I owe my premiership to the 11 SNP MPs who voted with the Tories.

Erm... did she not credit anything to any of the other parties in the Commons.... or did she not know about them?

She really was a silly old bat if she believes that. The vote of confidence, when every party in the Commons supported the Conservative motion that the Labour Party was completely and utterly useless, which they were, was followed by a General Election, where the people of Britian had the right to elect whomsoever they wanted!

The Labour Party was never going to be re-elected following the mess they made of the country. The vote of confidence only brought the eventual Tory win forward by a few months.

76

Jim P,

02/05/2009 16:48:46
The moronic BBC refers to "the legendary William Wallace"! Probably, the same "rebel" William Wallace they mentioned on the BBC TV news a few years back.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8029524.stm
77

James.com,

02/05/2009 16:50:53
If it was not for the Financial genius wot is the Labour Party, we would not need the Thatchers of this world.
78

,

02/05/2009 17:14:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
79

Green eyed monster,

02/05/2009 18:23:28
Thank god and all that is decent and holy for Maggie. Vote Conservative.
80

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 02/05/2009 18:34:05
One thing she wasn't was a coward. I have to admit she was one tough daughter of a gun, astute, clever and hard working.

She made made really bad decisions however and that will always be her legacy. Sad because she is, after all, only human.

She did what she did and was in office at the right time and obviosuly popular as she reigned for quite a few years.

That said, we have moved on and she wouldn't have a place in this 21st century Scoland/UK albeit her legacy lives on.

You ask why I'm being nice? No reason other than because I can, making myself the better person. I genuinely wish her well....and I was also a big fan of Spitting Image!
81

Walter Ego,

Durness 02/05/2009 19:00:44
Nationalist support for a real bastardd of a woman. Shameful.
82

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 02/05/2009 19:27:34
86

Where??
83

nursiebill,

glasgow 02/05/2009 19:35:29
When the old bag passes away I'll will do a wee dance and have a massive party to celebrate. She destoyed communities the length and breadth of the UK and for no other reason than political idealology, and if there was any benefit to the country then that was a lucky by product. I suppose i should be thanking her because until she came to power i was 100% unionist but she changed all of that
84

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 02/05/2009 19:53:17
The unsavoury prospect of a Tory/BNP/SNP alliance grows ever closer.
85

nova albion,

02/05/2009 20:27:49
Thatcher brought pride back to Britain after the Labour government nearly distroyed it, callaghan hah rubbish piled high in the street.
86

greenhill,

03/05/2009 13:27:36
The people who should apologise from that the time were the many Scottish left wingers who were enemies of the West and friends of real tyranny.

Their mainspring broke with the collapse of the Soviet Communist Empire. Now we do not hear so much from these scumbags about "socialism" or how East Germany was such a great place, however they still hate freedom and now love to make excuses for Islamic terrorism.

The NUM was led by Communist vermin: have these people ever apologised for their political stance at the time. And what about all those schoolteachers, University lecturers, intellectuals and Labour party members who were totally Marxist and went out of their way to indoctrinate young minds. How many of them say sorry?

Shame on those leftie losers. I am so glad to have seen the end of the appalling political climate they created in Scotland.
87

Athiest,

swansea 04/05/2009 09:22:07
#75 Bejjy
Yes it took that long for those who consider themselves
" Middle Class " realized that they had been conned.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.