Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Strike misery at end as union members defy leaders and accept council pay deal



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 November 2008
THE vast majority of local government workers defied their union leaders yesterday and voted to accept a two-year pay deal – effectively ending a series of strikes that had disrupted council services across Scotland.
Leaders of the three unions involved in the dispute – Unison, Unite and the GMB – had recommended that the pay offer be rejected.

But yesterday, it emerged that the 100,000 Unison members, who make up bulk of local government workers, had decided to ignore this advice and accept the deal.

Members of Unite – thought to number about 15,000 to 20,000 council employees – have rejected the pay offer, while the 26,000 GMB workers have yet to make a decision.

But even if the GMB join Unite in saying no the offer, a big majority of local authority staff will have voted to accept the pay deal, weakening any further strike action.

Not only have Unison members ended the damaging period of strike action that disrupted council services over the autumn, they have also dealt a blow to the authority of their leaders.

Cosla, the local government employers organisation, was delighted with the Unison decision, describing it as "good news", both for communities and workers.

The industrial action by the GMB, Unison and Unite started in the late summer after members of all three unions rejected a 2.5 per cent pay deal for each of the next three years.

After two one-day strikes, Cosla came back with a two-year deal, offering a 3 per cent rise in year one and 2.6 per cent in year two.

As far as the union leaderships were concerned, this was still not good enough, and all three recommended a rejection of the offer, which would have paved the way for further strikes through the winter.

But yesterday, when the Unison result was announced, it became clear that its members had had enough of industrial action and wanted to settle the pay claim.

Unison did not reveal the share of the vote for each side but said it was "very close".

Dougie Black, Unison's regional organiser and the lead union negotiator, continued to insist yesterday that the Cosla offer had been "poor".

He said: "This offer is not good, but circumstances have led to our members drawing this dispute to a close. They have made a pragmatic decision based on the perilous state of local government finance, the unsettled wider economy and the fact that Christmas is almost upon us."

Stephanie Herd, who chairs Unison's local government committee, said: "It was clear from employers' statements that they had become entrenched.

"In accepting this offer and improving our members' basic pay until 2010, Unison and the employers have the opportunity to look at ways of tackling low pay in local government without the backdrop of a dispute.

"This should be the start of constructive and meaningful discussions on pay for the future, not simply the end of a hard-fought, bitter dispute."

Councillor Michael Cook, Cosla's spokesman on human resources, said he was pleased that Unison members in Scotland's councils had voted to accept the two-year deal.

"Obviously, I'm pleased with this result," he said. "As employers, we made the best offer we could in all the circumstances. I'm pleased that Unison members have recognised that. This is good news for our workforce and our communities."

A source in the GMB described the Unison result as "disappointing" but said his union would have to wait until next Monday for its ballot.

Jim Farrelly, from Unite, said his members had rejected the offer by 59 per cent to 41 per cent and that turnout had been "extremely healthy". Unite's leaders will be meeting shop stewards soon to decide on their next course of action.


The full article contains 641 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 November 2008 12:23 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

13/11/2008 00:07:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

13/11/2008 00:43:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Conan the Librarian™,

13/11/2008 01:05:53
The whole point of the strike was to better the lot of lower paid workers.

The front line people, not the inhabitants of Waverley Court.

Well COSLA managed it.

Front line services savaged.

And the managers...manage.
4

Fifi la Bonbon,

13/11/2008 01:50:40
What a waste of time and local government workers' money this strike was.

They were offered 2.5 per cent. They refused, and went on strike for two days. They accepted an extra half a per cent in one year. This was less than the two days pay they effectively donated to their employers when they went on strike on the recommendation of Unison.

So they've end up slightly worse off than if they'd accepted the original offer and stayed at work, and the people who really needed the services they provide - disabled people especially - lost out two days service.

Unison has let its members down with stupid leadership that left their members no better off and harmed vulnerable people. I bet their full time officials didn't lose a penny.

And I bet their former chief negotiator, now jumped ship as the bosses' chief negotiator, is having a long cynical laugh at the people he used to represent and the idiots who represent them now. I don't know how much he's paid now but I bet he's worth every penny to his bosses.
5

Conan the Librarian™,

13/11/2008 02:24:46
Fifi, do you work for a council?

Which particulary vulnerable people suffered due to the strike?

Or does "suffer" mean "inconvenience"?
6

Fifi la Bonbon,

13/11/2008 03:00:07
Conan, I have friends who are council workers and, against their better judgement, members of Unison (or as it used to be known, NALGO - Not A Lot Going On).

On the strike days a lot of people were meant to go to day centres and suchlike, and others were due to be visited by care staff at home. They missed out on those days, as did carers who were planning to do things during respite periods. Some were distressed by this. It was more than inconvenience.

You can cope with missing a day you'd planned to go to the library, but some vulnerable people had a harder time of it.
7

Fifi la Bonbon,

13/11/2008 03:04:52
Conan, did you know that Unison's former Scottish Organiser for Local Government is now Head of the Employers Organisation at COSLA?
8

,

13/11/2008 03:09:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

W Smith,

Middle East 13/11/2008 03:48:33
These workers should get back to what they call "work" which to the rest of us looks like a good skive.

Another great article by Richard Littlejohn in the Daily Mail today about government jobs advertised in the left-wing Guardian.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1085232/For-years-fun-absurd-gold-plated-public-sector-jobs-Guardian-As-unemployment-REAL-world-heads-3m-Littlejohns-patience-runs-out.html

Gordon Brown continues to spend a national fortune on Public Sector jobs while harder working and more productive folks in the Private Sector lose their jobs!

"LABOUR'S NOT WORKING" - to quote a well known political campaign to oust Labour in the late Seventies.
10

,

13/11/2008 04:28:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Soosider,

Glasgow 13/11/2008 06:25:40
As a member of Unison I am angry that the Union got us into this strike in the first place. It was manifestly clear that there was never a mandate for action as only 30% of members voted in the original ballot. It was blindingly obvious that there was never going to be any more money available.So why were we led out on 2 days strike?
A half a percentage point rise is not a victory, it will take members several years to recoup the lost 2 days wages.
I fear that we have returned to the bad old days of political activists campaigning for action that has nothing to do the best interests of their members. The consequence of this action will be an even bigger drop in Union membership.
12

,

13/11/2008 06:45:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

John Cameron,

St Andrews 13/11/2008 07:19:39
When the Union "leaders" meet the shop stewards to decide their next course of action, could I suggest they consider a mass resignation. I suspect that most council workers are well aware of how much they have to lose. In comparison with workers in the private sector they have jobs for life and a gold plated pension to boot. Not since Red Robbo destroyed the British car industry have such a bunch of toxic trouble makers surfaced in Britain. Time for another mass extinction of the dinosaurs?
14

Regulator,

Edinburgh/Aksai 13/11/2008 07:58:54
Unfortunately Britains wealth and the ability to pay council workers good wages and pensions is based on the financial sector, where not so long ago we were pretty strong, the dollar was 2 to the pound, the EURO 1.6 to the pound. Even more unfortunately now the dollar sits at 1.5 to the pound and more important the EURO, where most of our imports come from is 1.2 to the pound. So we print money and it gets even worse? We've all enjoyed the good times and it looks like the council employees have had the sense to accept what is on offer and not make things any worse than they are. I hope the rest look at it the same way.
15

Hugo of Garven,

13/11/2008 08:40:54
#11 Soosider,Glasgow

" . . only 30% of members voted in the original ballot."

It would seem that the other 70% did not care (or did not know there was to be a ballot?)

I suspect many more than 30% attended the meeting where they accepted the latest offer.



16

drunken proffet,

Tassy 13/11/2008 08:42:31
Well having elected a Labour government in Australia and having a great many union officials elected to the front bench, we are expecting great things from the Union Movement.
17

Linda,

Edinburgh 13/11/2008 08:52:35
Unite is in Labour's pocket. What responsible Union would slag off attempts to keep HBOS independent thus saving thousands of jobs and most of those that will go are the lower paid clerks and clerkesses.

And why do the Unions oppose a Local Income Tax which will benefit the lower paid the most.
18

Regulator,

Edinburgh/Aksai 13/11/2008 09:01:40
Linda; Who is going to pay for these jobs that are not productive and even not required?
19

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 13/11/2008 09:49:39
Fifi la Bonbon & Linda.
The union bosses are part of the Labour Party and have no interest in their Scottish members other than to use them to discredit the SNP government.
One day the members will realise this and withdraw in large numbers from paying the political levy.
Form for this purpose is available from local officials but from experience you have to ask over and over again to get one.
20

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 13/11/2008 10:37:17
At least the workers had the common sense to realise they're just being used by their union leaders to feather their own nests and suck up to Labour in the expectation of honours and being placemen on quangos.

Their union leaders never suffer and are on very nice salaries. Their key objective is to justify their existence by getting a wee bit bolshie now and again but not enough to be dangerous, which might upset their political masters, then go back to sleep.

Also it must be asked why unions feel they should be affiliated to Labour when plainly Labour (so called) have no interest in the working class but rather more how well they can stock up from inflated salaries and ridiculous expense claims.
21

Thistledhu,

Fife 13/11/2008 10:50:18
Unison were told cleary in the meeting's after the last strike's that the memborship were not intrested in Strike action. But the so called activists!!! insisted on going ahead.
Unison have sufferd the consequences of takeing there memborship for granted
those involved in pushing for the strike should step down.
22

,

13/11/2008 10:50:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Thistledhu,

13/11/2008 11:13:16
Why is the likes of black saying Unison still thinks this is a poor offer / Unison has voted to accept the offer it is a clear indication of how low an opinion he and others in unison house hold of the membership.

Dougie Black and Matt smith should stand down now
24

Number 6,

Germany 13/11/2008 14:41:53
What a pathetic shambles. Well done to the work force on this occasion. I hope they continue to ignore these distructive Liebour lackies in the future.
25

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 13/11/2008 15:53:40
A huge sigh of relief from the SNP government which didn't have a clue how to handle this. They owe a debt of gratitude to UNISON members.
26

,

13/11/2008 17:09:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

,

13/11/2008 17:09:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

Shug,

14/11/2008 13:08:29
as we are about to go into a period of deflation any pay rise should be grabbed if it's on offer.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.