Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Spending axe could cut Labour down

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 November 2008
FIRST indications are that Alistair Darling's package of measures announced on Monday have gone down well with voters. A YouGov poll published yesterday showed Labour had narrowed the Tories' lead to just four points, compared with a nine-point gap last month and the Conservatives' 23-point advantage six months ago.
Translated into seats, the latest findings would mean a hung parliament with Labour as the biggest party. And the poll confirmed the recovery of the Government's reputation in the face of the economic downturn.

On the question "Which party would y
ou trust to look after ordinary people's interests during the present crisis and coming recession?", 40 per cent said Labour and just 26 per cent the Tories.

There may be scepticism about some of Mr Darling's measures, but it seems people would rather have Gordon Brown and he steering the ship than David Cameron and George Osborne.

The City seemed to like Mr Darling's package too, rewarding him with the biggest ever one-day rise in the stock market.

And if the Government's measures do work, Labour politicians dare to believe they could even win the next General Election. But Monday's package could cause problems for the party in Scotland.

The SNP has broadly welcomed the thrust of Mr Darling's measures, especially the bringing forward of capital spending to help get the economy moving.

But it warns there is a "sting in the tail" in the shape of spending cuts which will be fed down to the Scottish Government's budget as a result of the £5 billion of "efficiencies" the Chancellor promised to find by 2010-11.

Depending on which UK departments these come from, Scotland could face cuts of up to £500 million. And the SNP says a cut in the capital budget for health projects south of the Border will mean another reduction of £129m in the overall amount Scotland has to spend.

Alex Salmond and his colleagues will have to make tough choices about where the spending axe should fall. But it is Labour who could suffer more from the cuts – because the Scottish Government can and will put the blame on London.

For the last month or so, the SNP has been on the back foot over the banking crisis and economic downturn, which were seen as undermining its case for independence. But the prospect of London-imposed spending cuts is a new weapon with which the Scottish Government can beat Labour.

One Scottish Labour insider says: "We've been having some success in highlighting SNP cuts, but now these will be portrayed as Labour cuts. The SNP has had a really bad two months, but this could give them some life again."

The Nats are also taking the opportunity to try to claw back some credibility for the independence argument, claiming that this year a separate Scotland would have an economy in overall surplus because of booming oil revenues.

A senior SNP source says: "All this adds up to a good argument for Scotland to have control over its own finances. Oil revenue this year will be £13.2bn – £3.3bn more than the Chancellor expected at budget time in March. And over the six years to come, oil revenue will be £55bn, up from £41bn over previous six years."

Mr Darling's announcement of a new 45p top tax rate on salaries over £150,000, to be introduced after the next election, allowed commentators to hail his package as the death of New Labour.

"He's returned to his socialist roots," jokes one former Edinburgh colleague, recalling the Chancellor's days as a Lothian regional councillor fighting Thatcherite cuts.

It will be the first time Labour has gone into an election pledged to any rise in income tax since 1992, when John Smith proposed a top rate of 50p in the pound and an increase in National Insurance contributions from higher earners.

The "shadow budget" was apparently well received during the campaign, but was later blamed for Labour losing the election. Expert analysis suggests Mr Darling's top tax rate will bring in hardly any extra revenue, but after the public outrage over bankers' bonuses it must have seemed a good symbolic move if nothing else.

And right-wing commentators are already calling for the Tories to make the scrapping of the new rate their first act if they win the next election.

But one Labour insider says it's a trap set for the Tories which David Cameron will not fall into. "Those calling for the 45p rate to be scrapped are bone-headed right-wingers and unfortunately for us, David Cameron is not a bone-headed right-winger."

But the YouGov poll also found 47 per cent of people thought Mr Cameron had come out of the current crisis "badly".

Despite the Tories' attempts to blame the Government and the Prime Minister in particular for the economic downturn, an academic study published this week found few voters believe Gordon Brown is personally responsible for the crisis.

But Mr Brown and his Chancellor will be hoping they do get the credit if this week's package succeeds.





The full article contains 854 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2008 9:37 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Ian Swanson
 
1

subrosa,

27/11/2008 10:25:40
Another labour press release. Boring.
2

subrosa,

27/11/2008 10:27:29
'The City seemed to like Mr Darling's package too, rewarding him with the biggest ever one-day rise in the stock market.'

It's well documented that this one-day rise was mainly due to the bail out of Citibank.

If you're going to 'report' facts then at least given your readership a little credit for knowing the basics.

3

Linda,

Edinburgh 27/11/2008 10:30:29
For years, Labour claimed that independence would cost every Scottish household £5,000. Labour figured that was the size the bogeyman would need to be to scare Scots from the SNP and independence.

The plan put forward by the Labour Government will cost each Scottish family £50,000. A household debt coming for everyone which will be almost TEN times higher than the straw bogeyman Labour manufactured.

This is a double whammy as unlike Westminster the SNP government has already introduced 2% efficiency savings which are going into front line services and not cuts.

WE need independence so that the Scottish government can take proper financial decisions and we are held back by the Westminster financial straightjacket.

When Angus MacNeill made this point in House of Commons, former Chancellor Kenneth
Clarke MP agreed that Scotland was owed an apology for decades of scaremongering.
4

Raymond Thomas Brooke,

Leven England 27/11/2008 10:39:55
Here we go again evry thing is really excellent nothing to worry about etc etc.Try us GB call an election
5

Sanny,

Glasgow 27/11/2008 12:29:43
There is only one poll that counts and that is a general election. Brown has thus far avoided putting himself and his policies before the electorate. He knows full well, that if he were to go to the country both he and his policies would be rejected.

The Labour vote in Scotland may still hold, but I sincerely doubt it . In England they want to be shot of Labour and the Scottish mafia that runs it. Brown and the ‘Prince of Darkness’ are fully aware of this situation and will keep this parliament until the last possible day, in the Macaber type hope that “something will turn up”! Alternatively they will engage in a scorched earth policy in order that, during their period in opposition they can blame Tories for the mess Labour created.

I sometimes wonder if 300 years of subjugation by the Westminster government has created such an inferiority complex in the Scots they no longer have faith in their own abilities. It is my earnest hope that sufficient Scots will vote for independence and lead their fellow countrymen to freedom.

It is worthy of note that when slavery was abolished many black slaves in the southern states of America were afraid of their newfound freedom. Who would look after them now? Ask their descendants if they wish to return to the days of slavery. Ask the Irish if they wish to return to the situation before 1916. I think we all know the answers.
6

steve 1511,

aberdeen 27/11/2008 12:34:03
comrade broons plan to turn the country into a state based on the soviet eastern block model makes more headway
country £1 trillion in debt
bankrupt economy
3 million unemployed shortly
retail spending plunging
companies going bust on a daily basis
banks bust
house prices in free fall
voters being bribed by meaninless tax cuts like 1p of a mars bar from 39p to 38 p
is the next stage the robert mcgabe food for votes plan
the list of failures of the liebour sleaze and corruption party is endless
WE ARE DOOMED WITH BROON,DOOOOOMED
7

me150,

27/11/2008 12:42:51
You are fools if you think it would be any different with any other party leading the country. No matter who is there they would have to deal with the 'GLOBAL' economic issues and they would be restricted to very similar policies as we are seeing now.
8

capy,

embra 27/11/2008 13:09:28
Just watched an abject preformance from Ian Grey in Holyrood, wouldnt admit to how much we will get our budget cut. But did say we had to take our shsre of the pain. Nu Labour dont you just love them.
9

subrosa,

27/11/2008 13:14:43
#7

Yes it is a global problem and the UK is by far in the worst position to handle it. 11 years of mismanagement, spend and borrow have brought us to this.

The Americans are beginning to get sick of hearing it's all their fault that the UK is so bad. The UK decided to follow the American way. Pity they didn't look around further and see that others shunned the sub-prime mortgage business.
10

BIG EYE,

Paisley 27/11/2008 13:37:26
Woolworths survived two world wars, recession after recession but stood absolutely no chance in the face of the Brown/Darling onslaught.

Despite vainglorious attempts by Labour's Scottish media to shore up the dying corpse of new Labour the life blood is oozing away ever more each day with lost homes, devastated pensions, soaring unemployment and even more crippling debt.

They will be long remembered...and vilified by future generations for the disaster they have been.
11

57vintage,

Keith 27/11/2008 14:58:19
#10

If FWW's retail plans in Aberdeen are mirrored elsewhere, it can be no surprise that the company is in trouble.

They took occupancy of a massive superstore at Aberdeen's Beach Retail Centre, spending a fortune as they geared up for opening, but nobody went there. They eventually had to pull out. It's now a very successful Asda.

FWW has failed to keep up with the times. Every electrical appliance comes complete with a plug these days, so no need for anyone to buy them and giants like Tesco have blown them out of the water by allowing shoppers to do the weekly food shop and buy FWW type goods at the same time in an extremely competitive market. Woolies was of its time when cheap and cheerful met many people's aspiration. Times and aspirations have changed as we've become more affluent and more choosy. Ain't capitalism wonderful?

Remember who's buying the stuff and from where. It's you and me mate, exercising our choice as consumers and spending £8 out of every ton in Mr and Mrs Tesco's Corner Shoppe.

As for MFI, their reputation for poor products and unreliable delivery may be a major reason why, in a downturn in the housing market, their sales have plummeted.

Wecome to the free market. No doubt you voted for it.
12

,

27/11/2008 15:11:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Marian,

27/11/2008 16:09:55
What we are seeing is the ultimate confidence trick perpetrated – as Gordon Brown, with Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell pulling the media strings all around him - makes political capital to try and win an early 2009 election based on borrowing to create a sense of feel-good - knowing that disaster is surely ahead and being exacerbated by policies which are about his survival, and that of the New Labour government, certainly not about what is best for the UK.

When Gordon Brown claims that national debt is lower than many such countries, he is being less than candid. He knows he is excluding long-term liabilities such as £100 billion of private finance debt, our unfunded public sector pensions and the debts of Network Rail and Bradford & Bingley. Once these are taken into account, our true debt is nearly three times higher - at a shocking £76,000 for every household. The figures the Government uses to reject the charge of financial incontinence are as bogus as a fourpenny bit.

Personal debt, too, has risen to levels never before seen - up by 70 per cent in a single decade. It is now the highest of any leading economy: higher as a proportion of income than any G7 country has seen. The Labour Government wallowed in the feel-good factor of this easy money: it made it popular, won elections, so Labour let it rip. The IMF tried - repeatedly - to warn Tony Blair and Mr Brown of the dangers ahead, only to be told it was “mistaken” and “wrong”. It was not.

Gordon Brown glosses over these errors. The UK, he claims, is better placed than most to deal with the crisis. But, if the IMF is correct, that is yet another juicy piece of fiction: it believes the UK will suffer the deepest recession of any leading nation. The collapsing value of sterling suggests it is not alone in that view.

14

me150,

27/11/2008 16:35:21
OK #10, how would you deal wirth this then and how would you have prevented it from happening in the first place?

Before answering remember that if your response had actually been the route followed that there would have been consequencies.

So, let's hear your wisdom.
15

,

27/11/2008 17:58:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

gus1940,

Edinburgh 27/11/2008 18:20:13
I suppose this means big celebrations at The Scotsman.
17

Westfield Bairns,

falkirk 27/11/2008 21:45:08
Scotsman - Nulabor Ministry of Propoganda

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.