Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Put your hand up if you think these panels are really fists

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 May 2008
THEY have been compared to hairdryers, guns, question marks and even Scalextric controllers.
The oddly shaped panels on the outside of the Scottish Parliament have prompted much speculation, and have become a regular talking point on guided tours of the £414 million building.

But the latest claim is that the large panels, designed by parliament architect Enric Miralles, are actually clenched fists, intended to represent people power.

Angus Reid, a writer and film-maker, spells out his theory in the journal Scottish Affairs.

He writes: "It is remarkable that no-one has an explanation when the explanation is so obvious: they represent power, the power to change things and the power that comes, like sunlight, not from inside the building but from without.

"They are raised hands, and in that mass they resemble those forceful images of republicanism, a crowd of raised fists.

"The repetition of the fist motif amounts to a potent symbol of collective power."

He claims that Mr Miralles, who died before the building was complete, explicitly referred to the panels as "individuals" in a confidential report to the parliament.

Mr Reid also likens the layout of the building and its grounds to the shape of a right hand. "The ball of the thumb and the base of the palm correspond to the areas of open public access – the public foyer and the chamber.

"The other part of the hand – the fingers (the MSP office block], the thumb (the Canongate building] and the palm (the garden lobby and the towers] belong to the civil servants."

Mr Miralles' widow, Benedetta Tagliabue, has suggested the mysterious panels are like curtains at the windows. Others claim the shape was inspired by Sir Henry Raeburn's painting of the ice skating Reverend Robert Walker.

Officially known as "trigger panels", each slab took an entire week to install because the exercise involved five changes of scaffolding.

Professor Andy McMillan, former director of Glasgow's Mackintosh School of Architecture and a member of the panel which chose Mr Miralles, today dismissed the clenched fist theory.

He said: "I have always read them as people. I don't think it was ever meant to be a clenched fist. They are more like bodies.

"The clenched fist or raised fist doesn't ring a bell with me in Miralles' character."

Former Scottish Executive chief architect John Gibbons, who played a major role in the Holyrood building project, insisted Mr Miralles had no particular symbolism in mind when he drew the panels. He said: "He designed it as an abstract shape – it's one bit of the building that's not symbolic. I know for absolute certainty they are a geographic pattern.

"Part of the intrigue Enric enjoyed developing was getting people thinking and guessing.

"He would stir things up quite deliberately.

"He would be over the moon if he knew all of this discussion was still taking place."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2008 10:26 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Endangeredscot,

12/05/2008 11:35:24
I'm still not sure about the whole thing. One one had it is demonstrably a bold and thought provoking work of art. But you could say that about anything that mystifies. I am much more of the opinion that the thing is just doodles - dressed up in expense.
2

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 12:18:51
What a load of blethers.

It's the ugliest building in Edinburgh.
3

Scotish Exile,

12/05/2008 12:19:20
symbolism - just one big smelly turd if you ask me
4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 12:24:37
I thought they were just decorative panels shaped round the windows.
5

Dragonlord,

12/05/2008 12:35:14
Another arty farty clown with too much money and time on his hands.
6

Johnny Yen,

12/05/2008 12:45:29
Its the taxpayers that got fisted paying for that waste of space and the wastes of oxygen that inhabit it.
7

rossthelab,

12/05/2008 13:10:37
I think they look like ducks taking off from Dunsapie loch on a summers day. Picture the scene, and behind the ducks a lone piper plays the theme tune to River City, but the ducks get a fright and crap all over the piper who falls into the loch from the cliffs and is run over by a speedboat full of eastern european drain stealers.
8

,

12/05/2008 13:30:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Jenny MacArthur,

12/05/2008 13:38:14
It's a fabulous building, whatever the designs represent. Pity the mean-minded moaners who can't bear to admit what the rest of the world sees, that it's an architectural triumph.
10

James (1),

12/05/2008 13:47:40
Where is the design that shows the middle finger?

Thankfully the designer will not be able to fleece any more of the public.

Part of the intrigue Enric enjoyed developing was getting people thinking and guessing."
(Such thinking and guessing being "when is this idiot going to stop spending money like it does not matter" & "does this "architec actually have any talent"

"He would stir things up quite deliberately.
(It certainly looked like he took a big stick and stirred up his plans).

"He would be over the moon if he knew all of this discussion was still taking place."
Have no fear there will be a lot of people still "discussing" this mans "talent" for many years to come. The only danger of that stopping is if like his other designs it actually stays up.
He had a talent for spending money but not for designing roofs.


11

20something,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 13:49:39
Beautiful building. Truely iconic.
12

badger464,

12/05/2008 13:49:47
the building may be good but these things on the outside make it look like a 70's civic centre
13

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 13:57:49
#9, > It's a fabulous building, whatever the designs represent. <

Are we speaking about the same place? It would be a disgrace as the central feature of a 1960s council scheme!
14

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 13:59:15
#11, > Beautiful building. Truely iconic. <

No, no. The thread is about the Scottish Parliament building.
15

20something,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 14:01:16
Yes. Yes it is. The beautiful, iconic Scottish Parliament building.
16

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 14:02:53
#15, you mean the Parliament Hall near St Giles? Or the old Royal High School?

You can't mean the tacky set for Eldorado at the foot of the Royal Mile!
17

20something,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 14:04:59
Oh, I see. So something has to be old to be nice in Edinburgh. I don't think you would like the building no matter what it looked like, you had already decided you wanted it in an existing old building so wrote it off before it was built. Am I right?
18

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 14:08:28
#17, yes, of course. It's a mess. It looks the same as any 1960s council estate, but at the cost of £430 million. Hideous, crude, cheap-looking and nasty. The only consolation is that it'll probably fall down in 20 years or so.
19

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 14:09:01
#18, no, I've been round it. It was a dump. Tacky 1960s grot.
20

Finbarr Saunders,

12/05/2008 14:26:45
If these panels truly are clenched fists, they should be turned on their side to reflect what most people think of MSPs.
21

Scotish Exile,

12/05/2008 14:46:25
#9

Jenny, your guide dog must have sore paws!
22

me150,

12/05/2008 15:36:45
Who cares?
23

me150,

12/05/2008 15:53:42
#19, #18 said,

If you leave your prejudice at the door

You obviously cannot.

We could wait until all the SNP eejits are in then burn it down!!
24

me150,

12/05/2008 15:54:15
Yes my last comment is unsuitable and will be removed shortly.

he he
25

Bertie The Bat,

12/05/2008 15:56:04
looks nothing like a fist!
26

Brian M,

Edinburgh 12/05/2008 17:00:31
look more like a stack of toilet pans
27

,

12/05/2008 18:28:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 12/05/2008 22:43:56
'Fist' ... I hope that's not meant to be a euphemism for 'Hammer of the Scots' :0(

I hope that's not too oblique.
29

,

13/05/2008 01:33:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

Juan Handed,

13/05/2008 07:58:19
Well at least having a silly debate on some squiggles is better than having to confront the debacle his troo lurv has started in the parly. Nice avoidance of the issues Ian.
31

Juan Handed,

13/05/2008 07:59:55
It looks like artistic licence to spend 460 million quid for a concrete mishapen carpark like structure and have the brass neck to send in the invoice..
32

Em,

13/05/2008 15:06:52
Yes £414 million is a lot of money, but it is the Scottish parliament and quite an impressive building, though I think you need to see the interior in order to fully appreciate it, I can understand why it's not to everyone's taste but love it or hate it, it's an interesting building.

It's also worthwhile remembering that while the Scottish parliament was being built a mere office block was being constructed at westminster to house the offices of MPs, this thoroughly uninspiring building had a final cost of £234 million and with interiors that could be compared to that of a call centre this perhaps explains the need for £150,000 to be spent on decorative fig trees.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.