Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Margo puts the squeeze on Swinney for healthcare cash

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 February 2008
MARGO MacDONALD today said she expected the SNP to give Lothian extra cash for healthcare after she helped the Government pass its first budget.
The independent Lothians MSP voted along with the Tories in support of the SNP's £30 billion spending plans for next year.

First Minister Alex Salmond had threatened to resign and force an election if the budget was not approved. But in the end La
bour and the Lib Dems abstained, giving the SNP a 63-1 victory.

During the debate, Ms MacDonald said she had written to Finance Secretary John Swinney, arguing for an extra £11 million for health in Lothian.

She said that was the shortfall the area suffers because of the current funding formula.

And she highlighted pressures on maternity and accident and emergency units in particular.

Mr Swinney told the parliament the allocation of financial support to health boards would be announced in due course. But he added: "I assure Margo MacDonald that our joined-up Government is fully aware of the issues and pressures that apply in different health boards, such as Lothian NHS Board, throughout the country."

After the vote Ms MacDonald said: "I expect to hear in the near future that my very reasonable request has attracted favourable attention."

Ms MacDonald's support for the Government in the first vote on the budget last month has already won the promise of a "capital city supplement" to be introduced in next year's budget in recognition of Edinburgh's extra financial burden.

The budget paves the way for a council tax freeze across Scotland, abolition of the graduate endowment fee and the phasing out of prescription charges. Concessions by the SNP mean extra cash for police recruitment, more money to tackle climate change, a speedier introduction of business rate cuts, additional funding for bus services and the promise of a new drugs strategy before the summer recess.

The SNP accepted a Labour amendment which called on the Government to seek ways of expanding skills training and secure national minimum standards of service for vulnerable groups. But Labour then refused to back the motion, even though it had been changed as they proposed.

The sole vote against the budget was Labour backbencher Cathie Craigie, who denied she had pressed the wrong button.

Mr Swinney hailed the approval of the budget as historic and taunted Labour over its performance. He said: "They have a lot of thinking to do about how to handle the position of opposition and on this first crucial test in relation to the budget process the Labour Party has spectacularly failed in that respect."

Tory finance spokesman Derek Brownlee said the approval of the budget marked "the final humiliation of Scottish Labour".

But Labour finance spokesman Iain Gray defended his party's stance. He said: "The SNP government will now have to come back to parliament and say how they will address issues around vulnerable groups and skills but they cannot claim we endorsed their flawed budget."





The full article contains 502 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2008 10:43 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Spicey,

Glasgow 07/02/2008 12:12:50
Ms MacDonald's support for the Government in the first vote on the budget last month has already won the promise of a "capital city supplement" to be introduced in next year's budget in recognition of Edinburgh's extra financial burden.

What about the tens of thousands of highly paid public sector jobs that Edinburgh enjoys that the rest of Scotland doens't, providing millions in extra revenue? Is this not supplement enough?
2

mrmoneypenny,

07/02/2008 12:13:20
Good to see this is not a top story, the top story is a boy expeleed from school , lol.
3

Bob 2,

07/02/2008 12:14:56
Labour..sound like spoiled brats who haven't got there own way....time for Ian Gray and his chums to grow up.

Its called democracy.

Ian Grays comment is childish....why not just vote against it...In a funny way they haven't voted against it......

Ian Gray as a child must have been one of those kids, if he didn't get his own way when playing football, he would have taken the huff and went home with his football.

Grow up!!!
4

Farmernot,

oan ma traictor 07/02/2008 12:46:48
Wendy.....please stay......its better than the telly these days (FMQ's).....roll on the next joust where Eck will really rip her apart.....lol
5

Terr2,

07/02/2008 12:50:58
"Margo puts the squeeze on Swinney " Oooooh, you are awful......but I like you!
6

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 07/02/2008 12:54:45
#1 Glasgow has a higher per capita public sector than Edinburgh. Start moving them out of Glasgow first?
The actual percentages can be seen at the SE web site.
7

Gothic Rose,

07/02/2008 13:23:31
2#MrM. Re darling boy.Do you think Mr Hunter could take him on? Thier, facial expressions,would have me believe that, they may have, something, in common.
8

Rod,

Kirkliston - European Village jewel (2016) 07/02/2008 13:37:00
I support neither Labour or the SNP but agree that Alexander presents Salmond with an open goal at almost every FMQ time. Alexander has, without doubt, a very high intellect but is, in my view, hopelessly unsuited to her task at Holyrood.
The post-election petulance of Labour is as astonishing as it is disagreeable and will,I think, act as a recruiting sergeant for (principally)the SNP.
9

Hector Goodrich (Dr),

A&E 07/02/2008 14:56:11
Ms MacDonald is correct in mentioning the budgetary imbalance in health care. Lothian currently gets less per patient than does Greater Glasgow.
10

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/02/2008 17:47:34
"Margo puts the squeeze on Swinney for healthcare cash"

Is that unionist speak for Margo asked Swinney if he would consider putting in mair money for health care when he does his budget?
11

Andrew Allan,

07/02/2008 18:31:23
For all those who see high paid jobs and the revenues coming from them, don't forget this goes to westminster and not Holyrood.
12

The Answer,

Glasgow 07/02/2008 19:32:49
"11 Andrew Allan,07/02/2008 18:31:23
For all those who see high paid jobs and the revenues coming from them, don't forget this goes to westminster and not Holyrood."

Islamists would be proud of you!

Some facts


Scotland!

Population smaller than Yorkshire and The Humber (Y+H).

585,000 Puplic Sector workers in scotland!

480,000 Public Sector workers in Y+H.

85% of unemployed in scotland are white.

62% of unemployed in Y+H are white.

8% of new UK undergraduates educated in scotland

10% of new UK undergraduates educated in Y+H

11% of soicial security budget spent in scotland (mainly for white scottish)

7% of social security budget spent in Y+H (a large amount on muslims)
13

The Moth,

07/02/2008 21:21:41
Margo's braw.
14

Julian,

EDINBURGH 07/02/2008 22:25:34
Mrmoneypenny #2,

Acutally, the top story is about a boy excluded from school for thuggery.

Tomorrow's one is about a man who got 3 points on his license for speeding:-)
15

Julian,

EDINBURGH 07/02/2008 22:29:57
Hector Goodridge (Dr)

But surely the Glaswegians need more money per head for healthcare. Their lifestyles make it a necessity.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.