Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Festival of Politics - Special Report free inside The Scotsman

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Margo bargaining for more ahead of tight budget vote



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 February 2008
INDEPENDENT Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald today said she wanted further help for Edinburgh in return for her support in next week's final vote on the SNP budget.
She called on the Scottish Government to reverse its plan to move sportscotland's headquarters from Edinburgh to Glasgow. She also wants it to pledge full implementation of a new health funding formula which would hand Lothian an extra £58m.

The
Government's budget cleared its first parliamentary hurdle last month by just 64 votes to 62 when Ms MacDonald backed the £30 billion spending plans after Finance Secretary John Swinney promised a "capital city supplement" to recognise Edinburgh's extra financial burdens.

The arithmetic could prove just as tight when MSPs are asked to approve the final version of the budget on Wednesday afternoon.

The Tories, who sided with the SNP in the first vote, and the Greens, who abstained, are both demanding concessions before deciding what they will do.

And Ms MacDonald said the Government could not count on her vote just because she had backed them last time.

She said: "I am still hopeful a bit more can be coaxed out of the Finance Secretary.

"I want them to reverse the decision to move sportscotland to Glasgow with the loss of 80-100 jobs from Edinburgh.

"And there has been a review of the Arbuthnot formula for funding health boards which has recognised Lothian was not getting a fair amount. Altogether it would mean £58m more. I want that money paid in full."

The SNP announced last month it was going ahead with the sportscotland relocation to Glasgow originally proposed by the previous Labour-Liberal Democrat Scottish Executive despite warnings it could lead to a damaging loss of expertise.

Ministers said it made sense to base the national sports agency close to the site for the 2014 Glasgow Commonwealth Games, but critics have argued sportscotland's headquarters staff will have little involvement with the event.

The proposals by an independent committee for a new funding formula for health services, unveiled last September, would benefit Lothian because it takes more account of growing population. But no commitment has been given on whether it is to be adopted or not.

Ms MacDonald said: "I was very happy (Mr Swinney] agreed to the capital city supplement.

"It is clear there is still some fluidity in the eventual budget settlement, so I decided to see if we can achieve the same success on these other issues."

A spokesman for the First Minister said the position on sportscotland had been set out. He said changes to the Arbuthnot formula were essentially a health issue rather than a budget matter.

He added: "I'm sure the Health Secretary will be happy to meet MSPs to discuss issues around the Arbuthnot formula."



The full article contains 469 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 February 2008 10:15 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Brian Hill,

Edinburgh 02/02/2008 12:02:46
You would almost think Margo MacDonald had been in politics for years the way she is able to manipulate the current parliamentary system for the benefit of her constituents.

It's even rumoured she has voted for the SNP once or twice herself over the years so clearly she is putting her constituents above party whilst in Holyrood.

No bad fur a mere hoosewifie. Well done hen.
2

subrosa,

02/02/2008 12:36:38
# 1

Margo's already had more than her fair share of the cake for Edinburgh. She's still bitter in her dislike of Alex Salmond and John Swinney and still shows it. Pity she's put out this press release but then, she's nothing to lose, as she's standing down at the next election.

Her choice is does she want to be remembered as a good MSP or the person who thought they could bring down a minority government? Possibly the latter knowing her.
3

calum,

02/02/2008 12:42:23
So like most blackmaliers, having got her way the first time around she's now back for more. What a sad example she's turned out to be and what a dishonourable person. Not content with continuing to support the squander of £3/4 billion on a tramLINE which will only benefit a tiny proportion of the City, she's now denying the rest of Scotland the opportunity for jobs, investment and a handle on Government departments so that she can boost her own narrow agenda. What a sad, bitter example of minority politics at its worst.
4

Gothic Rose,

02/02/2008 13:04:06
I wish there were more like her.
5

Exocet,

02/02/2008 13:41:57
This survey will provide real evidence of how businesses are doing:-

http://Innthecold.com
6

alex paterson,

embra 02/02/2008 13:46:41
Good on yeh Margo git tore in tae them,yer playin a blinder,ora.
7

calum,

02/02/2008 14:34:43
#4, #6 I don't know if you know her or have dealt with her on a professional basis but I have. Any suggestion of taking a contrary point of view to her and the People's Champion image quickly turns to a vicious bully.
In addition, her "Edinburgh only" stance is at the cost of the rest of Scotland. If that is your politics then fine. But it isn't my idea of a Scottish Parliaments responsibility.
8

Gothic Rose,

02/02/2008 14:42:58
7#calum,You can`t hear the music? I am so sorry.:(
9

calum,

02/02/2008 14:47:48
#8 Explain please.
10

Liam,

02/02/2008 16:01:45
Calum, she's doing the job she was elected to do: representing her city. It's perfectly right that she demand the best deal for her constituents. She would be failing in her responsibilities, like most of the other Edinburgh MSPs, if she didn't.

It's not right that Edinburgh council taxpayers should have to foot the bill for events and activities that are national. Edinburgh is also a net contributor to Scotland in terms of distribution of wealth across Scotland. If any city in this nation of ours is draining our national resources and giving nothing in return then it's Glasgow, quite frankly. The politicians there have learned to play up that city's victim status to brilliant effect (just look at all the civil service jobs and investment they have won at the expense of the rest of Scotland!)

As for the trams, please get over it. Edinburgh's transport infrastructure is appalling, certainly when compared to Glasgow. A great deal more than £500m should be spent improving the capital's transport - and the beneficiaries will be more than just the people of Edinburgh. It will be the people who work and visit in the city too. Let's hope we see Lines 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the future and to blazes with the parochial idiots with a chip on their shoulder about Scotland's capital.
11

calum,

02/02/2008 16:24:49
#10 So the tramLINE in Edinburgh is going to benefit the economic, agricultural and industrial development in areas of Scotland where the transport infrastructure is chronically short of acceptable modern standards? The A1, A9, Western Bypass for Aberdeen, Borders roads, rural public transport... and all for for a tram in Edinburgh? I think you need to peek over the wall at the rest of Scotland, who are far from "parochial idiots" - what an insult to the rest!
As for Margo, I have experienced her bullying tactics first hand. I wonder how people from her real hometown feel now.
12

subrosa,

02/02/2008 18:26:12
# 10 (If you're not out enjoying the Edinburgh nightlife).

What a small minded viewpoint. Have you any idea of the amount of money poured into Edinburgh just because it's the capital city? Edinburgh doesn't offer me anything as a tax payer in Scotland (both income and council taxes btw). I can't afford the journey to the place or the prices the inhabitants seem to be able to afford and obviously the visitor is forced to pay.

Edinburgh can't even make its festival (the biggest in the world) be self sufficient!! Is there another festival anywhere that is subsidised to the amount of the Edinburgh one? That subsidy is running around £2m+ at present.

This city does not reflect Scotland to me in the least. Scotland is the country around it not in it as you appear to think.

As for Margo yes she is a bully. John Swinney will handle her I have no doubt. She isn't as smart as she thinks. In fact, all she's doing with this self promoting stunt, is to bring Edinburgers and their greed again to the fore of the real Scotland and I, for one, don't like it in the least.
13

druidh,

edinburgh 02/02/2008 21:40:08
I hope Margo votes down the budget and Salmond calls for another election. Hasn't she already promised to stand down at the next one?? LOL!
14

Julian,

EDINBURGH 03/02/2008 04:38:17
Calum # 2,

Nothing like a good bit spin to forward your argument. The tram line is budgeted at £560m not £750m. And 11% of the city (or 55,000 people) could not be classed as a tiny proportion.
15

Miss Jean Brodie,

03/02/2008 13:56:11
Matgo’s Little Englandburgh gets more than it’s fair share o everything - now let’s have some consideration for Scotland
16

calum,

03/02/2008 18:35:44
#15 So it's nearer £1/2 billion than 3/4 billion - that'll be such a huge consolation to the rest of Scotland. And I'll bet you that the final figure will be nearer mine than yours!
But the whole point about everyone else posts is that the upgrading of A9, A1 and M90 is based on safety, which is NOT the case with the tramLINE which is more a testament to political folly and pig-headedness than common sense and benefits no-one outside 6% of Edinburgh's resident population, a tiny figure.
17

Julian,

EDINBURGH 03/02/2008 21:43:25
Calum # 17,

Glad to see you've moderated your spin if not eliminated it completely. Actually, the contribution from Scotland, ie. The Scottish Executive you were complaining about is not nearer to half a billion, it is half a billion. And you can be rest assured, it won't go up, because The Scottish Executive have said they won't be giving any more funds.

And the number of residents who live within a five minute walk of the tramline, ie. those who will directly benefit, is 55,000 or 11%, not a tiny percentage.

Now that we've hopefully cleared up the facts, you do raise a bigger issue of whether the money should be spent on roads rather than trams. In my opinion, the road upgrades you mentioned have merit and should have been put ahead of the M74 extension.

There is a bigger issue though of whether there should be a seismic shift in favour of public transport spending. Those who won the trams argument have shifted it in this direction.
18

calum,

04/02/2008 06:26:21
And just how does the the money spent on the tramLINE have an economic, industrial, safety and developmental benefit for the rest of Scotland, that all of the other suggestions have?
19

Julian,

EDINBURGH 04/02/2008 23:41:57
Calum # 19,

Never said it did. Although the trams will benefit more than just those who live within 5 mins walk of them and more than just the people of Edinburgh.

OK, I agree the benefit will not be as Scotland-wide as the A9 or the other things you mentioned.

But what are you saying? That an infrastructure project like the trams should only be paid for by Edinburgh residents? That would set a very bad precedent. I do agree though that Edinburgh should pay a larger contribution.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.