Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

RBS Ambassador, Luke Donald

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lord Hardie is top of judges' list for sentence challenges



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 July 2008
LORD Hardie has had more convictions overturned and sentences successfully challenged than any other judge in Scotland, it emerged yesterday.
The peer, who was appointed to the bench in 2000, had 84 sentences and two convictions successfully overturned in the past five years — higher than any other High Court judge and ten times the average.

He had more than twice as many of his decisions overturned than the judge with the second highest number, Lord Dawson, the former solicitor-general, who had 30 sentences and three convictions successfully appealed.

Lord McEwan had the third poorest record, with 27 sentences and three convictions overturned.

Information obtained from the Scottish Court Service showed that between 2003 and 2007, High Court cases tried by 60 judges, two sheriffs and nine temporary judges led to about 520 successful appeals, including 40 overturned convictions.

However, a spokeswoman for the judiciary said Lord Hardie presided over more cases than many of his colleagues.

She added that almost every sentence was appealed now, many of these appeals resulting in reductions in the length of sentences, by a few months or a year, so Lord Hardie's position was not unusual.



The full article contains 202 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 July 2008 10:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

2Right,

On Location 07/07/2008 02:26:19
Old news stolen from the times yesterday
2

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 07/07/2008 09:57:43
To pick up what 2Right says, this story appeared in the Times yesterday under the banner "Hardie is worst judge". A totally subjective assessment, I would have thought. From the perspective of many, Lord Hardie is the best judge. Remember, most of the convictions emanating from his courts have been handed down by a jury, not by the judge himself. And the fact that so many of his sentences have been overturned or reduced by the Appeal Court actually speaks volumes in itself. Perhaps Lord Hardie has it right, and the Appeal Court is going too far down the liberal road? Back in the 60's Lord cameron vowed to hammer the razor and knife gangs in Glasgow. He did. It worked, Crime rates dropped. Now that we have a different regime, the crime rates are escalating, and unless the criminals are hammered again, they will continue to do so.
More power to Lord Hardie I say!
3

Chris,

Edinburgh 07/07/2008 10:33:03
#2: Totally agree. Good post. Some judges and many sheriffs seem to impose a sentence just below the level of appeal by the defence. Lord Hardie imposes a sentence that he judges fits the crime.
4

JG,

Fife 07/07/2008 11:52:40
#2 Curious Yellow
Absolutely right. There is a lot of hot air expelled about how we (as a society) need to be tougher on crime then, when someone tries to do something about it they are critised. Everyone agrees we should be "doing something" about knife crime so the government introduces stiffer sentences which aren't dished out. It's almost as if we're scared we offend the criminals who will be supported by their lawyers and we'll end paying compensation. Crazy!!
5

Old Cartha Boy,

07/07/2008 16:15:03
I'd impose some penalty upon the lawyer who brings forward an appeal that is lost - suspending them from practising for 6 months might make them realise their case needs to be one of substance.
6

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 09:47:24
#5 - not a bad idea, but the court has the power to increase a sentence if it considers the appeal to be frivolous!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.