Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


It's enlightening to honour the genius of Adam Smith

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2008
Statue's unveiling is long overdue and well deserved, says Alex Orr.
TODAY sees the righting of a great wrong as the "father of economics", Adam Smith, finally gets the recognition he deserves, with the unveiling of a statue to the great man outside St Giles' Cathedral in Edinburgh's Royal Mile on Friday, accompanied
by a host of associated celebratory events.

It is one of our great failings as a nation that we do not give those from our own shores the recognition they deserve, and it is often the case that those overseas are more aware of Scotland's famous sons and daughters than we are ourselves.

So here we stand with Adam Smith, one of the key figures behind the so-called Scottish Enlightenment.

Even by Edinburgh's standards, a decent interval has passed since June 5, 1723, when a smart lad entered the world by way of Kirkcaldy, arriving in Edinburgh in the late 1740s to deliver public lectures. Following stints on the continent, Smith was appointed to the post of commissioner of customs in Scotland in 1778, where he worked at the Royal Exchange and Custom House (now the City Chambers), living with his mother at Panmure House.

Five years later he became one of the founding members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, dying in the Capital in 1790. He was buried in the Canongate Kirkyard.

It was his work published in 1776, The Wealth of Nations, that marks Smith out as the genius he was, and is considered by many to be one of the most influential books ever written.

This was one of the earliest attempts to study the rise of industry and commercial development in Europe, and a precursor to the modern academic discipline of economics.

Promoting free market economics and capitalism, it greatly influenced the writings of later economists. This commitment to free trade was also tempered by a moral side.

Smith's opposition to slavery, colonialism and empire, and his statements about high wages for the poor and views that a common street porter was not intellectually inferior to a philosopher, pay testimony to this. The approval by Edinburgh councillors earlier this year of the bid by Heriot Watt University to buy Panmure House provides an opportunity to promote it as an international economic centre.

The decision over the building will now be scrutinised by the Scottish Government and it is to be hope it, too, sees sense and approves this bid. The restoration of this property will place Scotland at the international forefront of the study of economics, and bring substantial benefits to the national economy.

Adam Smith was, without doubt, a man of his times, a man who changed the world, and it is now ideal that this genius is getting the attention he deserves, after nearly three centuries.

Alex Orr is a board member of the European Movement and an Adam Smith aficionado







The full article contains 492 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2008 9:56 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

MisterN,

Scotland 04/07/2008 11:46:53
Adam Smith of course could never have been the genius he was without living within the Union. Had Scotland been Independent at the time of this great man he would simply have been an office clerk.

Scottish enterprise and genius another product of the union not to be found within an Independent state.
2

Findlay Thompson,

04/07/2008 13:18:08
Why is Adam Smith's profile depicted on english twenties?
3

I love to eat Sellotape,

04/07/2008 13:51:19
No, he was European.
4

Findlay Thompson,

04/07/2008 13:57:01
Ennnnggglish bank notes a currancy circulated primarily in the country of England. Is Britain not a county in the SE of England?

5

Findlay Thompson,

04/07/2008 14:00:52
A winning englishman comes from England, a winning Scotsman comes from Britain!
6

Silence of the Yams,

04/07/2008 14:52:37
#1 = gimp!
7

Douglas Eckhart,

Edinburgh 04/07/2008 15:32:49
#1

Nice try but Smith was a man of his times, ie a world of 18th century European colonial powers with England at the fore, so at that time he wouldnt have had anything against the Union.

It is ridiculous however to make out as if Adam Smith would be some kind of unionist hero if he were around today. We live in a different world today, a world of globalised economies, both large and small, and the later do very well thank you very much.

Nobody can be certain what Smith would advocate in today's world but it is a very different world from the British empire of the 18th century. e.g. Smith would now observe that there IS NO BRITISH EMPIRE in today's world. Being a radical, he may just advocate being a small independent competitive nation; afterall, we no longer have to worry about a southern neighbour freezing us out of all European, Indian and American trade routes or passing 'Alien Acts' forbidding Scottish trade in England, all of which resulted in a poorer Scotland that had no choice but to accept the Union. As stated, we now live in a different world.
8

Conan the Librarian™,

04/07/2008 21:23:29
10
Indeed, Douglas, though some Unionist thought on this matter is exactly the same as the Alien Act of 1705.
i.e.Be in a Union with us or we won't trade with you.

It's ma ba', ahm away hame.
9

MisterN,

Scotland 04/07/2008 23:14:38
10

You missed the point completely. We are constantly told on these blogs that Scots and Scotland could never have flourish outside of the union and that the enlightenment would never have occurred if not for the union. Scots somehow become dumber ambitionless complacent and incompetant outwith the union.
And if it wasnt for England carrying us for 300 years we would still be living in caves and drinking our Irn Bru from wooden challises.
10

Findlay Thompson,

07/07/2008 10:49:28
#9

Sorry Marc Antony you've lost me, and a few others I'll be bound!
11

Callum MacPherson,

Edinburgh 10/07/2008 18:48:32
MisterN, #1 & #12, I've never heard such nonsense.

Scots were just as ambitious, competEnt (spelling error, my incompetent friend) and successful in the centuries prior to the union, at home and abroad.

While every country suffers ups and downs there is irrefutable evidence to prove this. Just look at the artwork that was produced in Scotland even as the nation was forming in the middle ages. Look at the successful colonies in Poland during the 14th century. Look at the Scots language in literature during the Renaissance and at the court of James IV in the same period.

Yes the union, by way of the British Empire, gave Scots another platform on which to excel, as they did, but it was not the reason for their success.

Scotland, independent or not, has produced great men and women through the centuries, none greater than Adam Smith.

As #10 very intelligently points out though, there is no longer any need for or any justifiable benefit that Scotland receives from the union today.

It simply makes sense that in time Scotland will become a sovereign nation again.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.