Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Government reveals private sector plans to bail out Rock

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 January 2008
THE Government today announced plans to back a private sector rescue of Northern Rock.
The proposed solution will see the £25 billion of public money that was loaned to the crisis-hit lender converted into government-guaranteed bonds and sold to investors.

But the funding would be dependent on a "robust and acceptable" business plan
, the Treasury insisted.

Three private sector teams are vying to salvage Northern Rock – a consortium led by Sir Richard Branson's Virgin group, investment group Olivant, and the Newcastle-based bank's own management.

They now have until February 4 to submit their proposals.

Northern Rock was at the centre of the first run on a UK bank in nearly 150 years last September after its borrowing costs soared in the credit crunch, leading to the Bank of England bail out.

The bond scheme announced today has been drawn up by the Treasury's financial advisers, investment bank Goldman Sachs and given the go-ahead by Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

The Government had originally hoped that private sector bidders would be able to pay off up to £15 billion of the lender's Bank of England debts up front, but would-be rescuers have struggled to raise financing following the credit crunch.

Shares in the company sank to new lows last week amid fears that the group would be nationalised.

But today's proposals would see the lender selling a pool of its mortgages to a financing company, which would sell the Government-backed bonds in money markets.

It means the taxpayer will be exposed to Northern Rock for much longer than planned.

The Treasury said if none of the private sector bids are acceptable, Northern Rock would be taken into "temporary public ownership".

But the renewed hopes of a private sector rescue saw Northern Rock's share price leap almost 29 per cent in early trading.

The company was worth almost £5.3 billion at its peak in February last year, but has now slumped to less than a tenth of that level

The group was relegated from the FTSE 100 Index in December after the crisis hammered its share price.

Northern Rock said it "welcomed" the Government's preference for a private sector rescue. It added: "A private sector solution is also the board's objective as being in the best interests of its shareholders and other stakeholders."

If forced to nationalise Northern Rock, the Treasury stressed that all guarantees to savers would remain in place, but warned that shareholders may get nothing.

It said: "The principles for assessing compensation would reflect the principle that the Government should not be required to compensate shareholders for value which is dependent on taxpayers' support and the fact public sector ownership would be an alternative to administration."



The full article contains 462 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2008 9:58 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 21/01/2008 13:23:07
This deal almost certainly ensures that NR has now got an unfair advantage over the competition.
Surely that is against EU law.
2

Fairfax,

21/01/2008 13:41:48
"The proposed solution will see the £25 billion of public money that was loaned to the crisis-hit lender converted into government-guaranteed bonds and sold to investors."

This is the key point. This "private sector" solution is really nationalization in disguise. This is a cowardly decision by Brown's administration.
3

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 21/01/2008 14:02:13
I've heard elsewhere that the guarantee figure actually is around £50 billion (the figure of £25 billion was that which was loaned).

Lloyds TSB approached the government a few months ago desiring a £30 billion guarantee. So this seem a worse deal than that on the table before.

But hey, if you are going to screw things up, might as well make a thorough job out of it.
4

Fairfax,

21/01/2008 15:19:29
Cauchy Riemann (3): "I've heard elsewhere that the guarantee figure actually is around £50 billion"

The £50 billion is the total amount at risk to the taxpayer: £25 billion for the loans, the remainder being the NR mortgage book. Formally, this is considered part of the risk, although it's fairly unlikely that NR's customer base might default simultaneously. However, the total quality of NR's mortgage book is not clear -- e.g. its unknown proportion of risky customers with high LTV loans on property who might now have negative equity.

1's point is excellent: why is this not illegal subsidy under EU law?
5

Jimmy the Pie,

21/01/2008 16:16:00
And Broon crows about his excellent management of the economy!! He sold gold against best advice and lost billions, he's pawned the economy for decades to come with his PFI shambles, he pumps money into NR that will saddle the taxpayer for decades to come. He has lied about a referendum for Europe and made a right hash of the "October election" He's nearly in the Mugabe league!!
Roll on election day.
6

Allan(handofgod137),

21/01/2008 17:14:16
Hardly "private sector" if the taxpayer remains liable, yet another misleading headline.
7

henrymanchester,

UK 21/01/2008 17:59:53
Virgin Rock?

Northern Virgin??


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.