Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Farmers elsewhere reap the benefits as EU drags feet on GM



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Zero tolerance policies just make zero sense, argues Struan Stevenson.
GENETICALLY modified food was first sold in the UK in 1996. Californian-produced Flavr-Savr longer-life tomatoes were bought by British firm Zeneca, turned into a tomato paste and sold with little ado in supermarkets throughout the country.

The fi
rst whiff of hysteria didn't come until a few months later.

The tabloids alarmed us with headlines about "Frankenstein foods" and, as far as some people were concerned, a monster had been born.

Over the following years, a small number of GM crops were introduced into the UK and have caused no ill-effects to those who consume them. However, the EU still takes more than two years on average to license a perfectly safe GM product. In the US, the average approval time is 15 months. Now the EU is once again in the news for delaying its approval of GM foods – two maize crops and a potato with extra starch – by passing the decision on to the European Food Safety Authority, causing consternation amongst those waiting for their authorisation.

As consumers, we do not feel the impact of such time delays. But farmers, who are falling further behind in the world market as they are forced to feed their animals more expensive non-GM foods, are feeling this delay dearly. Scottish farmers are losing on average £20 for every pig slaughtered because of rising fuel costs and lack of access to cheap feed. There is a real danger that we will soon have no UK pig industry left. In the ten years from 1996 to 2006 the UK pig herd has fallen from 7.9 to 4.9 million.

On the other hand, farmers across the world are feeding their animals GM foods and, due to lower costs, selling to our supermarkets for a much lower price.

We import vast quantities of chicken, pork, lamb and beef reared on cheap GM feeds, which are outlawed in the EU. UK consumers happily munch away on this stuff while voicing their approval of "zero tolerance" policies in respect of GMs in Europe. It makes "zero" sense!

Purists say that we must not have beef, lamb, poultry or pig meat produced with GM feed, but the end result will be that we will have lost our industry to cheaper non-EU competitors, while we will continue to import meat from animals that have been fed on precisely the same GM feed that we have denied our producers access to. This is the politics of the madhouse!

If we really want to feed our citizens on Brazilian pork and Thai chicken, both of which have been fed on GM and are easier on the British purse, the present policies of zero tolerance on non-GM feed and the appallingly slow licensing of GM feed within the EU are exactly the way to go about it.

But if we want home-reared, healthy meat that comes from successful Scottish farmers, we need to relax laws on GM foods before it is too late.

Struan Stevenson is a Conservative MEP for Scotland and a member of the parliament's Committee on Agriculture.





The full article contains 539 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 May 2008 10:38 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

10/05/2008 12:39:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 10/05/2008 12:41:52
We have to wonder whether food prices would be exploding and people starving if the world had the benefits of what GM technology can offer food production.

Quite how a few bunnyhuggers hijacked the agenda is a mystery, but they're responsible for people dying right now.

If the EU insists on its luddite policies, probably to protect French farmers, we should quit the EU and steal a march on them by encouraging GM in Britain.
3

Jenny MacArthur,

10/05/2008 13:15:57
This idiot using terms like 'hysteria' says it all about his arrogant contempt for the public. It displays disgusting bias to so describe the public's perfectly reasonable concerns about this commercially driven technology whose benefits have been massively exaggerated by those with a financial interest in it (including the so-called 'scientists' who work on GM, who are too corrupted by being dependent on commercial funding to have the objectivity that term deserves). Anyone who reads the science knows that the only real benefits are to multinationals, and those in their pay. (Mr Stevenson? Had any 'consultancy' work in the area recently by any chance??) We need a rational debate, based on real science - not nasty politicians mudslinging against the British public with such loaded and one-sided arguments.
4

Fairfax,

10/05/2008 15:44:43
Jenny MacArthur (3): "Anyone who reads the science knows that the only real benefits are to multinationals, and those in their pay."

I'm a mathematician, not a biologist, but the benefits of golden rice seem to be positive, despite some of its early over-optimistic claims. [I have no financial link with any pharmaceutical company.]

"We need a rational debate, based on real science"

We do. For example, do you believe that all genetic manipulation is a priori wrong, or is your opposition to existing GM companies?
5

Allis Chalmers,

Crieff 10/05/2008 16:46:13
#1 and #3. Dangerous ignorance, but have it your way if you like, just as long as you're prepared to pay well over the odds for food.

You've been eating GM for years now, but I doubt if either of you have grown two heads. Or maybe I'm wrong...
6

Unimpressed one,

10/05/2008 18:25:19
"It displays disgusting bias to so describe the public's perfectly reasonable concerns about this commercially driven technology whose benefits have been massively exaggerated by those with a financial interest in it"

The public had no concerns about GM foods until the green bams such as Jenny MacArthur ranted and raved at hypothetical dangers of 'Frankenstein' foods. It didn't help that Greenpees aided by the loony soil Association, ripped up trials all over the UK. So much for "reading the science". Tw*at.
7

adsullata,

PDX 10/05/2008 19:07:15
#1 The Geniune Mario Antionette "Farmers are like pub landlords & taxi drivers - always moaning that they are hard done by. They want to try earning a living for a change."

It bothers me when people make comments such as yours. My parents own a farm and their powerbill for 1 (one) month was over $10,000 us dollars. Yes I did say for ONE month. I believe that would be close to 20,000 pounds in your neck of the woods. They are no longer allowed to burn their rubbish in the fields after harvest to keep the land as natural as they can and kill off weeds and blite, so they pay over $50,000 (isn't that 100,000 pounds?) for fertilizers and weed killer every spring, sometimes they have to spray twice. that is $100,000. With gas at over $4 (8 in your amount)filling up a tractor with a 50 to 100 gallon tank costs up to $400 per tank. Do that 2 or 3 times a week.

Now if my parents had sold out to a coorporation then these amounts would mean little, but they didn't.

I can only speculate that your family owned farms are in the same boat as ours. One family member working the farm the other working outside the home to have bennifits and bring in the extra money to put in the bank for when the crops fail and you have NO income.

Perhaps you should find out more about the people who grow the food for your table before accusing them of sitting on their laurels...

GM seed means more seed is produced in the same amount of space at no extra cost. Do I like it , no. But I understand why it had to come to using GM seed when the farmers can't farm and work within nature in their area.
8

me150,

11/05/2008 22:59:04
Does #7 not have his/her maths wrong?

UKP is about half USD not double.
9

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 12/05/2008 09:34:28
Eco-Fascists are the ones who have gotten us in the fuel fix we're in now:

Al "I'm the Father of the Internet" Gore and his friends in Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Friend of the Earth, et al, brow beat politicians here in the USA, until set asides and tax subsidies were made and then raised, so that a quarter (25%) of the US Corn Crop is now going toward producing Ethanol.

One tank of fuel for most minivans, would feed one human for a full year, using the same amount of corn.

Fields that used to be planted with wheat, oats, barley, etc., are now being planted with corn! Why? Because corn is about 150% higher in price than it was pre-subsidy legislation, which means that despite the marked rise in prices for wheat, oats, and other cereals (because of reduced supplies), corn still yields about twice the profit that any other crop will provide the farmer.

GM is just another scare tactic of the Eco-Fascists, and one that like Al Gore, is designed to make money for the EF's.

Gore is directly making money from the Ethanol fiasco, while the EF political groups see their bank accounts rise, every time they proclaim another crisis, or a 'real' threat from some company or corporation.

Wake up and smell the hypocrisy, graft, double standard, and scamming people: they're taking us to the cleaners and we are NOT getting any money found in our pockets back from them.

Cheers from the Rockies

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.