Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 7th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Calls for reform as royal fiancée drops Catholicism



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 May 2008
CALLS for an end to the Act of Settlement have been renewed after the fiancée of the Queen's grandson converted to Anglicanism in order to protect his succession to the throne.
Autumn Kelly, 29, confirmed she had renounced her Catholicism just weeks ahead of her wedding to Peter Phillips, who is 11th in line to the throne.

Although Buckingham Palace has insisted she did this of her own accord, the Catholic Church of Scot
land said the move highlighted that the anachronistic law needed to be changed.

A spokesman for the Catholic Church said: "This is nothing short of state-sponsored sectarianism. It has highlighted the discrimination inherent in the law."

Canadian Ms Kelly, who is due to marry Mr Phillips on 17 May, was raised a Catholic.

But Buckingham Palace said last night: "She was welcomed into the Church of England some time ago."

The spokesman could not give details of when this had occurred, adding that the palace could not speak for Ms Kelly as she was a private person.

However in August last year, Ms Kelly's mother, Kitty, gave permission for the Catholic Church to release records of her daughter's baptism in 1978, saying her daughter was proud of her religion.

The Church of St John Fisher in her home town, Pointe Claire, Ontario, declined to comment on her conversion.

If Mr Phillips had married a Catholic, he would have had to give up his right to be 11th in line to the throne.

Jim Devine, the MP for Livingston, who has called for the Act to be scrapped, said: "Clearly it would be naive not to suspect that somewhere some pressure came upon her over the implications."

Mr Devine said he was confident the government was moving towards reforming the 300-year-old Act.

For years the SNP has called for the Act to be repealed and Alex Salmond, the First Minister, has pledged to raise the issue with the Prime Minister.

Angus MacNeil, the SNP MP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar, said: "I wish them well but Peter Phillips has got as much chance of getting to the throne as a Dagenham dustman. If he was marrying a pagan, Satanist, Buddhist or Muslim, there would not be an issue, but clearly there is an anomalous discriminatory situation against Catholics."

The law – which also discriminates against women – has been labelled antiquated by MPs, and Gordon Brown has signalled that he would consider looking at reforming it.

Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, said "we are certainly ready to consider" reforming the Act and that he understood why people felt the ban was "antiquated".

Vera Baird, the Solicitor General, said that the entrenched right of males to succeed to the throne ahead of older sisters was "unfair" and "a load of rubbish". She also wants to repeal the law.

But the Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, recently played down the chance of this happening. A change in the law would require all members of the Commonwealth who have the Queen as their sovereign to pass the law through their parliaments, too.

CHURCH FEARS

THE Act of Settlement was passed in 1701, during the reign of William III (William of Orange), and its primary aim was to ensure that the monarchy remained with a Protestant – Sophia of Hanover – and her descendants. The 1707 Act of Union extended the act to Scotland. There was also the concern that if a Catholic became monarch, then this would lead to the disestablishment of the Church of England, of which the British monarch is the head. The act states that no sovereign "shall profess the Popish religion or shall marry a Papist".





The full article contains 618 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 10:11 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jimmy the Pie,

02/05/2008 00:14:37
Another complete non story. Who cares
2

Alfred E. Neuman,

02/05/2008 00:53:17
Oh my god! (The legally recognised god) Anachronism like this still exists? Good god!
3

Royster,

02/05/2008 01:02:00
A re-run of 'Kind Hearts and Coronets' maybe?
4

Teofilio Cubillas,

02/05/2008 01:18:10
Says much about him that he'd rather force his wife to be to renounce her religion than give up his line to the throne. That said, given his parents and uncles' track record on marriage, he's probably hedging his bets.
5

Scarlett Riley,

02/05/2008 02:51:22
Autumn Kelly's home town of Pointe Claire is actually in Quebec. It`s nowhere near Ontario.
6

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 02/05/2008 03:05:06
Ironic: "The Church of St. John Fisher", who gave up his head for his faith, while she renounces her faith for a small chance at the throne.
7

Kiumars,

Europe 02/05/2008 03:45:20
What is going on? Blair converted to Catholicism, now this lady converted to Anglicanism! Does religion and faith really mean anything to these people? People seem to change religion like they change their shirts!
8

Joseph Gibson,

Stevenston 02/05/2008 04:44:48
Ridiculous. Thats right, absolutely ridiculous that the catholic churh of scotland would use "discrimination". The UK was once protestant, now look at! it accepts all sorts of people from all religions and cultures while we must respect them and their laws while they! do not have to respect ours! Nonsense! Whether she did or did not do this out of her own will is no ones business, and certainly not the catholic church's business! And this bloody government has allowed too many RELIGIOUS MPS have too must free opinion in matters than are non religious! Our Monarchy will remain Protestant and not Catholic, not Islam and not any other religion, GOD! there are just too many false followers of the faith these day that they have to use it to their own advantage!

I warn most of you idoits out there that people aren't as dumb as they use too be.
9

,

02/05/2008 05:40:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Bob Christie,

02/05/2008 07:15:57
Abolish the Act of Settlement, abolish the Act of Union and abolish the monarchy all in one new Act of Scottish Independence. Simple really.

PS:#5

The (late) Queen Mother was NOT Scottish. That it is a myth put about by the royalist establishment. She was born to the Countess of Strathmore in Hertfordshire, England and was never domiciled in Scotland. She only holidayed at Glamis whist a youngster.
11

Scotland to prosper...,

02/05/2008 08:16:09
Here's an idea, why not just abolish religion? Never in the history of mankind has an idea caused so much anguish and suffering.

And don't start arguing that it brings joy and comfort to many, it's a crutch that people use to excuse their lack of ability to cope. If people put as much effort into researching cures for illness and giving aid to those in need as they did worshipping a man-made idea, the world would be a better place
12

bald eagle,

02/05/2008 08:25:13
This is rife throughout society, there has never been a catholic Hawick Cornet for example.

Why does this sectarianism exist these days when in reality very few people who perpetrate the catholic / protestant arguement even go to church or dare I say it even believe in god?

Have a look at the people involved in orange marches or the James Connely, do you think many of them go to church on a Sunday; no, most are probably spending the weekend in the pokey!!
13

Ian Abbott,

Lancashire 02/05/2008 09:09:14
Apart from highlighting the perpetual pantomime that is 'Monarchy' the part of this story I loved best of all was the ‘spokesman for the Catholic Church’ who says (with staggering pomposity) … "This is nothing short of state-sponsored sectarianism.” … what on earth does he think Faith Schools are?
14

Boy Wonder,

02/05/2008 09:40:55
Monarchy and Religion ... the twin pillars that support a society we would be far better off without.

Abolish both of them!!!
15

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 02/05/2008 10:03:34
Monarchy in its dying throes. The religion farce is just another example of anachronism and undeserved privilege.
16

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 02/05/2008 11:19:20
Indeed it is a myth that the Queen Mother was Scottish. Ethnically she was 77% English. She was less than 1% Scottish.

Diana on the other hand was 30% Scottish, through her Aberdeenshire granny, which makes Prince William 15% Scottish. His ethnicity is English 35%, Royal (too inter-related for an ethnicity) 29%, German 5%, Irish 4%, French 3%, others 9%. Much of Aberdeenshire are related to him through his northeast forebears, which included lairds, kirk ministers and weavers.
17

Helen,

02/05/2008 12:16:26
This just proves how essential it is for us to abolish the monarchy. No civilised society should have people holding such huge positions of power to which they were not democratically elected.
They are a bunch of parasites on the tax payer and seem to think they have a divine right to use tax payers resources such as RAF Helicopters to go to stag nights. Let's get rid of the lot of them and let people practice the religious beliefs they choose.
18

James,,

02/05/2008 12:57:49
It is outrageous that in the 21st century, a woman is forced to renounce her faith in order to marry into the Royal Family.

Labour made a big thing of ridding this country of discrimination, yet it still goes on, right at the very top of our society.
19

James,,

02/05/2008 12:58:36
And there is no "Catholic Church of Scotland."

Lazy jounalism.
20

,

02/05/2008 14:12:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Inappropriate name
21

forbietwo,

Cheshire 02/05/2008 17:34:33
'Scotland to prosper' had the right idea ".....If people put as much effort into researching cures for illness and giving aid to those in need as they did worshipping a man-made idea, the world would be a better place"...so why are we all competing over what dead asian male is the most suitable for forgiving us our earthly sins before we go to the big website in the sky....and why oh why are we all getting in a tiswas over these erelevant 'royals'that have free housing massive unemployment benefits mega allowances free transport (helicopters to stag night etc)& community care etc etc paid for by us taxpayers.
22

Frank Brady,

02/05/2008 18:23:09
If some of the anti-religion bigots here are representative of Scotland, then that age-old hatred, particularly of the Catholic Church, is alive and well and thriving, as Scotland attempts to become a mature and respected independent nation. Out of the depressing woodwork come the usual suspects, who believe in nothing, to spew their bile.

Joseph Gibson's sectarian comment "Our Monarchy will remain Protestant and not Catholic, not Islam and not any other religion, GOD! there are just too many false followers of the faith these day that they have to use it to their own advantage!" is typical of those he refers to as "idiots."

When will these people, who are such a blot on the country's face, stop embarrassing thoughtful Scots, and just go away?
23

Conan the Librarian™,

02/05/2008 19:30:12
1
Kind Hearts and Coronets comes to mind...
24

Brian M,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 21:03:23
Let us get rid of the so-called royal family.

Let them become citizens and taxpayers like the rest of us.

And remove the country from the expense of maintaining their many properties around the country.

And remove us from paying for their security.

If they want to maintain their position in the country then their sons should be up there at the front line facing bullets and bombs for months instead of 'visiting' for a few weeks and a photo opportunity and getting a medal.
25

SouthernGent,

02/05/2008 22:59:56
Question from afar:

Why are there any "royal families" still in existence, and since there are, why are there not more of them?

If I'm living in the UK, I'm declaring my own family to be royal just as these families did many years ago. If you all claim to be royal, maybe your "powers that be" will finally correct a long standing wrong. How can they possibly deny your claim since they allow the others to do so. It seems like the PC crowd would have a good case here.
26

Neil McCart,

Cheltenham 03/05/2008 19:16:39
It really is strange that the supernatural, and superstition should play any part in the matter of who is Head of State.
27

brythan@aol.com,

USA 06/05/2008 23:36:43
Why do you insist that she was "forced" to change her faith? No one every questions someone who converts to the Roman Catholic faith. Why do you suggest that a conversion to the Anglican faith is only superficial? Is that not bigotry on your part, suggesting that only Roman Catholics can be true believers?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.