Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Britain to back immunity for Sudan president in bid for peace

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 September 2008
BRITAIN is backing efforts to provide Sudan's president Omar al-Bashir with immunity from an expected genocide indictment from the International Criminal Court.
Foreign Office officials confirmed to The Scotsman that London is backing a plan to give immunity to al-Bashir, accused by ICC prosecutors of masterminding massacres that have claimed 200,000 lives.

The deal, which will be discussed this week at the United Nations General Assembly, would involve Sudan promising to make significant progress with peace talks, supporting the deployment of UN peacekeepers in Darfur, and holding war crimes trials of its own for lesser figures. "We're not getting involved in negotiations", said one British official. "There has to be a very substantial change in Sudan's cooperation."

London is supported by Paris, whose UN ambassador Jean-Maurice Ripert told news agencies that immunity was the prize that could be offered for Sudan agreeing to full inclusive dialogue.

Al-Bashir was accused of genocide in July by ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo, who says he was the mastermind behind a campaign of ethnic cleansing that has left an estimated 200,000 dead and two million refugees.

Since the charge was laid, there have been mounting calls for al-Bashir to be given immunity from China, Russia, the Arab League and, most recently, the African Union. But human rights groups are furious, and have launched a campaign of intensive lobbying at the United Nations seeking to get London and Paris to change their minds.

"We are expressing the strongest possible opposition to granting Omar al-Bashir a get-out-of-jail-free card," said Richard Dicker, international justice director of Human Rights Watch. "The Security Council made a commitment to bringing justice to the people of Darfur for horrific crimes, and to derail the judicial process would be a betrayal."

His organisation, and Amnesty International, are hoping to meet with David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, at the UN later this week and press their case, reminding him of the strong support Britain has previously given to the ICC.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has given strong support to the ICC in the past, in line with the Labour Party's public commitment to international justice. But Foreign Office officials have begun to despair at the lack of progress in Darfur and see the lifting of the indictment as offering them leverage. A mixed Africa Union and UN peacekeeping force is facing obstruction from Sudan as it tries to deploy, and peace talks between Khartoum and a splintering rebel alliance are stalled.

One possibility backed by London is that al-Bashir would end the obstruction and hand over two other ICC indictees, government minister Ahmad Harun and militia commander Ali Kushayb, who were charged last year.

The ICC was mandated by the UN Security Council to investigate Darfur in April 2005. But the Council has the right, under Article 16 of the ICC constitution, to suspend a prosecution if all members agree.

Supporters of the court argue that granting immunity to al-Bashir would undermine the value of the court. Former human rights chief of the UN, Louise Arbour, said giving such immunity would send a dangerous signal to would-be war criminals that justice is negotiable.

Rise of terror means UN needed more than ever, says Bush

GEORGE Bush, who once warned that the United Nations was in danger of becoming irrelevant, said yesterday that multinational organisations are now "needed more urgently than ever" to combat terrorists and extremists who are threatening world order.

In his eighth and final speech to the UN General Assembly, the US president said the international community must stand firm against the nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran. He said that despite past disagreements over the US-led war in Iraq, members of the UN must unite to help the struggling democracy succeed. And he scolded Russia for invading Georgia, calling it a violation of the UN charter.

"The United Nations' charter sets forth the equal rights of nations large and small," he said. "Russia's invasion of Georgia was a violation of those words."

Mr Bush, who has had a testy relationship with the UN, which he says has been slow to address global problems, called on it to focus more on results and aggressively rally behind young democracies like Georgia, Ukraine, Lebanon, Afghanistan and Liberia.

He said that instead of issuing statements and resolutions after terrorist attacks, the UN and such organisations must work closely to prevent violence. Every nation has responsibilities to prevent its territory from being used for terrorist, drug trafficking and nuclear proliferation, he said.

Mr Bush, who ordered the invasion of Iraq in 2003 without the UN's blessing, said: "The UN and other multilateral organisations are needed more urgently than ever."

He called for an immediate review of the UN Human Rights Council; a stronger effort to help the people of Myanmar live free of repression; and more pressure on the government of Sudan to uphold pledge to address violence in Darfur.

Opening the annual ministerial meeting of the UN General Assembly, Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General, warned that the global financial crisis endangers the organisation's campaign to fight poverty, as he joined a host of world leaders calling for global leadership to restore order to international financial markets.

The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, used his speech to the General Assembly to call for a summit of world leaders in November to examine ways to overhaul a "crazy" financial system in the wake of the crisis that has rocked global markets.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 September 2008 12:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 24/09/2008 04:19:18
Where does this granting of immunity end? Next thing is they'll be wanting to grant immunity to war criminals like Bush, Bliar, Broon and Putin, and immunity to practitioners of genocide, like the Chinese Communist Party politburo.

They should all be tried, and hanged.

2

scampy,

sri lanka 24/09/2008 05:18:28
Sudan is not a member of the ICC but the president can be charged with war crimes.
The chief prosecutor at the Hague Sr Ocampo has said that if Iraq becomes a member of the ICC Blair and Bush could face war crimes charges.
Blair and is former government are signed up members but no charges are being pressed against Blair.
Funny old court this ICC innit?
3

donald,

glasgow 24/09/2008 07:31:23
English Gordon of Kartoon.

Labour Governments have always backed tyrants worldwide.
4

Nevsky,

Moscow 24/09/2008 09:55:36
What a f**king disgrace.
5

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 24/09/2008 10:19:12
Your Prime Minister is very short-sighted and foolish in granting this immunity.

The guilty should be punished to the full extent of international law and this gesture by your Foreign Office - with the implicit consent of your Prime Minister - is despicable.

Also, those officials in Paris are just as foolhardy - but then what can one expect of the crazy frogs?
6

,

24/09/2008 10:19:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Alec M,

Falkirk 24/09/2008 10:43:03
Broon is surely thinking of the future - his own.

With Iraq in mind, "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours."
8

fritigern,

Inverness 24/09/2008 12:37:02
This is typical of the pro-Moslem and anti-white racism of the Labour regime. According to them the only war-criminals are Serbs. Bosnian Moslem murderers and war criminals, despite wanting to impose a hardline theocratic Islamic dictatorship on Christian Serbs and Croats, have been almost ignored by the kangaroo court in the Hague. Now the leader of a country which not only massacres its non-Arab citizens but still practises slavery is to be given an amnesty.

If there is to be an international court for war crimes it should apply to everyone, including the worst criminals of all :- Bush, Blair and their supporters Brown & Cameron.
9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/09/2008 16:15:39
Genocidal tyrants compound their crimes by threatening to rip their own countries apart by fomenting violence if they are prosecuted. This is blackmail of the most repulsive kind: these disgusting people hold the lives of many thousands of their own innocent citizens to ransom in exchange for immunity to prosecuation.

In pressing for immunity, both the British and French governments are caving into this blackmail, which is in every way as bad as granting a group of terrorists their demands in exchange for the lives of the hostages. In doing so, the British Government has demonstrated that it is willing to plunge to any filthy depths, and that it has no moral standards whatsoever. The correct response is the exact reverse: to hand the Sudanese government an ultimatum to say that unless Omar al-Bashir is handed over to the International Court, the UK will henceforth back the complete independence of the Southern Sudan in every possible way.
10

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 24/09/2008 16:25:28
Robert Mugabe has used exactly the same ploy in Zimbabwe: instead of going quietly he has held Zimbabwe to ransom, threatening to rip the country apart with bloody warfare unless he and his mentally retarded Zanu-PF acolytes are permitted to retain power, especially their grip on the Zimbabwean Army. Robert Mugabe should be facing charges of crimes against humanity. An appalling coward, he has proven that he is much too small and twisted a man to accept the judgement of the Zimbabwean people. It is shocking and reprehensible that this evil wretch should hold any power or position whatsoever. And now we have Mbeki: Mugabe's greatest crony, who has decided to rip South Africa apart by challenging his dismissal in South Africa's constitutional court instead of departing in peace and dignity. All these men are small, mean-spirited people, with a clear and evil understanding of how to use the threat of violence to secure their political future or judicial immunity. Disgusting, utterly, utterly disgusting.
11

Montford's Jaicket,

Hanging around 24/09/2008 16:53:53
#10 This is not only disgusting, it is outrageous. Everybody reading this acticle ought to write to their MP and MSP - of whatever party - and tell them to express their disgust at the proposal to give this odious person immunity. The actions of the Sudanese government, in giving at least tacit support to the militias who have slaughtered civilians in what can only be described as a racist policy is beyond reproach. We, as a civilised nation, ought to heap opprobrium on this Government and, far from giving immunity, we ought to vow that we will not rest until he, and those who support him, have been taken to the ICC - by whatever force is necessary - and given what they denied so many in their own land; a fair trial. A similar fate ought to await Mugabe and his acolytes for their systematic abuse and murder of the population of Zimbabwe. I am absolutely appalled that the UK government are even considering this.

http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/alcm.cfm
12

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA: for more War VOTE McCain 24/09/2008 17:53:46
5
TimW1234,
Ottawa, Canada,

Hey Dude do U have adequate influence, to persuade our US Feds to STOP attacking and jailing US citizens who want to smoke a spliff.

Like in ur country Canada, smoking pot is no big deal, and tolerated by Ur police. As it is in Holland.

Be nice dude, and no name calling in ur usual style.

Remember in my country the US we allow the masses to drink themselves stupid and die early deaths.

GC
13

Nevsky,

Moscow 24/09/2008 17:58:41
12 Galactic#

I suggest you take up drinking then.
14

grannie,

Glasgow 24/09/2008 19:33:39
This man deserves no immunity. Why on earth would we even consider this. It seems like saying jump through our hoop and you are forgiven. This serves as a way out for anyone with his type of government
15

Alec M,

Falkirk 24/09/2008 20:22:35
13 - I don't think the goon has stopped. His posts always seem drink-sodden.

Also, he's hardly an advertisement for US education, is he?
16

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 25/09/2008 07:58:48
Who IS this "GC" and why is he always picking on me.

Is it because I am Canadian and closer to him than other posters?

Why he brings in the issue of marijuana and drinking to this discussion completely eludes me.

Also, my comments were tame as compared to many, many others in this thread.

He is a work in progress and one day he WILL grow up.
17

Richard Lionheart,

25/09/2008 14:51:52
So this is what Gordon Brown means by “fair”.

If you are an African despot you get immunity from your crimes if you are a European Serb you stand trial.

Now that sounds equal and fair.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.