Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Arts projects given £8m worth of inspiration

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 February 2008
THE Scottish Arts Council unveiled an £8 million lottery pot yesterday to fund "inspiring" arts projects across Scotland.
Anyone from amateur dramatic societies to artists' collectives to mainstream arts bodies will be able to apply.

"Part of the excitement is we may enter the unknown here," said Jim Tough, the SAC's acting chief executive. "It's a unique opportunity
to come up with that really ambitious idea."

Projects that take the arts to children, the elderly, disabled or rural communities will be given priority, the SAC said. Initial proposals must be submitted by 8 May.

A major report in England commissioned from Sir Brian McMaster, a former director of the Edinburgh International Festival, last month called for "excellence" to be put at the heart of arts funding.

In contrast, the SAC's launch of the Inspire fund, was focused on "access", demanding "transformative projects" required to show "public benefit" and "lasting outcomes".

Three years in the making, the fund was embraced by the culture minister, Linda Fabiani.

She said: "I am particularly excited about the flexibility of this new Inspire fund, which will cultivate the best of Scottish arts, allowing creativity to flourish and reaching out to those not normally engaged in the arts."

The head of one SAC-funded organisation, who asked not to be named, said: "The Inspire material reads well, and it is saying all the right things. The danger is that the money goes to the usual suspects and yet ultimately has little impact on the ground."

Another critic complained that it "sounds like something left over from Labour days".

The £8 million over two years amounts to about a third of the £15 million in National Lottery funds distributed annually by the SAC. It comes from phasing out lottery funding for major capital projects.

The council cited research showing that elderly people or those with disabilities are 13 per cent less likely to participate in culture. In rural areas, 85 per cent of people participate in the arts, compared with 90 per cent across the nation, it said.

The SAC has suspended this year's Creative Scotland Awards, worth £30,000 to the winners. Officials stressed there was no connection with the Inspire fund, as the awards will be paid for this year by the Scottish Government.

The Inspire fund is simplified compared with targeted lottery funds in the past, said Iain Munro, the council's co-director of arts.

"It's really about the idea: it is a fantastic inspiring idea that's got creativity at its heart. That's what's important," he said.

Funding will cover 75 per cent of a project's costs.

SEED CASH FOR SUCCESS
THE NVA environmental arts group won £250,000 in Scottish Arts Council lottery funding for the Hidden Gardens project in Glasgow, launched with a light festival in 2003.

Creative director Angus Farquhar, veteran of major outdoor arts projects, called it the seed money for raising cash from 40 other funders. He said: "It sounds like this is moving in the right direction. If they have taken the cap off, that's good. It could lead to some very strong work being made in Scotland."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 February 2008 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 13/02/2008 04:33:31
I have a pile of bricks, on an unmade bed with a half cow on the top with one of its remaining feet stuck in a pharmacy cuboard ............ gies some money
2

eric,

Lothian 13/02/2008 07:28:42
Ive Put some sand ,Flip flops bags of crisps Rollercoaster ticket,empty Buckie bottles.
Subject Edinburgh folk fat folk with flip flops.
I desrve the cash.
3

donald,

glasgow 13/02/2008 08:55:52
I have a coo and a duummy Wendy. Do I qualify?
4

Reckless,

hffu 13/02/2008 18:51:56
1)Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy. Attacks on the people,other controlling acts, told we're in a ‘global war, the scare of vague ‘terrorist attacks to knock us off-balance and (run to the government)for protection.

2)Create a Gulag. Now that we're all scared so a prison system is made outside the ‘rule of Law.We support it because it's for “Them” but soon it becomes for “us”. Many are secret. Special ‘Court's develop and many of us could be caught without bail, lawyers or even trials)

3)Develop scary thugs.(have paramilitary scary men/contractors to intimidate people. Today these are to create fear. It's so-called ‘security to restore public order)

4)Set up an internal surveillance system.(spying on regular people. High visibility wiretaps, reading emails, tax intimidation and all for fabricated ‘national security)

5)Harass citizens groups.(Infiltrate normal citizens groups.Call them suspicious incidents and accuse them of potential terrorist's events which scares the hell out of regular people)

6)Engage in detention and release.(This is to scare ordinary people. You become a target for security searches without cause. If you support the constitution you're a potential terrorist. You're harassed over and over. Picked up and released. Picked up and released until you break and isolate. They win)

7)Target Key individuals (Threaten people with job loss that supports them. Launch attacks on university teachers if they don't support current ideological demands. This paves the way for the brutal ways that will follow soon and they are caught in a trap)

8)Control the press.(threats against life and limb if you don't toe the line… often wounded or killed. Real news is supplanted by fake news and you must report what is given you or suffer consequences. It gets so crazy you soon can't sort out the real from unreal.Citizens can't tell either so give up in stages since it reaches a point when nothing is credible.

9)Dissent equals treaso

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.