Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ship's captain freed after three pirates are killed in gunfight

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 April 2009
AN AMERICAN ship captain was freed unharmed last night as three of the pirates who held him for days in a lifeboat off the Somali coast were killed during a navy Seals operation personally ordered by US president Barack Obama.
Captain Richard Phillips was in "imminent danger" of being killed before US snipers shot three of the four pirates. The fourth pirate was in US custody last night.

"They were pointing the AK-47s at the captain," Vice-Admiral William Gortney, h
ead of the US naval central command, said in a Pentagon briefing. He added that Washington had rejected negotiations with the pirates. "The United States government policy is to not negotiate," he added.

Last night, Mr Obama said the captain had courage that was "a model for all Americans".

He said he was pleased that Captain Phillips was rescued, adding that the US needed help from other countries to deal with the threat of piracy and to hold pirates accountable. However, Somali pirates threatened revenge last night, raising fears of future bloodshed on the high seas.

Referring to last night's rescue and an incident last Friday, when the French navy freed a sailboat seized off Somalia, a pirate identified as Hussein said: "The French and the Americans will regret starting this killing. We do not kill, but take only ransom. We shall do something to anyone we see as French or American from now."

Captain Phillips was rescued yesterday in what US government sources described as a "swift firefight" that killed Somali pirates who had been holding him in a drifting lifeboat off the coast of Africa.

A senior US intelligence official said last night that another pirate who had been involved in negotiations with the FBI to free Captain Phillips, but who was not on the lifeboat, was being held in custody.

Captain Phillips, 53, of Vermont, was said last night to be "resting comfortably" on a US warship following his ordeal.

He was first taken on board the USS Bainbridge and then flown to the San Diego-based USS Boxer for a medical, according to 5th Fleet spokesman Lieutenant Nathan Christensen.

A family spokeswoman said Mr Phillips and his wife, Andrea, spoke by phone shortly after he was freed.

"You can all imagine their joy and what a happy moment that was for them," she said. "They're all just so happy and relieved."

When Captain Phillips's crew heard the news aboard their ship in the port of Mombasa, they placed an American flag over the rail of the top of the Maersk Alabama and whistled and pumped their fists in the air. Crew fired a bright red flare into the sky from the ship.

They remained on board the ship because the FBI has declared it a crime scene that needs to be secured. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said prosecutors were looking at "evidence and other issues" to determine whether to bring a case in the United States.

Captain Phillips has been hailed as an all-American hero after offering himself as a hostage to save his crew and then jumping from the pirates' lifeboat and trying to swim to a US warship.

Captain Joseph Murphy, the father of second-in-command Shane Murphy, thanked Captain Phillips for his bravery.

"Our prayers have been answered on this Easter Sunday. I have made it clear throughout this terrible ordeal that my son and our family will forever be indebted to Captain Phillips for his bravery," he said.

"If not for his incredible personal sacrifice, this kidnapping and act of terror could have turned out much worse."

John Reinhart, chief executive officer of Maersk Line, which owns the Alabama, the container ship skippered by Captain Phillips, said the US government told the company of the rescue at about 1:30pm local time.

Thanking the navy, FBI and others for helping in the release, Mr Reinhart said: "We join Richard's family, his crew and his colleagues ashore in celebrating this wonderful news. We look forward to welcoming him home in the coming days."

Before the rescue, military helicopters yesterday dropped supplies to the lifeboat.

Three US warships had been shadowing the lifeboat, which had run out of fuel, as negotiators tried to reach a deal with Somali elders, who wield significant influence with the pirates and had sent a mediator to sea.

However, negotiations broke down after American authorities failed to guarantee the pirates, who had demanded a ransom of $2 million (£1.4 million), a safe passage home if they returned Captain Phillips.

By noon local time on Saturday, the Americans had cut off communications with the elders in the town of Gara'ad, he said.

The pirates had been putting the captain on the satellite phone once a day to prove to American negotiators he was safe. Navy spotters also sighted Captain Phillips yesterday morn-ing, according to Maersk Line.

Aweys Ali Said, chairman of the Somali region of Galkayo, said he feared Captain Phillips had been tied down by his captors because he jumped overboard on Thursday night.

The Alabama docked safely in the Kenyan port of Mombasa on Saturday night. The American crew hailed Captain Phillips' courage for giving himself up so they could go free.

Military officials said the pirates fired on a US craft that approached them from the USS Bainbridge on Saturday. No-one was hurt and the craft withdrew without returning fire.

Captain Phillips was just one of more than 260 hostages being held by pirates, who have targeted vessels from oil tankers to luxury yachts in and around the Gulf of Aden. Pirates operating from Somalia are still estimated to be in control of about 17 vessels, six taken in the past week.

Somalia's fledgling government has asked for international help to tackle the pirates.

Pirates are friendly enough despite the death threats – just don't mention the 'P' word

YOUR best source is jailed. You track high-sea hijacks by text and e-mail. You get through to captors on a satellite phone but are then roundly abused. Reporting on Somali piracy can be surreal, writes Andrew Cawthorne.

While some in the world only woke up to the phenomenon with the first seizure of an American hostage, Somalia's modern-day buccaneers have been marauding off the Horn of Africa for years, taking hundreds of captives and millions in ransoms.

Covering their exploits is a near-daily task for reporters in Somalia and foreign correspondents in East Africa.

At times, like the saga of just-released American hostage Richard Phillips on a lifeboat with four gunmen, it becomes a 24/7 job, requiring moral judgments and canny journalism.

Our reporters in Somalia were able to contact Phillips' captors – on their fuel-less, floating lifeboat stalked by US warships – at the start of the standoff. They issued various defiant messages to the world in barked conversations.

Having then been informed, however, that their remarks were making instant headlines on TV networks across the world, the pirate gang became less co-operative.

"We are tired of your calls. We have no time for journalists," is a polite translation of some of the last quotes our team managed to extract from the pirates.

"If you bother us again, we will order someone in Mogadishu to meet you," a gang member added before the line went dead. Often, though, the pirates are friendly and helpful, though they detest use of the p-word. "We never kill people. We are Muslims. We are marines, coastguards – not pirates," one said.

Hostages say the pirates are normally as friendly as they can be under the circumstances. While they threaten to shoot or beat them if they do not co-operate, they also roast goat for their captives and pass phones around for calls home.

News of dramatic hijacks can often break by texts, sometimes in the middle of the night, from sources. On a warship in the Gulf of Aden, one journalist was first to report the hijacking of an Italian boat from staff who got a distress call then saw communications disappear in minutes.

One of the best sources on piracy in the region is Andrew Mwangura, co-ordinator of the East African Seafarers' Assistance Programme. Based in the Kenyan port of Mombasa, the body is a champion for sailors' welfare, essentially a human rights group.

Mr Mwangura believes some authorities in the region, and wealthy kingpins in places like Nairobi, Dubai and London, are complicit in masterminding and sheltering piracy. Last year, Mr Mwangura accused Kenya of trying to cover up the real destination of tanks on board a hijacked Ukrainian ship.

Mr Mwangura was labelled a "mouthpiece" for pirates by the Kenyan government, and went to jail on charges of giving "alarming" information and possessing a quantity of marijuana. He was later released, but the case hangs over him in what he says is a crude attempt to gag him from telling the truth.

Kenya's sensitivity over Mr Mwangura mirrors some of the moral ambiguities over covering piracy. Are journalists fanning criminality when they speak to the gangs, or adding to a necessary understanding of the phenomenon?

Answers, please, in a bottle on the Indian Ocean.

• Andrew Cawthorne is bureau chief of Reuters news agency in east Africa.





The full article contains 1553 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 April 2009 11:56 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Piracy
 
1

Alasdair mac Alasdair Mór Mac an Righ,,

13/04/2009 00:33:17
Glad the Captain was saved. Equally glad the pirates got shot.

"f you bother us again, we will order someone in Mogadishu to meet you," a gang member added before the line went dead. Often, though, the pirates are friendly and helpful, though they detest use of the p-word. "We never kill people. We are Muslims. We are marines, coastguards – not pirates," one said."

That pretty much tells its own story.

Who funds them? What are they trying to achieve? What do they use as justification for robbery?
2

EPS,

Edinburgh 13/04/2009 00:33:55
Thank goodness that the captain has been freed unharmed. That is quite rightly an occasion of great joy.

We must beware however of any suggestion that the killing of bad men makes the world a better place.
3

Jock MacSprog,

13/04/2009 00:50:56
the reason this nonsense has gone on for so long and has escalated to this point is that there are far too many dipsticks in this world like the journalist and appeasers who think the criminal pirates are "friendly" and that this was some sort of robin hoodesque harmless joke. Arm the crews, kill the criminal pirates, bomb their bases and mother ships and this problem will be over in a few months.
4

Alasdair mac Alasdair Mór Mac an Righ,,

13/04/2009 00:55:30
Why do we have navies and let a load of pirates steal millions.

Guard the ships. Destroy the pirates. War is war.
5

SW1,

13/04/2009 01:57:07
They want to make a one world navy under the united nations.......this is just the science of making the public want it......Yup that means you cant even go hide from this on a boat :)
6

Jim A,

13/04/2009 02:28:57
Well done the Yanks
7

East Coast Chick,

13/04/2009 03:24:02
Captain Phillips, thank you for your bravery! You're a true hero in my book.

To Mrs Phillips, I'm so happy your husband will be back in your loving arms soon.

To the Navy Seals who saved Captain Phillips's life, Thank You! Nice shot.

Sorry those fools had to lose their lives.



8

,

13/04/2009 03:38:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Finlang,

Switzerland 13/04/2009 03:40:37
#8 Jim A
The civilised world will agree with that. Eliminated deservedly like the dangerous gangsters they and their scum kind are.

The bitter and twisted P-poster (known to all even with his daily name-changes) on an earlier thread styles them as "brave" and "honourable" heroes. Classic dated and indefensible quasi-Marxist claptrap from the terrorist-appeaser-in-chief. Pitiful.
10

The Kids Are Alright,

13/04/2009 04:35:52
Superb work by the Navy Seals
11

Eoin Stewart,

13/04/2009 05:06:07
Thank God!

The only language these people understand is NATO 5.56.

Well done.
12

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 13/04/2009 06:58:50
#3 EPS "We must beware however of any suggestion that the killing of bad men makes the world a better place."

Well it certainly made that lifeboat a better place!!!!1
13

the REF's wee boy,

13/04/2009 08:12:16
Great result, arm every ship, if they hold to there threat destroy there bolt holes.

Would this appeasing government we have please take note there is only one thing all terrorists be they on land or sea know.
14

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 13/04/2009 09:07:46
Good result. This is the kind of response that pirates understand. No amount of throwing money at them was successful in appeasing them and making them go away.

I did hear about a proposal for a corridor past this coastline with anything found in it not passing the test at severe risk of being blown out of the water. Again this will be understood if enforced. The ships themselves need onboard armed lookouts who will take direct action if unauthorised attempts are made to board.

#3 EPS "We must beware however of any suggestion that the killing of bad men makes the world a better place."

Well it didn't work out too badly in WWII or you would be writing that in German. In this specific case it certainly made the world a better place for the innocent Captain Phillips who was to be killed imminently by "bad men".
15

albanman,

Edinburgh 13/04/2009 09:10:09
No.10 (Smith) Your write: "Some Scots like to sneer at the yanks but they forget how they took the war to the Japanese in the Pacific....." You need to check up on historical data; the Japanese started the War in the Pacific which led to the US entering the War. The way you worded your sentence implies that the Japanese were already in War beforehand, which is untrue.

As for the heavy losses you mention, no disputes that reality, but every nation lost terribly. If you're thinking of the Normandy landings during which the US suffered proportionately higher causalties than other nations, much of that was caused by the US rejection of specially designed equipment such as the tanks which were designed to run over barbed wire.

By the way, "Yanks" come from the N.E. of the U.S. and a huge amount of the soldiers who took part in D Day were from the Mid West and the South. Those from the South don't like to be confused with our cousins from the North and I'm sue Midwesterners feel the same.

Lastly, if you'r so concerned about the state of Scotland (and you rant about it enough in all your posts), why don't leave your tax-free job and cushy lifestyle in the Gulf and come live here? (presuming you are, indeed, in the Middle East).

16

albanman,

Edinburgh 13/04/2009 09:12:42
Oh - and good on the US for doing what should be done to pirates. One has to wonder what happens to the millions of $$$ that they get every year considering the standard of life in the region.
17

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 13/04/2009 09:54:22
We need an international court to trial these pirates and then automatic "life-means-life" sentences in high security jails when they are found guilty.

It would be easiest just to feed them to the sharks out at sea but the liberal PC brigade will get all antsy again.
18

Andrah,

Embrugh 13/04/2009 10:18:57
No doubt the BBC will be considering a no expenses spared Panorama special to investigate whether it was necessary to kill these poor pirates who are after all victims of western imperialism.
19

donnelly,

13/04/2009 10:23:39
#10 Smith aka Braindead ...totally agree with you Baggy #13 ...

What on earth were you gibbering about Smith .? ...think you have been drinking to much of the home made "hooch" out there mate
20

Weel Kent Jambo,

13/04/2009 10:25:42
Interestingly, Maersk is in fact a Danish company although it gives a high degree of autonomy to it's 'Regions' such as North America.

Rather than arming its crew members and risking their lives, the shipping companies could give instructions for their vessels to sail further out to sea out of range of the pirates, but then bunkers aren't cheap and time's money in the shipping industry so the crew's safety is compromised.

It's not just Somali pirates either and there has been an onging problem in the Straits of Malacca for many years. This is more under control nowadays as the Indonesian navy mounts extra patrols but this is not an alternative for a failed state like Somalia and it simply is not possible to patrol a vast area of sea such as the Indian ocean effectively.

#19 They buy better weapons and better boats and so it escalates and feeds on itself however the cost to the shipping company would be greater if they did not pay the ransom - do you have any idea what it costs to build a modern container ship, let alone what the contents of the containers onboard may be?
21

Russell M,

Stirling 13/04/2009 10:44:56
“Speak softly and carry a big stick."
22

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/04/2009 10:47:29
Desperate people do desperate things, the killing of these pirates won't do much to stop their equivalents carrying on the same way, death is fairly meaningless when life is meaningless too.

But Obama gave the right order and I am glad that the Captain is safe, he appears to have acted with dignity and honour.
23

quepasache,

13/04/2009 10:54:03
Steven Segall was obviously called in.
24

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/04/2009 10:57:19
26 Very funny, except it wasn't actually a film and the bullets were real. And it's Steven Seagal.
25

The Ayrshire Bard,

13/04/2009 11:04:05
#19 They simply expand their own empires of vice in the same manner that the drug barons of South America nd Mexico have done. These people are not Robin Hoods, they are vicious gangsters and thieves who must be stopped before piracy becomes a world problem again.
The taking of hostages is a despicable crime that must be dealt with ruthlessly. At least the Americans have the bottle to do this, unlike our weak and pathetic EU leaders. Before we got entangled with this bunch Britain would have proved her greatness as she did in previous years and stamped the problem out before it had time to escalate.
26

Antoine,

Far from the High Seas 13/04/2009 11:21:55
Not so very long ago, up till 1998, the UK retained the death penalty for piracy.
Last year the Royal Navy was advised, by the Foreign Office, not to even capture pirates as they could claim asylum if they came from some not nice place, say Somalia.
Only in a lunatic world could such a turn-round take place.
Any sensible, civilized person, would think that the best thing to do in the case of the Somali pirates is to take armed force to their bases and kill every man woman and child out of hand. An end to piracy and a salutary lesson to those who would interfere with innocent people going about their business.

It will not happen, since we have invented "human rights" to protect the vicious, the underhand, the dangerous, the lawless and the uncivilized.
And the decent, the inncocent, the law-abiding suffer and pay for it, too.

A fine world we have brought into being, eh?
27

Weel Kent Jambo,

13/04/2009 11:46:32
#26 Think you'll find France freed hostages taken on a yacht just last week so don't know where the anti-EU rant is coming from. Unfortunately the father of the family was killed in the crossfire so there's a lesson in there somewhere.

#27 Do you have faintest notion of the size of Somalia?
28

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/04/2009 11:47:24
27 Well in fairness I think that little children do have the human right not to be slaughtered out of hand.
29

the REF's wee boy,

edinburgh 13/04/2009 13:40:25
#29 In fairness little children do grow into the next generation of lawless scum, also if the warning goes out then it's down to the Male's in their families to look out for their welfare.
30

The Ayrshire Bard,

13/04/2009 13:51:44
#28 You're correct about the French although it appears the hostage was killed by 'friendly fire'.
However, the EU directive remains for non-violent confrontation with the pirates.
31

Richard Lionheart,

13/04/2009 14:11:52
"We never kill people. We are Muslims. We are marines, coastguards – not pirates," one said.

Enough said.
32

georgia, chloe's mommy,

somewhere outside chicago 13/04/2009 14:38:28
I am a liberal at heart, but I do believe in one's right to defend life, liberty, and property.

The Somali pirates have no right to attack anyone, regardless of their desperate situations. For the most part, the goods they have commandeered have been for the poor as well, in Africa - grain and other staples which are needed to fight starvation. So they are robbing from the poor to give to the poor??? I don't think so. They are robbing from the poor to give to the rich in a twisted version of "Robin Hood," and the terrorists for whom they steal are getting munitions money and probably giving the pirates themselves just a bit - double travesty toward the poor.

And now the pirates are threatening retribution for the killing of some of their own. Of course, it is very simple for them to threaten, since they have the weapons and a lot of the ships' crews are virtually unarmed. They have a lot of chutzpah, though, to threaten retaliation when all they would have to do to avoid death is to LEAVE EVERYONE ELSE ALONE!! They struck out, and the US and others retaliated, but now that should be the end of it!! (OK, so I am living in a dream world when I say that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!)

Despite my liberal views, I think they should bomb the little bu**ers out of existence and keep on doing it. There is no room on this earth for people who steal.
33

Observer,,

Glasgow 13/04/2009 17:44:47
31 No, I still think it's rather extreme to slaughter little children.
34

oder,

Scotland 13/04/2009 18:43:01
this has been a problem for while, the Americans said some time back that the would use force against the pirates if they attacked Americans or their ships, It was only a matter of time! the pirates made the mistake of thinking Americans would be like the Europeans and pay up,the Americans have lead the way in dealing with these pirates let see how many more American ships the pirates will hijack.
35

James C,

Linlithgow 13/04/2009 19:31:40
#37 Oder,
Wrong, the French have led the way in dealing with these Pirates.
To date they have used their own Special Forces to free two French ships, it is their act we should be following. Shock horror that the American effort gained the more publicity though.
36

oder,

Scotland 13/04/2009 19:39:23
James C,Linlithgow

maybe I should rephrase it! how many pirates did the French put permanently into retirement?
37

James C,

Linlithgow 13/04/2009 19:49:59
They've killed 3 and captured 6 so far.
38

Weel Kent Jambo,

13/04/2009 19:51:25
#37 Don't think you're right there. I reckon the pirate saw this big blue ship with Maersk writ large along the side and assumed it was Danish. Wotta a mistaka to maka.

Note that the crew of the ship had already sunk the pirate boat though so well done to them for that. Most crews are now trained in anti-piracy measures and good to see that one crew at least (there are probably many other unreported success stories) kept their heads and put their training to good use.

Bit different a commercial freighter sailing these waters to a family on a yacht who, it could be argued, were inviting trouble.

#32 There's nothing 'friendly' about the bullet that kills you!

#38 As no British ships have been involved thus far no-one actually knows what our response might be so let's knock off the knocking until we do, eh?
39

James C,

Linlithgow 13/04/2009 19:56:12
Several British ships have been attacked (some have not made it into the Mainstream Media for certain reasons), however British policy in this case is that of non negotiation.
The RN have their hands tied due to the updated Rules of Engagement they've received in response to the piracy threat.
I wouldn't expect much more than a long standoff, unless Brown wants to gain some Brownie points by being 'decisive'.
40

Barbarac,

Idaho USA 13/04/2009 20:33:24
The stealing of ships and the crews being made prisoners would not be happening if the ship crews were armed and allowed to defend themselves.
Self defense is allowed.
If the port is anti self defense then the captain could lock all arms while in port.
41

oder,

Scotland 13/04/2009 20:35:10
40 James C,Linlithgow

seems to me that having killed 3 that makes it equal! good for the French! not interested in the captured pirates no country has the authority to put them on trial!which means they will be back at the caper in the not to distant future, it will be interesting to see how long the French stay in the game.


41 Weel Kent Jambo,

too right! we don't only have the pirates to worry about the last lot of our sailors who were captured by the Iranians without firing a shot,I am sure the pirates will realise how foolish it would be to grab a British ship! you are dealing with people who believe actions speak louder than words, Brown! a man action? E mails seems to be his preferred option with someone else ready to take the fall, the British wont be doing anything now or in the near future.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.