Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Spector walks free after murder trial as jury fails to agree verdict

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 September 2007
MUSIC producer Phil Spector walked free from court yesterday as the judge declared a mistrial after the jury failed to decide if he killed an actress.
Jurors had to reach a verdict on who pulled the trigger of a revolver that went off in Lana Clarkson's mouth. There was no fingerprint evidence.

Prosecutors in Los Angeles now have the option to seek a new trial and a hearing was set for early ne
xt month.

Spector, 67, faced between 15 years and life imprisonment if found guilty of murdering actress Clarkson at his home in February 2003.

He denies the charge, and at the high-profile trial his lawyers argued her death was suicide rather than murder.

The jury had been deliberating since 10 September in a trial that lasted more than four months.

The foreman said they were split 10 to two - but it was not clear which way they were leaning.

The jury had already announced once that it had failed to come to a unanimous decision, on 18 September, when the panel was split seven to five.

"At this time, I will find the jury is unable to declare a verdict and I will declare a mistrial in this matter," Fidler said.

Spector, who came to court dressed in a black suit and red tie, showed little emotion as the judge told the jury they could go home.

Prosecutors said outside court that they intended to retry Spector for the shooting.

"We will begin immediately to prepare for a new trial," Los Angeles County District Attorney's spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons said.

Ms Clarkson, 40, died when a gun went off in her mouth as she sat in the foyer of Spector's mansion in the early hours of the morning.

She had met Spector just a few hours earlier at her job as a nightclub hostess and went home with him for a drink after work.

Defence lawyers argued that Ms Clarkson had personal problems and died of a self-inflicted wound that was an accident or a suicide.

However, Spector's Brazilian chauffeur Adriano De Souza said that on the night of her death he heard a "pow" and that Spector came outside with a gun in his hand and said: "I think I killed somebody."

The jury also heard from five women from Spector's past who testified that he long ago threatened them with guns when they tried to leave his presence.

No prosecution forensic expert was able to place the gun in Spector's hands.

But blood spatters on his coat and in his pants pockets were analysed by prosecution experts to suggest that it showed he was the gunman.

Spector did not testify, and prosecutors stated no motive for him to kill her other than her apparent decision to leave the house.

The defence offered forensic evidence that Clarkson killed herself - either intentionally or by accident.

Spector rose to fame in the 1960s with the "Wall of Sound" recording technique, which revolutionised pop music, and he worked with some of the biggest names in show business, including The Beatles.

But by the time he met Clarkson, he had aged into an eccentric, reclusive millionaire.

Clarkson was a statuesque beauty who idolised Marilyn Monroe but was beaten down by Hollywood rejection.

She was best known as the star of such B-movies as "Amazon Women on the Moon" and "Barbarian Queen".

But as her career floundered she became depressed and she was forced to take a job as a nightclub hostess to make ends meet.



The full article contains 598 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 September 2007 11:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Phil Spector
 
1

I'm no really here,

27/09/2007 08:41:58

Is he changing his name to OJ Spector?

2

Number 6,

Where am I 27/09/2007 09:05:24

So he has a gun in his hand , says "I think I killed somebody, and STILL he gets off. The power of celebrity, only in America.

3

AJ of Fife,

27/09/2007 09:46:56

Did the Brazilian chauffeur get the bullet?!!!!

4

Aoda,

NE Pa USA 27/09/2007 13:53:53

The judge ruled a mistrial, that means a hung jury, it does not let him walk. He was not proven either innocent or guilty and can be tried for the crime again. He did not walk free unless the prosceution will review the evidence and trial and decide weither to retry or not.

Reading this and other threads, I come to three possabilies. The trial was long and the deliberations were also long. 1. On Sept. 18 the vote was seven to five which is not unusual for the first vote.
2. The last one was ten to two and a hung jury.
Questions are,

Did a review of the evidence or the defence rebuttal change three jurors vote?

Are two holding out because the arguements of the other eight have not convinced them to change their mind? There has been instances in the past where one or two jurors not changing their vote has saved an innocent person being convicted eventhough the evidence seemed to say they were guilty. Those two questions show why I thing a jury system is the best offered today.

With a long trial and a long deliberation could have a negative impact on the trial. A few people will change their vote just to end it and get back to their normal life. That is to say they are easily convinced to chang but mostly want to end the inconvience of being on a jury.

One thing for sure, neigher side presented a clear case and the result was that the jury could not either determine that he is guilty or innocent without a reasonable doubt.

5

Aoda,

NE Pa. USA 27/09/2007 14:16:06

Sorry for any typos or bad grammer. New anti-virus and was giving me some troubles

6

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 27/09/2007 15:55:48

I think the jurors saw his wig, were appalled at its ugliness, and decided to get out of the court the quickest way they could by failing to decide on a verdict and thereby avoid looking at that loathsome thing.

Has there ever been such a "fright-wig" on public view recently? What WAS he thinking?

7

Silence of the Yams,

27/09/2007 17:34:22

I think this follows on from the ludicrous Michael Jackson aquital. You can't send a good celeb down!

8

busybee,

USA 27/09/2007 22:58:37

Don't worry everyone, times are changing in Hollywood, Paris, Lindsay, Britney, Nicole, they've all gone or will be spending some time in prison, maybe they'll finally get OJ...

9

2dogs in D.C.,

28/09/2007 18:45:18

Money walks?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.