Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fur flies as PETA takes exception to fashion exhibit

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 August 2006
A HIGH-profile New York exhibition about British fashion has come under fire from an animal rights group for using a Burberry coat trimmed with fox fur.
The campaign group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has written to the Metropolitan Museum of Art demanding that it remove the gabardine trench coat from the popular Anglomania show.

Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's president, said: "Disp
laying fur garments - especially fur items that serve to advertise goods that visitors can purchase just a few blocks from the museum - sends the unacceptable message that it's somehow acceptable to torture and kill animals for mere 'fashion'."

In a reply to the PETA demand to remove the item, Andrew Bolton, a curator at the museum, wrote that the exhibit featuring the coat had been partly designed to "reveal the moral discourse surrounding blood sports and fur fashions".

The label accompanying the item explains that such fashions reveal "the grisly reality of fox-hunting", Mr Bolton said.

The museum said the coat would not be removed from the exhibition, which is due to come to an end on 4 September.

Burberry is the sponsor of the Anglomania show, which opened in May to widespread acclaim following a star-studded launch party attended by the likes of the actress Sienna Miller and the model Kate Moss.

Ms Newkirk said: "Fox fur is not obtained from riders in pink coats, of course, so the Burberry part of the display seems to be a glaringly misplaced advertisement for a garment that can be purchased just up the street at the Burberry store."



The full article contains 288 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 August 2006 8:46 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: PETA protests
 
1

Doreen,

Glasgow 23/08/2006 07:48:43

People who wear fur look stupid, shallow and vain, why would an intelligent person wish to have an innocent creature reared in misery or trapped in some barbaric fashion then more than likely have their skin torn from them whilst they are still alive? I say rename Burberry 'Barbarity'.

2

faithless,

edinburgh 23/08/2006 08:29:36

in weelly cold places (think siberia etc) real fur is the only way to keep the chill out. I don't condone wearing fur for fashions sake but i would wear it if it was freezing my tits off till i was nearly froze

3

Doreen,

Glasgow 23/08/2006 17:49:19

I am sure you would Theresa however it would probably have been killed prior to being eaten. There is a lot of cat and dog fur in this country now, silly wee ornaments that cost one pound are in fact skinned cats. If you go onto the web you can find a vile film about the farms in China where the brutality is incomprehensible. Anyone who buys and wears fur is either ignorant or a revolting empty vessel.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.