Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Minister orders inquiry into organ donor 'opt out'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 September 2007
A CHANGE in the law on organ donation came a step closer today when UK Health Secretary Alan Johnson ordered an investigation into the idea of an "opt out" system.
He announced the UK-wide Organ Donation Task Force would explore the issues involved in introducing "presumed consent" - where medical staff can assume a dead person's organs are available for transplant unless the individual has stated otherwise.

The move was welcomed by Scotland's Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon, who said the work needed to be undertaken on a UK basis to avoid the risk of different systems developing in different parts of the UK.

She said: "We have always welcomed debate on this issue, since such a change would need strong backing by both the public and the health professions before it could be made to work.

"Organs available for transplantation are allocated on a UK-wide basis. It is for that reason the task force has a UK-wide remit.

"I very much share Alan Johnson's aspiration that organ donation rates in every part of the UK should match the rates in other European countries such as Spain."

And Lothians Labour MSP George Foulkes, who has been campaigning in the Scottish Parliament for a change in the law, hailed today's announcement as a major step forward.

His motion at Holyrood, calling for an opt-out system, has attracted cross-party support from MSPs including several who voted against the idea when it was debatedt 18 months ago.

Mr Foulkes said: "With Alan Johnson's announcement and given the growing support for my motion, the tide seems to be running in our favour north and south of the Border."

There are more than 800 Scots on the waiting list for transplants, but last year there were just 50 organs donated in Scotland.

Figures from UK Transplant suggest up to 90 per cent of the population are in favour of donating their organs to save or transform the lives of others should the situation arise, but less than 25 per cent of people are actually on the NHS Organ Donor Register.

Earlier this year, England's chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, signalled his support for presumed consent, although Scotland's chief medical officer, Harry Burns, has taken the opposite view.

The British Medical Association is among those eager to see a change in the law and it welcomed the task force probe as "good news". Dr Vivienne Nathanson, head BMA ethics and science, said: "We believe that when the task force looks at this issue in detail they will agree with us that a system of presumed consent with safeguards, will help to increase the number of donors available.

"At least one person dies every day while waiting for an organ transplant and we desperately need to change this.

"Before any changes go ahead however, it is essential that a public information campaign is launched so that people are completely aware of the choices they can make about organ donation.

"It is important that everyone realises that they will not be compelled to donate their organs but simply make their feelings known if they do not want to donate."

In February last year, Lib Demo John Farquhar Munro tried to amend legislation on organ donations in the Scottish Parliament to create an opt-out system, but it was defeated by 87 votes to 18.

But five of the MSPs who voted against the move have now backed Mr Foulkes' motion, which is also supported by Labour public health spokesmen Dr Richard Simpson, and SNP Lothians MSP Dr Ian McKee.



The full article contains 603 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 September 2007 10:19 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Organ donation
 
1

Simon S,

Edinburgh 20/09/2007 12:18:37

I currently carry a donor card but will replace it by an 'opt out' card if this change goes through, so in my case any change will reduce the availability of organs.

2

Edin,

20/09/2007 12:49:49

What a strange comment #1. So you would give organs but if you are pressumed to do so anyway you wouldnt want to.hhmmm. Sad world if we all had that view.

3

inter alia,

Edinburgh 20/09/2007 13:35:00

Excellent idea. If my dead body can bring relief to someone suffering [maybe more than one] brilliant.

4

Tim C,

Southern England 20/09/2007 13:51:42

I do not want the state to assume that it has rights over a person's body. During the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the iranian regime apparently took advantage of prisoners on 'death row' and drained all their blood before execution.
It is not difficult to imagine a situation where a road crash victim might arrive unconscious at a hospital. And a Treasury minister needs a transplant for a family member, so he/she quietly reminds the Director about budgets.
One answer is that we could arrange to sell our bodies in advance.

5

inter alia,

Edinburgh 20/09/2007 14:23:38

#4 Tim C: How were these bloodless bodies executed. I confess I have no medical qualifications at all, so forgive if I mistake the subtlety of your argument. As a layman I would have thought draining the blood of one's body renders one dead.

6

I'm no really here,

20/09/2007 14:39:48

Don't mind being an organ donor, but my decision.

This is another insidious law from a government that has the attitude that it's primary purpose is to "control" the citizens.

It is a very small step from the "Opt Out" system to the compulsory system.

"We need this persons body part!"
"He has an Opt-Out card"
"Just throw it away and pretend we never found it".

7

Colin,

Banff 20/09/2007 14:55:07

I tore up my organ donor card the second I found out that those nasty anti-smokers willingly accept my smoke tainted lungs, liver, heart, eyeballs etc etc etc.

And no, I haven't lost a moments sleep because of my decision.

Perhaps if they had been a little nicer to us......

8

James (1),

20/09/2007 15:00:18

Why must the government have any say whatsover on this? It is for the individual to choose. On principal I would refuse.
There is no argument that donors save lives! That said the donor wanted do this. Now everyone is being made to do it. That's wrong.
We are slowly allowing peoples rights to be erroded.
Done under the guise of helping others.

9

Johnwh,

20/09/2007 15:09:16

I feel the same way as Colin. This would stop us from giving a gift after death and change it to a tax with attemps of emotionall blackmail if you vote to opt out. But enjoy the debate as it brings awreness to organ donoring

10

MRab2,

20/09/2007 16:04:32

This government seems addicted to power and desperate to exand its own by any and all means. This is just another example; now we're all sacks of organs waiting to be harvested.
How long after the scheme is introduced can we expect the opt outs to be blasted as selfish and irresponsible? Perhaps their opt out status can be recorded on the ID card, making it easy to deny them medical treatment (after all, they're doing it to smokers now).
I realise there's a shortage of organs, but what have they really done about it? Where are the commercials? Where are the incentives? (1% off your NI contributions if you register as an organ donor). No, the government has shunned all the possibilities and when straight to the last resort. This is just more heavy handed legislation.
How much more can we expect and where?
As someone mentioned above, it's only a very short step from this, to mandatory donations.

11

sazz,

Edinbra 20/09/2007 16:09:21

I have a form of kidney disease which has meant numerous surgeries and stays in hospitals since the age of seven, and has also resulted in my being an organ card carrier since the age of eight :)

I am all for an opt out scheme as too many people die needlessly every day, all because people haven't registered with the service. Even if the deceased had made clear their wishes to be an organ donor when alive, if they aren't on the register, it's up to the family to decide. As I will probably need the kindness and sadness of someone else's organs myself in the future, why would I deny someone else the right to live after I a no longer here?

Don't worry, my kidneys are exempt lol!

12

Tim C,

Southern England 20/09/2007 17:32:30

Wish there was a hash key on this keyboard! No. 5 inter alia: this was a story I read about twenty years ago. Presumably when you have lost about 5 pints, the body shuts down a bit. When you recover slightly after a few days, then they could hang you. The blood was reportedly used for transfusions for Iranian revolutionary guards wounded fighting the Iraqi people.

13

Tombain,

Australia 20/09/2007 17:39:54

OK, how about if you don't opt in as a donor you don't qualify as a recipient ? why should anyone receive what they declare themselves unwilling to give? There is no reason other than selfishness to expect to benefit from someone's death if you would not yourself be prepared to allow someone else to benefit from your own demise. The only people who should be exempt from this would be those who are currently considered medically unfit do donate organs. They alone should be able to receive what they can't give.

14

livislosin,

20/09/2007 18:29:35

I`m a blood donor, organ donor and bone marrow donor, but now and again, but, #3, I`d like my live body to give relief to someone, but that`s another subject.
When you no longer need your organs, make the gift please.

15

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 20/09/2007 19:07:11

#10 MRab2

I agree with much of what you are saying, but I think the government are in for a big disappointment if this becomes a law as many people will choose to 'opt out'. One wonders if they will then try to over-rule the right to opt out, i.e. make organ donation compulsory.

While the technology is not here yet, it can only be a matter of time before genetic engineering of replacement organs becomes a fact and it is certainly true to say that there are at present several genetic techniques which can help to relieve suffering if not actually provide a cure.

16

Bill Crombie,

20/09/2007 19:31:37

When will people wake up and realise that this is not a question about compulsory organ donation, but about a New Labour government obsessed with control over its electorate. Your body is now deemed to be the property of the state.

In a similar vain to Colin of Banff, I, too, took the step of returning my blood and organ doner cards (duly torn up) to the DoH following the recent appauling decisions to refuse medical treatment to smokers. They can go and hang.

New Labour needs voting out before they take it upon themselves to remove your right to vote - think on.

17

mandyv,

banthisbanthatbantheotherland 20/09/2007 21:55:48

When I trusted the governments, the scientific community, the surgeons and the drug companies, I would have said yes to the opt out idea, I thought a long time ago that would have been the right decision.
I now trust none of the above.
The government have made it quite clear, smokers will have diseased organs, so mine willl not be fit for purpose anyway.
If that is the only time they will bother to operate on me, is when I am dead, they can stick their organ cards where the sun does not shine. If I sound angry, that is because I am.
I also tore up a donation card and made it quite clear to my Husband my feelings, when they decided to go ahead a put pictures on cigarette packets.
In this day and age of compensation madness, I could imagine my children being sued if the organs I may have donated started failing.

18

Owl,

Europe 20/09/2007 22:55:40

A doner is someone who gives of her/his own free choice.
Forced doning of which a person has to "opt-out" of, is an insult to humanity.
Love, care and humanity are all about freedom of choice.
They have nothing to do with this government and the control freaks which seem to abound in our sick political climate.

19

leith_man,

20/09/2007 23:59:04

I say you should only be eligible to receive an organ in the event of you needing it if you are willing to donate one.

20

,

21/09/2007 06:22:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.