Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Heart foundation backs organ fight

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 October 2007
SCOTLAND on Sunday's campaign for a "presumed consent" system of organ donation took a major step forward last night when the British Heart Foundation backed calls for a change in the law.
The move comes at a time when more than 7,000 people across the UK are awaiting transplants.

At present, only people who have signed up for a donor scheme can have their organs removed, but calls are growing for consent for donation to be presume
d unless relatives specifically object.

It is estimated that any change could see the lives of around 500 Scots saved each year.
Scotland on Sunday is campaigning for changes in transplant law that could save hundreds of lives each year. In the meantime, your willingness to become an organ donor could ultimately save a life. Join the NHS organ donor register by logging on to <a
Scotland on Sunday is campaigning for changes in transplant law that could save hundreds of lives each year. In the meantime, your willingness to become an organ donor could ultimately save a life. Join the NHS organ donor register by logging on to <a

Scotland on Sunday has been backing moves to change the law and earlier this month revealed how the chief medical officer, Dr Harry Burns, was "completely behind" the plan.

However, a spokesman for the British Heart Foundation warned that, if the move did go ahead, additional funding would be required to cope with the increased number of operations taking place as a result of the extra organs available.

Yesterday, Ben McKend-rick, policy and publicity officer for BHF (Scotland), said: "It is quite clear that the public supports this, and it is especially strong in Scotland.

"There has been quite a lot of interest after stories about waiting lists for operations which can transform people's lives. The Scottish people, in particular, appear to be very receptive to that."

But he added: "If the Government does move towards this change then it has to be backed up financially. That is absolutely crucial. It is very important to show that the money will be there for us to make the most of this change."

He said the majority of the population backed the idea of an opt-out system of organ donation but, at present, only a minority actually carried a donor card.

His views were backed by Labour MSP George Foulkes, who said: "I'm absolutely delighted to hear that the British Heart Foundation is now backing the campaign to change the law on organ donation.

"Both this Government and the one before it shied away from an opt-out system because they didn't believe there was enough professional or public support for a change in the law."

Last week, a British Medical Association survey claimed 64% of those taking part thought Britain should adopt the new system.

Dr Tony Calland, chairman of the BMA's medical ethics committee, said: "These figures demonstrate that support amongst the public is growing for presumed consent.

"We need to build on this support to ensure that people understand that there will never be compulsion to donate. There will always be a choice and people who do not wish to donate will be free to opt out."

Scottish Health Secretary Nicolas Sturgeon said:

"The Scottish Government believes that there is a need for a debate on the issue and the Organ Donation Task Force is currently looking at the area of presumed consent and will make recommendations to all UK health ministers."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 October 2007 9:05 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Organ donation
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 21/10/2007 01:45:04

Theres 'NO' supprise then!!, Just watch out on any Dark-Streets, you walk down in the futurre!!,
'Jekyll and Hyde', might just be, right behind you!

2

49th State,

in the dog house again 21/10/2007 03:23:33

Fighting with organs is not a very good idea. They could better be used to improve the lives of the seriously ill around us.

3

Boy Wonder,

21/10/2007 09:07:30

Organ Donation Task Force??

I see it going like this ...

"And how may I "donate", young ma ... I say, isn't that rather a long, wicked-looking knife in your ha ...."

Chalk up another heart donation! :(

4

Biker,

Ayr 21/10/2007 09:39:31

We could develop a good trade with China here. Whith them executing in excess of 17000 people per year (for organs?) I can see a gap in the market. Are you with me?
Boycott China and the olympics.

5

Charles Linskaill,

Chairman for the 'Babies-Union' 21/10/2007 10:42:25

WARNING!, WARNING!, WARNING!
Boy Wonder is building that dodgie Doctors Practice at the back of his house, he is even gona grow some kinda dodgie 'weed' so he said! on another thread! :-D

6

Dr Finlay,

Tannochbrae 21/10/2007 11:44:56

What many people don't realise is that improvements in car safety and the advent of compulsory safety helmets for bikers (thankfully)reduced the number of tragic young deaths from head injuries where the internal organs were uninjured, leading to a fall in suitable donor organs - as a result many other people died waiting for an organ.

Conversely the improvements in heart, kidney, lung and liver surgery means that many more people can potentially benefit.

If you have ever seen the improvement in the lifestyle of whole families when a successful transplant happens or seen the tearful pride in the eyes of grieving parents when they read a letter of thanks from a recipient whose life was saved by an organ from their dead child, you would not hesitate to agree that measures which increase organ transplant are to be welcomed.

These paranoid fools posting here really need to think about others less fortunate than themselves!

7

Charles Linskaill,

On the go on the mobile 21/10/2007 15:16:16

~8. Dr Finlay, no-one disputes that organ donation is not beneficial to all, what it disputed is the way it wil be controlled by the 'control-freaks' and the subsecant abuse, that will take place, you go live go your 'rose garden' al you want, we know the truth!

8

Boy Wonder,

21/10/2007 22:04:45

#9. I never mentioned "doctor's practice" once, Charlie ... you're reading things that aren't there again. Get back on your meds now!

9

Calum MacKellar,

Edinburgh 24/10/2007 08:00:53

I should indicate that Scotland already has a similar system to presumed consent system.

In Scotland, the Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006 has created a hybrid system between the explicit consent (opt-in) and presumed consent (opt-out) systems for the removal of organs from a deceased person for transplantation.

In other words, the proposed system in Scotland is of:

informed consent (opt-in) for those who register their wish to donate a number of organs before death on the NHS Organ Donor Registry or by carrying an organ donor card (though their nearest relatives may greatly add to this number of body parts being donated after death, without the informed consent of the deceased person, in conformity with Section 7 of the Act), and

‘soft’ presumed consent (opt-out), similar to the Spanish system, when no prior wishes of the deceased person are known. Indeed, the general thrust of the opt-out system in Spain enables nearest relatives to agree to the presumed consent from a deceased person to the removal of organs when they have no "actual knowledge that the adult was unwilling for any part of the adult’s body … to be used for transplantation" (using the words of the Scottish Act in Section 7).

However, in contrast to all other systems of ‘soft’ presumed consent in Europe in which nearest relatives usually tend to make the final decision, the Scottish Act does not enable persons, who wish to do so, to register their opposition to the removal of all or certain specific body parts after death. Indeed, the UK does not have a national register opposing general or specific organ donation.

In other words, a problem arises if a person does not know or trust, his or her relatives, characterised in Section 50 of the Act (and who may be just friends), concerning the decision to use his or her body parts after death. Indeed this person cannot stop his or her potentially unknown or unreliable relatives indicating that they


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.