Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Doctors to fight for change in law on organ donation

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 August 2007
DOCTORS' leaders have launched an action group to campaign for a change in the law on organ donation.
The British Medical Association will lobby MSPs to introduce presumed consent in order to increase the number of transplants carried out in the UK.
<strong>Scotland on Sunday </strong>is campaigning for changes in transplant law that could save hundreds of lives each year. In the meantime, your willingness to become an organ donor could ultimately save a life. Join the <a href="htt
<strong>Scotland on Sunday </strong>is campaigning for changes in transplant law that could save hundreds of lives each year. In the meantime, your willingness to become an organ donor could ultimately save a life. Join the <a href="htt

They are backed by the Labour MSP George Foulkes, who will introduce parallel private member's bills in the Scottish Parliament and in the House of Lords, where he also has a seat, in an attempt to pass a UK-wide change in the law.

Last night Foulkes and the BMA backed Scotland on Sunday's campaign for an opt-out system and called on ministers to seek the public's views on the matter. He believes support is growing for a situation where everyone is considered a donor unless they object in their lifetime.

The Scottish government has said it does not feel the time is right for a move to presumed consent. But England's Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson has signalled his support for the change.

A BMA spokeswoman said: "We are going to talk to the MSPs who have expressed views about this issue because the SNP has given a clear indication that they don't want to throw out the idea and there was a willingness to revisit it. We are now two years on from the previous public consultation, waiting lists are rising, and we think we need to ask the public its views again so we can move forward on this issue.

"We also need the views of the new MSPs because almost one-third of the parliament is new. We will be having various discussions and correspondence with them."

Foulkes said yesterday: "We have agreed to work very closely together on this issue. The best way forward is for me to introduce a parallel private member's bill in Holyrood and the House of Lords, which I am in a unique position to be able to do."

He added: "We have also set up an action group of MSPs, doctors and charities to identify and mobilise support. We need to make it evident that there is a lot of public support for this. We are also going to suggest that the Scottish government considers a new consultation exercise."

The number of patients on the waiting list for an organ transplant in Scotland rose from 702 in July 2005 to 818 last month. Yet the number of transplants dropped from 229 to 222 in the last two years.



The full article contains 422 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 August 2007 8:24 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Organ donation
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/08/2007 00:20:14

"quote"The Scottish government has said it does not feel the time is right for a move to presumed consent."quote"
DAMMED RIGHT! Why the "HELL" do the The British Medical Association have the AUDACITY to tell us what THEY want before asking us?
GET ST*FFED BMA! Don't presume! ask us the public first!
YOU ARE ARROGANT BA$T$RDS!
Scottish Parliament now's the time to stand-up and represent the Scottish People and not to be led-on by what we want to think about first and maybe debate!
What a bl**dy cheek the BMA have!

2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/08/2007 00:26:04

should say! not to be led-on by the BMA and listen to what we think first!

3

UriahHeep,

Edinburgh 05/08/2007 01:05:22

This is a diversonary tactic by the BMA.

Suddenly everyone realised that 'doctors' are being paid twice as much for doing half the work they were doing a few years ago.
No wonder they want you to think about something else.

4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/08/2007 01:20:54

#3 I agree! RATS have ways to make their own ends meet, but some of us can see through the perversion of the BMA!
And it "whitewashes" NO LONGER!!

5

Anne,

05/08/2007 06:16:43

I have a relative on the transplant list.
I suggest that those who don't feel they can donate should realise that if, in the future, they are in need of a transplant themselves, they should do the honourable thing and refuse.
The doctors are bthe ones who have to watch their patients die needlessly.
As for all those above -I expect you'll all change your tunes when you need medical intervention!

6

gfaBlack,

Your all right but...... 05/08/2007 07:28:04

#'s 1, 2, 3, 4,
If your loved one needed a new kidney or they would be dead in a week your views on tranceplants might change.

There must be countles wasted opportunities because a next of kin didn't know what the wishes of the dead were.

It should be compulsory for everyone to make their wishes known.
If you die then doctors need to know if they can use your bits n peices to help/save others.

It would be wrong to work off a presumed basis. Someone may have genuine belefs that prevent their participation in donations.

Everyone should be made to register their wishes and this information made available to the medical profession and any next of kin.

We have the ability to do this.

Black.

7

Guga II,

Rockall 05/08/2007 07:37:57

Nobody has the right to tell people what they can and can't do with their body when they die. What kind of dictatorial mentality do these people have? This is supposed to be a democracy; though with New Labour totalitarian, control freaks trying to run thnigs, it makes you wonder.

The Hootsmon, of course, supports New Labour, regardless, including pathetic jokes like Foulkes The BMA, as was pointed out above, are probably using this as a diversionary tactic to cover the fact that doctors are now being paid huge amounts of money for less and less work.

Why doesn't the Hootsmon support, and campaign for, an independent body to investigate medical malpractice? Its not as if we can trust the BMA to investigate their own.

Also, why doesn't the Hootsmon declare that they have opted out of unbiased reporting?

8

Boy Wonder,

05/08/2007 07:55:42

I don't require any kind of transplant. I don't personally know anyone who is in need of a transplant. But, if I die and my body is still in half-decent nick, I'd like to think bits of me can help others survive for many years to come. So I carry a donor card. My family know my wishes, and that I don't want them to go through having to make that decision .... so I made it for them. It's my body (at the moment) after all.

I think I'm for the opt out card rather than opt in. It makes sense to me!

9

UriahHeep,

EDINBURGH 05/08/2007 10:21:59

Black@6 -Whether a relative of mine needs a transplant is immaterial.
The point is that I regard 'Doctors" like any other tradesmen employed to do a job.
Their misplaced God complex results in this sort of arrogant pronouncement from time to time.
They need to be reminded that they're paid public servants and not medical experimenters in a Nazi death camp.

10

Chaplin,

05/08/2007 10:52:15

I'm for the opt out instead of the opt in.
I also agree with Anne #5, those that object to the scheme might change their views if the circumstances were right. Its distressing to think that there are patients dying because of the lack of donors, a situation that might change if the system changed.

11

AD in sunny Livingston,

05/08/2007 11:39:06

#1&2 Charles - calm down old chap! On a completely different subject - what we were on about the other day - have a look at this site:-

http://www.babycentre.co.uk/preconception

On the subject of the story, I think I'm also for an opt out rather than an opt in - if people feel so strongly about it surely they just opt out. I do feel that there are probably a great many organs going to waste and people thereby dying needlessly. I know that if any of my children or other family or friends were needing transplants I'd want the best result for them. I also don't understand the point in trying to hold on to parts of your body once you're gone.

12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/08/2007 13:00:17

AD sunny Liv, thanks for info.
On this subject, no-way am I against organ transplant, what I am against is bureaucrats assuming with arrogance what THEY want, and not putting it to a public vote first, or and very cheap for them have a well meant advertising campaign which would I'm sure bring Donors in their flocks.

13

Pilrig.,

Livingston 05/08/2007 16:35:05

6 - "It must be made compulsory for everyone to make their wishes known"

And if a person doesn't want to make his/her wishes known ?

14

Pilrig.,

Livingston 05/08/2007 16:38:08

the Big State owns our bodies/carcases anyway.

15

zofia,

Mexico 06/08/2007 01:31:24

I now live in Mexico. When I applied for my Mexican driving license I was asked if I wanted to be an organ donor. I said yes. The information goes on the back of the driving license. Also the driver's blood type.

16

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA Sun, Surf, Wine, Schrooms 06/08/2007 03:57:41

7. Guga II, Rockall /

Why are you blowing a gasket dude .

Your new leader Salmond and your SNP will fix all that for you dude...like the independence they say they will give you.

Kick back dude

GC

17

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA Sun, Surf, Wine, Schrooms 06/08/2007 04:13:19

8. Boy Wonder / 8:55am 5 Aug 2007

"But, if I die and my body is still in half-decent nick, I'd like to think bits of me can help others survive for many years to come. "

All talk dude.

You do not have the slighest idea what is involved in donating your cadaver.

Once the cadaver is taken to the butchers shop it gets cut up into parts . Those useful parts are chemically preserved and shipped all over the country.

A leg here, a head there, a heart some other place, a hand else where.

And when its all over they send back the cremated left overs in a little box to your relatives .

Several times in the USA when families opened the box, they and found small bones.

Further independent lab tests, found they were bones of cats and dogs and humans all mixed up.


Happy Haggis Day ..dude

GC,

18

Read This,

USA 08/08/2007 09:33:22

The Nasty Side Of Organ Transplanting
Available as a ebook or click on links in black box on left side of page
www.geocities.com/organdonate


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.