Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Half Price Tapas with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Why put a time limit on life-saving drug treatment for heroin addicts?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 May 2008
The only call for a "quick fix" in your report, "Call to cut the methadone quick fix" (26 May), comes from Professor Neil McKeganey, who would set a time limit on how long patients may be permitted to receive a medication that for many has been, literally, a life-saver.
Whoever heard of a time limit on any medication, for any illness? Imagine telling diabetics to get their act together – stick to a diet, exercise, etc – but whatever happens, they'll be cut off from insulin after two years. Or refusing to continue c
holesterol-lowering medication after a specified period on the assumption that patients must be expected to learn and follow optimal dietary guidelines. Or telling alcoholics – even those who have responded extremely well and managed to maintain sobriety – that two years of Antabuse (or AA meetings) is all they'll get.

Addiction is a chronic medical condition. This was the gist of the Rolleston Committee report 82 years ago, and has been reaffirmed repeatedly ever since, including by such authoritative bodies as the World Health Organisation. Surely Prof McKeganey could not be so blinded by wishful thinking that he fails to realise his proposal would result in virtually all of the "terminated" patients returning to the streets, to heroin, to crime, to getting – and spreading – HIV and other potentially lethal illnesses. One can only pray that the ministers will show more compassion, common sense and understanding than the professor. At stake are the lives of countless individuals and the wellbeing of the entire community.

(DR) ROBERT NEWMAN, MD
West 57th Street
New York City, New York


Professor Neil McKeganey recently recommended the introduction of an arbitrary limit on the duration of methadone treatment. In 2004, the World Health Organisation, Unaids and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime released a joint statement endorsing methadone and buprenorphine treatment. In the same year, the WHO added methadone and buprenorphine treatment to its essential drugs list.

Methadone treatment is one of the most frequently evaluated treatments in medicine. It has been found to reduce substantially drug overdose deaths, HIV infection, crime and heroin use while also improving social functioning. If Prof McKeganey's advice is accepted, Scotland can look forward to soaring drug overdose deaths, HIV infection, crime and heroin use while the social functioning of injecting drug users will deteriorate.

The UK already has one of the highest rates of drug overdose deaths in Europe, with higher rates in Scotland than England.

Methadone and buprenorphine treatment should be treated like any other medical treatment. That is, policy and practice should be based on evidence, not on whim. There is no evidence to support Prof McKeganey's advice. If his advice is followed, then some additional drug users may only become drug-free because they have died. This is not what medicine should be for.

(DR) ALEX WODAK
Director, Alcohol and Drug Service St Vincent's Hospital
Darlinghurst, Australia




The full article contains 497 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 May 2008 8:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Mikey,

27/05/2008 12:33:10
The fact is that drug addicts, especially illegal drug addicts, have made a lifestyle choice. They make themselves addicts and then complain about not receiving treatment!

How much money is wasted each year on these people?
2

Shrink,

Dundee 27/05/2008 13:02:29
Mikey - how consistent are you going to be on this one?

Do you object to money being spent on people who have made a lifestyle choice & been lifelong smokers? how about those people who have made a lifestyle choice & are overweight, eat poorly & don't exercise? how about people who have made a lifestyle choice to play sport & have sports related injuries?
3

thomas taylor,

south west scotland 27/05/2008 18:50:20
the letter is very misleading. The medical model used is at least forty years out of date for most practitioners. The examples used bare no resemblence to reality. Narcan with addicts is closer to Antabuse with alcohol dependency. Surely Methadone should be used to give some stability to someone allowing them to more easily make choices that would help them change their lifestyles. If it is to be used for harm reduction it is then more substitution for heroin rather than treatment. Then the question has to be asked when does effective intervention become collusion helping the person maintain a maladaptive lifestyle
4

Percy Menzies,

St. Louis, MO 27/05/2008 19:32:20
The debate about methadone has raged unabated for forty years. Patients should be given treatment choices including staying on methadone. We have three distinct and highly effective medications - methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone. Naltrexone was the first non-addicting, non-habit-forming medication developed to keep detox heroin addicts from relapsing to heroin use. Many patients want to get off methadone and buprenorphine and go on naltrexone as an 'insurance'. Sadly, because of poor compliance this medication is rarely used and restricted only for 'motivated' patients like physicians, pharmacists, nurses etc. At our clinic we have used this medication with great success by treating it like methadone - direct observed therapy and the results are impressive. It is time that policy makers and treatment provider learn to use the new class of medications - non-addicting. We have already achieved this in the treatment of alcoholism. To improve compliance the US FDA approved a once-a-month injeabtable form of naltrexone, although presently it is approved for alcoholism only.
5

Geraldine Mullins,

99 Brede Street, Geraldton. Western Australia. 65 29/05/2008 09:37:04
At no time have the loopy Dr. Newman or Dr. Wodak openly declared to their media aparatchiks their vested interest - academic or otherwise. Both are deeply committed and funded by billionaire, so-called philanthropist, George Soros for the legalisation of cannabis,heroin,cocaine,ice,meth,ecstasy,etc.In Australia Wodak is noted as an extremist who has lost the plot.To understand Drs. Newman and Wodak's agenda just google each name and Harm Reduction.Wodak has lost all credibility amongst his fellow medical colleagues.Wodak does not care how much collateral damage he causes to Australian families through his all-consuming passionate rant for the unsubstantiated and unsustainable drug legalisation hyperbole.Perhaps Wodak can 'fess up and tell us what controls he would suggest for the retail of the above-mentioned drugs. What would be the legal age of purchase and what agency would monitor the strength when street drugs are retailed?Would the outlet be known as a narcotic retailer or would the drugs be just on the shelf at your local supermarket?Of course in Australia Wodak has already floated his plan that cannabis could be sold at Post Offices or in this electronic age through machines such as ATMS.What's your poison,Dr. Wodak?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.