Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Free Monet Print with The Scotsman

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tourist website has to be worth a visit



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

UP UNTIL a few years ago, a website was seen as an adjunct, a marginally useful sideline to the main selling and marketing operations of commercial organisations.
But websites have since moved rapidly centre stage. A vast army of consumers now looks to websites to provide a fast, efficient and reliable one-stop shop. Not only is all the up-to-the-minute price comparison information expected, but the means of m
aking an immediate purchase or booking online.

For VisitScotland, making the transition from useful adjunct to centrepiece booking tool for millions of visitors to Scotland was always going to be challenging. Its ambition to encompass the widest array of tourist requirements across all of Scotland was highly dependent, not only on technological quality and expertise, but also on a consensus across a vastly differing range of catering and hospitality providers as to needs and requirements.

Many small hoteliers who subscribed in good faith to the VisitScotland service were to be disappointed at the results, particularly when it referred many potential visitors to the agency's own call centre rather than the hotel or catering establishment directly. That the website helped to facilitate millions of bookings – VisitScotland.com had 11 million customer visits, including repeat visits, last year – was proof to its management that it was providing a vital service. Others measured its failures and judged accordingly.

Now the six-year-old website, which has run up cumulative losses of £1.5 million, is to be scrapped and replaced with a new one from 2 April. It will feature, inter alia, a visitors' guide and online travel shop. For a mechanism so central to the continuing prosperity of a key part of Scotland's economy, this development will be warmly welcomed. But there are particular reasons for hope that the new website will be a success.

First, visitors will be able to contact hotels and B&Bs directly rather than having to reserve through a call centre via the site's own search engine. It will allow users to browse over 14,000 providers and shop for travel tickets and tour packages. Second, the changes introduced draw on the latest technology and have been designed and crafted in response to detailed surveys of customer and user needs. VisitScotland has worked closely with the industry to agree significant and far-reaching changes. Direct contact details will be shown clearly on the site as well as new online booking facilities. And third, it has even won the tentative approval of its predecessor's most persistent critic. Those who were pressing for change are strongly supportive of what is now being planned for the launch. This offers a real prospect that the new website will meet the needs of tourist service providers.

VisitScotland.com is a global door into Scotland. Its service, its quality and its reliability, have to be of the best.



The full article contains 484 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 February 2008 11:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 23/02/2008 06:44:09
Visit Scotland are a joke and a new website is not going to change this fact.
A lot of visitors to Scotland think that Visit Scotland are an independant organisation who will give them complete and impartial information.
The truth is that they only represent those who pay their extortionate fees.
Why else have people been deserting them in droves for the last 20 years or so.
2

Upbeat,

23/02/2008 10:39:03
Time will reveal if this window dressing will have any benefit.

6 years ago only the minority of tourism related businesses were online having invested in their own websites. The situation is now very different. Today very few tourism related businesses in Scotland will be without their own web presence.

On the internet the need for business portals and links has been addressed by a host of hotel,travel, B&B, retail association, local enterprise, trade lists, etc. This wealth of alternative avenues for any business to draw attention to its operation reduces the dependence on any one portal .

Visit Scotland will have to do very well to attract back those Tourism businesses in Scotland that felt disenfranchised 'extorted' and alienated in the first place.

The truth remains that while for Scotland VS might be seen as a useful tool for overseas marketting of Scotland as a Visitor destination , there are a hugh number of small operators across Scotland that will not be wasting their money by walking back into the clutches of particular Quango. No superficial window dressing by VS will now change this. The reason is not hard to find -Trust and goodwill were sorely abused in the money grubbing early days.
3

subrosa,

23/02/2008 12:29:03
I have 'dealt' with visitscotland for some years now as I have two rooms for bed and breakfast guests. The only reason I stay with them is because of my 4 star grading which I would lose.

My bill for this year for a 20 minute visit from a less than professional quality insurance 'inspector' is £153 and then I opt to pay for inclusion in a local publication at the price of £110. That is going to stop this year.

My main argument with this organisation is the fact that kitchens are not inspected as part of their quality assurance (this applies to B & Bs and guesthouses). Establishments are given points for areas I disagree with entirely and not for others which I consider essential to a guest business.

Having managed 5 star hotels in Europe during my career I think this organisation has had far too many chances now. Really I can't be bothered working out how much their website has cost the taxpayer but the disaster of their first one was £17million I remember.

Time the whole thing was restructured.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.