Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The benefits of becoming a status symbol



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 July 2008
The Antonine Wall has now joined the World Heritage premier league. Martyn McLaughlin predicts a tourism boost
IT IS an accolade which places an ancient Scottish ruin in an élite group whose members include the Taj Mahal, the Great Wall of China and the Pyramids of Giza.

This week, the Antonine Wall officially became one of Britain's most prestigious and sacred attractions when it was granted World Heritage Site (WHS) status by the United Nations cultural body, Unesco.

The decision to bestow the rare title on what once formed the north-west frontier of the Roman Empire marks a successful end to a five-year campaign and has been hailed as a monumental recognition of Scotland's heritage.

Erected almost 2,000 years ago, the barrier runs for some 39 miles, stretching from Bo'ness in West Lothian to Old Kilpatrick in West Dunbartonshire. Although much of it was destroyed over time, sections of the fortification can still be seen at several points.

It is hoped that its newly elevated status will bring about a renaissance in visitor numbers to stretches of Scotland hitherto unknown to international tourists.

Linda Fabiani, the culture minister, said the move by Unesco "reinforces the wall's international status", while Des Browne, the Secretary of State for Scotland, said it "helps to secure our place as a world-renowned cultural destination".

But can a mere label – albeit one bestowed by an impressive organisation and shared by grand company – really have any practical impact?

Unesco's pedigree is unquestionable. Its belief in international co-operation regarding ancient, special sites is more than a half-century old. It was the body that orchestrated the successful 1957 resiting of the Egyptian temples of Abu Simbel, a feat of archaeological engineering which brought together about 50 nations and cost £20 million.

The WHS initiative itself is more than three decades old, having been ratified in 1972 to protect those cultural and natural sites considered to be of "outstanding universal value". The establishment of the World Heritage Committee (WHC) comprised a rotating group of 15 nations – the number has now swollen to 21 – and a World Heritage Fund (WHF) which, from its headquarters in Paris, is designed to provide loans and technical assistance.

In practice, however, the scheme has not always matched the grand theory.

In terms of material benefits alone, then, the conferral of the WHS tag upon a property or destination might be seen as no more than an honorific title. Unesco provides little in the way of technical assistance to successful nominees.

Financially, too, it is constrained. With a portfolio of more than 800 registered sites, the organisation has an annual budget of barely £2 million – the equivalent of just £2,300 for every WHS.

Unesco itself is aware of the limits of the fund – comprising compulsory contributions from WHC state members and voluntary additions – describing its budget as a "modest sum, considering the magnitude of world heritage needs".

The Antonine Wall will therefore have to rely instead on hand-outs from other heritage and archaeological bodies, which, it is hoped, will be impressed by its new position as the fifth WHS site in Scotland.

Yet what WHS status may lack in terms of direct financial assistance, the organisation argues, is amply compensated by the prestige of the title.

Though money may not come directly from Unesco, newly listed sites find recognition of their standing attracts tourists.

There are no solid figures proving an upturn in visitors as a consequence of WHS status – nor, indeed, any tourist numbers for the Antonine Wall in any case – the circumstantial evidence is strong, with attractions across the world claiming increased footfall as a result.

That is a possibility which is exciting those who fought for the Antonine Wall to be designated a WHS. As Margaret Hodge, the minister for culture, creative industries and tourism, said yesterday, Britain's natural and man-made sites of heritage are "the number-one reason overseas visitors cite for coming here".

Falkirk Council has reason to be cheerful. Some of the best preserved remains of the wall run across its territory, from Roughcastle, near Bonnybridge, in the west, to Kinneil at Bo'ness in the east.

Adrian Mahoney, the council's convener of environment and heritage, said the WHS status would bring the eyes – and wallets – of the world to central Scotland.

"Gaining WHS status is a major achievement and focuses international attention on our area," he said. "There's no doubt the recognition will attract more tourists to the area, keen to find out more about our Roman history, which can only help our local economy, particularly hotels, restaurants and tourist facilities.

"We only have to see how Hadrian's Wall has helped to boost the profile and fortunes of northern England," said Mr Mahoney. "Hopefully, the Antonine Wall will do the same for central Scotland."

The wall's best locations have already been made accessible – sites at Falkirk, Kirkintilloch and Bearsden are signposted and open to public viewing – although it is not possible to walk its entire length, given that parts are based in farmland, or seemingly disappear into industrial areas.

Ultimately, preservation of the wall is paramount, with Unesco carrying out regular inspections of WHS every six years. The official inquiry ordered this week into Edinburgh's WHS, amid concerns surrounding development in the Old Town, shows that conservation is at the top of the organisation's list of priorities.

WHS does not alter the legal status of the Antonine Wall. The remains of the frontier are already protected through the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 and the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, while the buffer zone is already designated as green belt or countryside land.

It does not mean no development can take place near the wall, but any which does must take account of its importance.

Bodies involved with the wall want to start improving access and educational facilities, but this is at an early stage.

Doreen Grove, Historic Scotland's head of understanding and access, said: "Historic Scotland, the five local authorities and major landowners along the wall work together as a group to address the access and interpretation of the wall.

"We are currently looking at the best ways to improve the presentation of information about the wall, on and off site, as well as developing proposals for improving access and parking."

Preserving Scotland's historic sites

ST KILDA


St Kilda is a group of five remote islands, Hirta, Soay, Boreray, Dun and Levenisha, in the North Atlantic 100 miles off the west coast.

The islands were permanently inhabited for at least two millennia, but were evacuated in 1930. The only residents now are military personnel.

They were inscribed as a World Heritage Site in 1986 for their natural heritage. In 2004, this was extended to include its surrounding marine environment and the following year, after a successful re-nomination bid relating to importance as a cultural landscape, St Kilda became one of the few World Heritage Sites to hold dual status for its natural and cultural qualities.

EDINBURGH OLD AND NEW TOWNS

The Old and New Towns of the capital were inscribed as a cultural World Heritage Site in 1995 in recognition of the character of the medieval Old Town and the Georgian planned New Town. It covers both the Old and New Towns together with ancient milling settlements on the Water of Leith. Key features include landscape, urban form and architecture, and history and heritage.

However, Unesco is said to be concerned about the potential impact and handling by the Scottish Government of Caltongate, a sprawling new development in the Old Town, which was approved despite about 1,800 objections.

A team of Unesco inspectors will visit Edinburgh later this year to assess the site's "state of conservation".

NEW LANARK

New Lanark is an 18th-century restored cotton mill village on the banks of the River Clyde, and was inscribed as a cultural World Heritage Site in 2001. It was created as a cotton-spinning village in the late 18th to early 19th century and was transformed under the management of Robert Owen.

THE HEART OF NEOLITHIC ORKNEY

The Heart of Neolithic Orkney was inscribed as a World Heritage Site in 1999. The site is composed of the chambered tomb of Maeshowe, the Stones of Stenness, the Barnhouse Stone, the Watchstone, the Ring of Brodgar and associated funerary monuments and stone settings, and the Skara Brae settlement.

The full article contains 1408 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 July 2008 10:10 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jwil,

09/07/2008 00:32:22
Thank goodness the Antonine wall is getting a mention at last. The English Broadcasting Corporation are forever telling us that Hadrian's wall was the edge of Roman civilisation.

I hope that BBC Scotland will do a documentary programme on it.

2

subrosa,

09/07/2008 00:43:21
I do hope publicity material is quickly made available so as local people can visit before the influx of visitors.
3

Beth Boyle,

NY 09/07/2008 06:51:08
I did not know about this. Thank you!
4

Douglas Eckhart,

Edinburgh 09/07/2008 09:54:43
As a member of the Antonine Guard, a Roman living history society that has long campaigned for the Wall to be given WHS, I can say that this is great news.

However, in order for there to be a 'surge in visitor numbers', the surviving visible remains of the Wall must be cleared of obstructions and decent signage must be provided as well as adequate protection and preservation.

The current situation is dire quite frankly. There is no clear signage at the Falrkirk Wheel for Rough Castle fort, and would-be visitors are left to scramble over fences and find their own way there by hit or miss, as what little signage there may be is unhelpful.

Also, large sections of the Wall itself, such as the approach to Castlecary, is obstructed by landowners who have fenced it at regular intervals along its length, and placed barbed wire across gates (I kid you not), in clear violation of the Land Reform Act 2003. Also, as with Rough Castle, the signage is poor to non existant.

Tourist chiefs should be promoting the Antonine Wall via the fully reopened Canal route, which follows the Wall closely. Furthermore, I would recommend a modern reconstructed section of the wall or gatehouse, just as they have created at Hadrian's Wall, so the public can see just how impressive this structure was when it was in use. This would allow people to appreciate the existing earthwork remains at Rough Castle itself. British Waterways, who run the Falkirk Wheel site should be consulted about this as any increase in visitor numbers would benefit them greatly and their site would be an ideal location for any proposed reconstruction.

In sum, we need active promotion of this monument; an award alone will not keep the barbed wire from the fences.
5

Buttress,

09/07/2008 10:26:06
Mountgrange's ghastly Caltongate and that UNESCO visit to Edinburgh:

www.eh8.org.uk


and the frequently updated blog with all the latest news:

http://www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/

6

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 09/07/2008 12:15:01
The Antonine Wall, which I have walked myself (e.g. see the section beside the Falkirk Wheel), is one of Scotland's major archaeological remains, and ought to be conserved. But let's be realistic - it was manned for no more than about 20 years continuously, and I doubt if it was for more than 40 years in total. It was always an outpost in an unconquered land.

The real frontier of the Roman empire for centuries was Hadrian's Wall, because it was built on the geographical line where opposing forces have balanced out down through the ages. It is no different today, when the forces are social and economic.

The Roman province of Britannia (Britain) ended at Hadrian's Wall; north of that was Caledonia. It was during the 1540s, in the course of Henry VIII's "rough wooing" of Scotland, that the expression Great Britain was coined as a political means of subsuming Caledonia and in effect pushing Hadrian's Wall up to the Pentland Firth.

The Roman remains in Scotland are all military in nature, with little in the way of civilian settlements, which indicates that Caledonia was never a regular part of the Roman Empire.

7

Douglas Eckhart,

Edinburgh 09/07/2008 15:55:16
Nobody's denying your main points James but the fact remains that the Wall is still a major monument and symbol of the Romans' involvement in Scotland: Of course, Scotland was considered a military frontier and was not Romanised any any significant way, however the Roman presense did serve to unite the northern tribes so you can still view the presense of the Romans as a major cause of the growing unification of the northern kingdom(s).

The Roman involvement in Scotland is greater and longer in duration than people realise however.

The first incursion and occupation was under Agricola in the First Century AD and this actually formed the first ever frontier system in Scotland at the Gask Ridge. This was a road and watchtower-fort system that ran all the way to the fort at Bertha (Perth). Archeological evidence now suggests that the Gask Ridge frontier was occupied for longer than Agricola alone and may be up to 15 years in duration, being finally abandoned in 88AD.

The Romans were back in AD140 and the Antonine Wall was constructed from 142 to 144 and occupied somewhere up to the mid 160s, 21 years or there-abouts - one soldier's entire military career.

Many people don't realise that when the Wall was built, the Gask Ridge forts up to Perth (including Ardoch) were also reactivated as part of the Antonine frontier system. So Roman occupation for the duration of the Wall actually ran as far north as Perth.

Then in 208AD, Septimus Severus campaigned in Scotland and began consruction of a huge legionary fortess at Carpow on the Tay, but after his death in 212 the troops were drawn back and this was not followed up.

In the 4th century, Constantius and his son Constantine appear to have campaigned in Caledonia again.
By this time however, the Romans had changed their policy and now relied on friendly tribal kingdoms in the Lowlands to act as a buffer zone and, with a few exceptions, this policy proved to be a good one.

As you can see, There is much m
8

Douglas Eckhart,

Edinburgh 09/07/2008 15:55:55
(continued)

much more Roman involvement in Scotland than people realise and the lowland tribes especially were effectively client states from the 3rd century onwards, if not earlier.
9

Pilrig.,

Livingston 09/07/2008 18:23:33
4 - report the landowners to the local authorities, they are breaching the Land Reform Act of 2003.
10

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 09/07/2008 22:18:30
Thanks for the expert summary, Douglas. I am not a specialist in this field, but as it happens I was at Carnuntum at the weekend, where the legionaries faced the Germanic tribes across the wide and swift-flowing Danube frontier. What is called "experimental archaeology" is turning up quite a lot of new findings there, and the latest satellite technology, as used in Syria, is even more effective than aerial surveys. The Ardoch fort looks very promising to me, and a full-scale excavation there might reveal even more information on the Romans in Scotland than the Antonine Wall itself.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.