Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Seize the chance to celebrate an Enlightenment giant

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 March 2008
The old maxim about the prophet who goes without honour in his own land would seem to apply to Adam Smith, author of The Wealth of Nations, one of the most influential books ever written. It almost beggars belief that Edinburgh council has instructed the sale of his former home, Panmure House, to the highest bidder, for a paltry few hundred thousand pounds, when it should be sparing no effort to ensure the building is kept in the public realm (your report and Letters, 18 March).
Smith, simplistically, is often viewed as the inventor of modern capitalism. In reality, he was a profound humanitarian thinker, a fervent opponent of slavery, a champion of American liberty, a critic of monopolies, a proponent of public education an
d an author of genius with an international reputation during and beyond his lifetime.

Panmure House is one of the Canongate's few remaining 17th-century mansions, and its association with Smith provides Scotland with a stunning opportunity to celebrate an Enlightenment giant who helped to create our modern world. He appreciated the virtues, as well as the limitations, of the liberal-capitalist system, and his views on the present state of the global economy would be instructive.

The building should be in the ownership of an academic institution or museum trust, restored and used as an international study centre. A public appeal for funding would attract support from both sides of the Atlantic. It should be launched without delay.

The Scottish Government played its part in saving Dumfries House. It could take a leading role in any campaign to redeem this beautiful building in the heart of the world heritage site.

DAVID J BLACK
Moray Place
Edinburgh





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 March 2008 8:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

StuartAD,

West Lothian 21/03/2008 08:51:12
The country simply cannot afford to own all the houses that were previously owned by famous people. The tax payer is the one who pays, not as you state Edinburgh Council.
2

Spoot,

Third rock pool on the left 21/03/2008 09:09:38
At the same time, could something be done to dissociate the name of Adam Smith from certain right-thinking pressure groups?
3

Man of Reason,

21/03/2008 11:22:21
#3 I agree - it's just a house. No need to keep it in public ownership unless we have a worthwhile use for it.
4

Confused,

edinburgh 21/03/2008 12:48:48
What would Adam Smith advise? Sell to the highest bidder or subsidise from the public purse?
5

Neil,

Glasgow 21/03/2008 13:04:22
He would probably prefer having it bought out of public subscription or by some institution rather than by government. The showman PT Barnum bought Shakespeare's home, wishing to rebuild it in America but a public outcry led to it being kept in Stratford. I think Edinburgh would be much the loser if this building is not used in an appropriate way & it is quite clear that our government does not wish it well.

I would like to see somebody like either a major bank or the Carnegie Trust buying it.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.