Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scotland leads on tolerance – will the Church of England follow?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 August 2008
THE VERY REV KELVIN HOLDSWORTH Provost of St Mary's Cathedral, Glasgow
THE bishops of the Anglican Communion are all gathered at Canterbury this weekend. It is the last weekend of the Lambeth Conference, the once-a-decade jamboree for bishops hosted by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Well, all the duly consecrated bish
ops of the Communion are there except one: the Rt Rev Gene Robinson has been in Canterbury, but with no status in the conference. He was frozen out of the official programme by the Archbishop of Canterbury – presumably his presence was too much to stomach for some potential participants. In the end, they did not turn up anyway.

Gene Robinson was refused a place at Anglicanism's high table because he is the only bishop to live openly with a gay partner. The rest of the gay bishops of the communion presumably keep the details of their relationships firmly under their mitres.

The Anglican Communion was really started, if you believe any Scottish Episcopalian, by the Scottish Episcopal Church. It consecrated a bishop for Connecticut when the Church of England would not dirty its hands dealing with the Colonies. Yet the Communion remains a strangely English place. No-one really gets excommunicated from the Anglican Communion for being naughty or indeed for being gay. You just don't get an invitation to sup with the Archbishop of Canterbury at the Lambeth Conference; no garden party with the Queen.

Bishop Robinson has also been refused permission by the Archbishop to celebrate the Eucharist while he is in England. However, the Archbishop of Canterbury has no jurisdiction here in Scotland. When it became apparent Bishop Robinson was inhibited from celebrating communion in England, it was inevitable he would be invited by someone to do so in Scotland. That someone was me. Tomorrow, Bishop Robinson will celebrate communion and preach in St Mary's Cathedral, Glasgow.

I invited Bishop Robinson to spread good news. Not just the Good News of the Gospel, which inspires all preachers, but the good news that churches are changing. At one time, gay people were expected to pretend they were not doing anything with anyone in order to be acceptable on Sunday. Those days are gone, at least for some of us.

They are certainly gone in the Scottish Episcopal Church, which has many serving gay clergy and in whose churches clergy may offer, if they so choose, prayers of blessing for gay couples.

The character of the Scottish Episcopal Church is more pragmatic than the Church of England. No-one seriously believes there are no gay clergy in the Church of England; their presence has been the subject of snide innuendo for decades. However, their presence has also been witness to the kind of faith often prepared to go places others find most difficult.

A couple of Lambeth conferences ago, the church made a compromise over polygamy that is worth re-examining. It was decided where the church had a mission to local polygamous cultures, if a family were converted to Anglican Christianity, then it would be better to keep it intact than to dump all but one of the women in a culture where women had no power and little value. It was a liberal compromise to ensure women did not suffer as the news of the gospel spread. It meant different standards of behaviour were being worked out in different cultures.

But now many from those cultures are turning the tables on us in the West and demanding we take our cue on morality from their local interpretation.

At such a time as this, I'm proud to invite Bishop Gene Robinson to share bread and wine and preach Good News. He is a symbol of positive change. He represents the fact churches can once again be worth belonging to, preach about a God worth believing in and contribute to a world worth living in.





The full article contains 657 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 August 2008 10:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Boy Wonder,

02/08/2008 05:44:03
The truly religious man does not embrace a religion; and he who embraces one has no religion.

Kahlil Gibran
2

McGinty,

02/08/2008 12:11:02
'Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.'

James
3

Jardine,

02/08/2008 15:06:08
Talk about "holier than thou" !
4

saneatheist,

Bixter 02/08/2008 18:04:48
I expect there will be a good turnout on Sunday, if only for the novelty value of a gay Archbishop.
5

Beth Boyle,

NY 02/08/2008 22:57:39
Sorry someone who leaves their wife and kids to go with another man does not belong in the Church let alone as a Bishop.
6

Hugh V McLachlan,

Elderslie 03/08/2008 00:10:58
5 Beth Boyle,

'Sorry someone who leaves their wife and kids to go with another man does not belong in the Church let alone as a Bishop.'

Is it worse to leave your wife and kids to go with another man than to leave your wife and kids for another women? Is it worse to leave your wife and kids to go with someone else than to be on your own?

Is it always wrong to leave your wife and kids (as long as you continue to support the latter)?

A church that has no room for the divorced and no room for sinners is not one that I would want to join.

This is an excellent, refreshing article.
7

Hugh V McLachlan,

Elderslie 03/08/2008 09:09:46
I remember being told in Sunday school that Moses went into the backside of the desert.
8

Beth Boyle,

NY 03/08/2008 18:32:21
No Hugh its just bad to leave you wife and kids for any reason.
9

Beth Boyle,

NY 03/08/2008 19:03:47
#6, All churches except that we are all sinners but they expect the sinner to acknowledge they have sinned and try to do better. Forgiveness is the most profound part of Christ's Church. Read- John 8:1-11 . It is truly beautiful. Love is not about ignoring peoples sins its about looking past them and loving that person despite their sins. But to be redeemed one must acknowledge they are a sinner and turn away from sin. We all make mistakes and backslide but through Christ there is always hope. On this Sabbath I wish you peace.
10

Chris Nel,

Ripon, N.Yorkshire 05/08/2008 15:38:46
After talking about issues of homosexuality and other issues of his generation the apostle Paul spoke of those who "not only practiced such things, but gave approval to others who practiced them". The word "practice" is very significant. Rev Holdsworth, sadly, seems to fall brazenly into the latter category and dismisses those who think otherwise with contempt. I grieve for Scotland if such men are at the helm of the Church.
11

Derek Williams,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 02:47:54
#10 there is no sexually explicit referral anywhere in the Bible to homosexual coition. Some English translations of the original Hebrew and Greek texts have assumed homosexual practice by reading between the lines, however the lines to which you refer are open to interpretation as to whether it is referring to a committed, loving, consensual same gender relationship, or promiscuous sex of any kind. I think it is highly doubtful that Paul is referring to the former, as homosexuality as a term was not even coined until the nineteenth century, and the nature of his writing does not connote commitment or monogamy by the alleged participants, if indeed they are homosexuals, and indeed they are as you allege engaging in homosexual acts, and if indeed these are within the framework of a loving relationship. Too many ifs by far for me, and I think it is worth looking at the fact the Paul's hero, Jesus Christ had plenty of opportunities to berate homosexuals and homosexuality, but signally failed to utter a single syllable on this undoubtedly highly contentious topic. It is worth checking out the website "would Jesus discriminate?" and the Metropolitan Community Christian Church for different takes on the morality or otherwise of homosexuals and their contribution to society at large.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.