Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

No to fluoridation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 February 2008
I understand that Margie Taylor, Scotland's chief dental officer, believes that adding fluoride to the water supply would be "beneficial and effective" in improving the country's poor oral health record. This follows a similar suggestion last week by Alan Johnson, the UK Health Secretary, who wants to add the chemical to the water supply in England. This suggests that neither of them has done much research on the subject.
The largest study ever conducted on fluoridation and oral health included more than 39,000 children in 84 locations throughout the United States. The results showed there was no difference in tooth decay rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated
communities.

A report in last month's issue of Scientific American magazine mentioned a 16-year study which tracked 700 children for symptoms of fluorosis, which causes discolouration of teeth and damage to major organs. It showed that fluorosis was 50 per cent more likely among children who lived in fluoridated areas compared with children who didn't drink fluoridated water.

Tooth decay trends tracked by the World Health Organisation from 1970 to 2002 show that the incidence of decayed, missing, or filled teeth has declined in each of the 32 years in the US, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Portugal, Iceland and Greece. Of these countries, only the US adds fluoride to the public water supply.

IAN GRANT CUMMING, Lilliesleaf, Melrose, Roxburghshire







The full article contains 241 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 February 2008 10:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

EWB,

UK 16/02/2008 07:26:11
Fluoridation is another Government quick-fix solution to the problem of insufficient NHS dentists in the system. Additionally, it is an attempt to pander to those who cannot take any responsibility for cleaning their teeth or forgo their consumption of sweets and sugar-packed soft drinks.

If, and this is a big if, fluoridation is of any benefit, then it is only beneficial when the teeth are developing. However, for the sake of teeth growing over a few years, the entire population has to ingest flouridated water for its lifetime - and the above report highlights the detrimental, long-term effects of consuming such water.

A UNESCO report earlier this century came to the conclusion that the advantages of fluoridation had been disproven and it is significant that many EU states have abandoned fluoridation.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.