Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


New head of city development

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 April 2008
THE appointment of Dave Anderson as Edinburgh's new head of city development looks set to herald a different approach to building prosperity and already the signs are that he is very much his own man who is unlikely to hang about waiting for marching orders from a group of ruling councillors who have yet to display any real sense of vision or direction.

For some councillors this might come as a shock, but in the current climate the city badly needs someone to take hold of the reins and a person with a focus on developing the city's prosperity is exactly what's needed. If the councillors can't fil
l that role then it is up to the officers to take the lead and at least the elected members can scrutinise what senior officers like Mr Anderson propose. Whatever happens, the current vacuum cannot go on.

In a recent newspaper article, Mr Anderson wrote: "Addressing the issues and opportunities facing us will call for strong civic leadership." But that seemingly obvious statement may well have raised eyebrows amongst his political masters, for it is not difficult to interpret that as inferring that he recognises that such leadership is presently absent.

But in SNP Councillor Tom Buchanan, the economic development leader, he may have a natural ally anyway, someone who has already impressed city business leaders with his understanding of the issues facing the city.

And if Mr Anderson can provide the direction behind the scenes and the politicians argue the case publicly, then everyone will be a winner.

From where the real impetus comes does not matter as long as it exists. He has already demonstrated strong views on a variety of subjects and if they can be taken up by the administration then so much the better.

In particular his view that the A8 corridor is ripe for development will put him at odds with the conservation lobby and potentially into conflict with local representatives, but it is good that a senior council representative has come out so firmly on this side of a key issue. With the tram link to the airport going through what is largely open space between the new Gogar depot and the airport, it is important to develop in that area – not just because it will be where people and businesses will want to be, but because more passengers will further improve the viability of the tram system.

He is off to a good start and is on target with his vision for the future. Let's hope he gets the back-up to make it a reality.





Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 05 April 2008 10:52 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Buttress,

05/04/2008 15:15:19
Sorry? This man is employed by the council - they tell him what to do, surely? Otherwise I suspect his days getting a salary from them may be numbered.

More cooncil sycophancy from this paper then.

What new approach? And who inferred leadership was currently absent from his writing? Only the politically biased EEN I suspect.

I thought his witterings in the press were simply off the top of his head, a man without much vision apart from more of the same - more hotels and financial sector - and he might like to appreciate that tourists come to see history and heritage, not more hotels. No mention of the fact a chunk of the city is a World Heritage Site - does he know, or care?

He also bizarrely said that he felt the historic ridge and furrow roof of the Grade A Listed Waverley Station spoilt views of the castle - and wanted to see a building on top, or grass.

Well it's a top lit station, Mr Anderson, hence the glass roof, and silly plans for grass mooted before - and thrown out.

Learn to appreciate that there are more historic buildings in Edinburgh than just the castle, and that spoiling an important bistoric station won't be a simple matter to do. Network Rail has just spent £150 million of upgrading and repairing.

So far, not a good start.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.