Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Local income tax: 'The issue will dominate the by-election'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 September 2008
SUGGESTIONS that both the Liberal Democrats and the Greens are edging closer to supporting the minority SNP Government over the introduction of local income tax will send shivers down the spine of middle Scotland and the business community.
Should it become clear that there is a political consensus for LIT the issue will pose a headache for the Calman Commission, which is currently looking into the future of devolution. The cross-party group was given further food for thought last week
with Gordon Brown all but agreeing in a keynote speech that he accepts tax-raising powers for Scotland are almost inevitable.

Should Calman, like the Steel Commission, come out on favour of greater, or even total fiscal autonomy for Scotland, the potential for the SNP to drive more wedges between Holyrood and Westminster will increase greatly.

Were Holyrood ever to win full tax-raising powers, in reality it would put the country a hair's breadth away from virtual independence. And a YouGov poll published yesterday, which showed that many more Scots would vote for independence if the Tories win power in Westminster, illustrates just how close this is to becoming to reality.

The announcement last week by the SNP that it is to push ahead with a local income tax Bill may be timely for them. It is an issue that will dominate the Glenrothes by-election hustings and give the party the opportunity to press home its case in a largely working-class constituency by telling voters the bulk of them will be better off under LIT than council tax. It is an argument that might not hold good in other more affluent areas like Edinburgh but it is tailor-made for Glenrothes.

The principle of a tax levied on the ability to pay is almost impossible to counter, and in opposing it Labour will be going into its traditional industrial heartland arguing against a tax which even its critics accept will see the least well-off paying less. At this time that seems suicidal.

Perhaps what should happen is an extension of the principle of fiscal autonomy and responsibility. If it is right that the Scottish Parliament should raise what it spends, then shouldn't the same apply to local authorities? Given that the cash would come out of wage packets, would it not be appropriate for the amount taken for councils to be clearly explained on payslips, just as happens just now with National Insurance?

Administering and collecting it would be an enormous headache, but if councils were responsible for setting their own tax and every wage-earner could see precisely how much money was being taken to pay for local services, that would improve local accountability... and the pressure on councillors.





The full article contains 465 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 September 2008 9:17 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

familymanwith2jobsandawifeworkingfulltime,

09/09/2008 13:07:28
"The principle of a tax levied on the ability to pay is almost impossible to counter, and in opposing it Labour will be going into its traditional industrial heartland arguing against a tax which even its critics accept will see the least well-off paying less. At this time that seems suicidal."

Even the low earners earnings vary - it depends how hard people work. Why should the hard working ones with two jobs or more, pay more for services than someone with one job?? - or worse no job. Should the person with two jobs pay more for a loaf of bread also? Wouldn't make for a vibrant economy if the answer was YES - but then again nothing would surprise me regarding these SNP jokers


2

Miss H,

09/09/2008 13:33:30
Have to laugh at the idea of middle Scotland being horrfied by a combination of the SNP, Greens and lib Dems.

Who do you think votes Lib Dem and Green?

It ain't the working classes.
3

Linda,

Edinburgh 09/09/2008 14:04:46
Anyone who has lived in Edinburgh for more than a couple years woulds not write " It is an argument that might not hold good in other more affluent areas like Edinburgh but it is tailor-made for Glenrothes"

The majority of voters in Edinburgh would be better off under LIT.
4

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 09/09/2008 14:40:00
#3 Linda,

If the majority of people in Edinburgh would be better of then that means that a minority of people in Edinburgh are subsidising the majority. Now is that fair. Do the minority produce more waste, do they use the libraries more, do they get the streets they live in swept more frequently. The LIT is a populist idea because it gives the impression that people who earn more will pay more well they wont they will leave the country and head south. What about business do you think they will remain in Scotland when they can get better tax rates down south. The LIT will not cover the money raised by council tax that is obvious so what services are going to be cut. There will be no council tax rebate from Westminster (you cant get a rebate on a tax you dont pay) The SNP saying that money made in savings from present budget will help cover the shortfall so again I ask what services are going to be cut.
5

First Minister,

Markinch 09/09/2008 18:21:29
I posted regarding this LIT Versus Council Tax in the Glenrothes election well over a week ago, so you should be thanking me Scotsman for alerting you to this battle, And will North british publications change their attacks on the LIT after the SNP win Glenrothes? I dont think so some how!
6

,

10/09/2008 01:36:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Truth Teller www.oilofscotland.org,

Glasgow 10/09/2008 10:07:11
Before you all start moaning, have any of you worked out how much 3p in the pound or a 3% local income tax works out at.

If this is more than your current council tax - then you can moan if it is not, well!

Family Salary = £10,000 = £300
Family Salary = £15,000 = £450
Family Salary = £20,000 = £600
Family Salary = £30,000 = £900
Family Salary = £40,000 = £1200
Family Salary = £50,000 = £1500

Remember this tax will take 85,000 desperate Scot's out of poverty. However independence and full control of the 32 million a day oil revenue that we currently send to Westminster will make a big difference to all Scot's. For more details fact figures and shocking secrets visit http://www.oilofscotland.org

Family Salary = £60,000 = £1800
Family Salary = £70,000 = £2100
Family Salary = £80,000 = £2400
Family Salary = £90,000 = £2700
Family Salary = £100,000 = £3000

For more information visit http://www.glenrothesbyelection.co.uk

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.