Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Jim Hume: Forest leasing risks losing tourism and not improving climate

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 December 2008
SCOTTISH tourism and jobs are being put at risk by the latest SNP money- making wheeze. The Scottish Government is consulting on plans to lease out vast tracts of our nationally-owned commercial forests.
The plans have been buried deep in the Scottish Government's Climate Change Bill, currently being scrutinised by MSPs in the Scottish Parliament. Ministers propose to offer leases to any private company for up to 75 years. The SNP, with the active ba
cking of the Tories, is essentially looking to privatise large swathes of Scotland.

Leading environmental group Friends of the Earth, has raised concerns that this proposal blithely assumes that private companies can make Scotland's forests more profitable than the Forestry Commission. There is also a concern that any potential lessees may not be bound UK Woodland Assurance Standards.

It is also being suggested that these companies would be eligible for Scottish Rural Development Programme grants, currently not available to the Forestry Commission. This would reduce the already limited money available for environmental land management elsewhere, and would amount to direct state subsidy for private profit.

Scotland's forests are important national assets. They are not just areas of natural beauty, but hubs for rural and tourist enterprise. The Forestry Commission will have timber supply contracts with many local industries based around the woodland. There would be no guarantee that a private investor would continue these contracts.

The Environment Minister claims that this proposal is part of the Scottish Government's package of measures to tackle climate change. Yet, privatising the forests could jeopardise the timber contract for one of Scotland's largest biomass centres, the E.ON generator in Lockerbie. SNP claims about their support for alternative green energy are fundamentally undermined by this attempt to seriously disrupt the supply chain for biomass.

The forests also provide a base for many leisure and tourism attractions. Perhaps most notable has been the rise of Forestry Commission based and maintained mountain bike trails and centres.

The trail centres are used by walkers, visitors and bikers alike. Scotland has already hosted a series of world and national championships at forestry based mountain bike trails. The Dalbeattie 7stanestrack in the south of Scotland has been selected to host the World Mountain Biking Conference on sustainability in May next year.

This is the first time that this event has been held outside Canada. It is estimated that more than 400 delegates worldwide will attend, bringing more than £1.3 million to the local economy. What chance will this industry have to expand if the forests go into private hands?

The Government has been very cagey about who it will allow to lease our forests. We need real details about any potential bidders. Rumours are flying around about wealthy Russian oligarchs and conglomerations snapping up this offer. Given that these plans are set to have a real impact on communities and individuals across Scotland, we need to know who the Government is prepared to sell out to.

Tory support for the SNP proposal is not surprising given their far from illustrious track record in selling the family silver. However, as the Tories have found to everyone's cost, this strategy is not always in the long term interests of the country. SNP Ministers must learn from history and drop this plan before it's too late.

• Jim Hume MSP is the Liberal Democrats' environmental spokesman.





The full article contains 571 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 December 2008 10:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

yockel,

04/12/2008 05:54:54
The forests are far from being a hub of tourism and are not exactly good for wildlife either.
Even so, lunatic idea.
Sell the forests to WallMart or whoever and the profit is exported.
Whether it is more or less than the FC would have made is irrelevant and probably an accountancy conjuring trick anyway but what ever it might be, it is all gone.
This approach is one of the reasons we are in the mess we are in. We have exported all our means of producing wealth and are now struggling to find cash to buy what we used to produce.

About all we are left with is the bare land and its produce.

Does the SNP really intend to strip us of that too?

Perhaps this is just another Labour policy that has snuck through because SNP ministers are too lazy to scrutinse the output of their departments.
2

Number 6,

Germany 04/12/2008 09:27:16
#1 Sell? Sell. I believe the plan is to lease parts of the forest. Try reading the facts, not what your unionista handlers have told you to write. Your post is so ful of doom and gloom, i'm surprised you've not topped yourself.

Stop judging everything by your unionista hero's standards. This is a Scottish centric goverment who
do things to try and improve the lot of the Scottish people.

Why is it that people like you spend every breathing minute protesting about every attempt by the SNP to put Scotland back on it's own two feet.?

Now that Hume (Lib-Dems) has said his piece, will this paper invite the Enviromental spokesman for the SNP to put their case ?.
3

Selgovae,

04/12/2008 09:42:00
"We need real details about any potential bidders."

We need real details about more than that. Yet Jim Hume is certain that the "plan" should be dropped now. I guess it's comforting to be so certain.
4

Number 6,

Germany 04/12/2008 09:51:19
#3 Exactly, they try to stop every SNP led project in it's tracks, regardless of how much the policy may benefit Scotland.

They would rather nothing succeeded than see the SNP get any credit, hence the garbage about the land being "Sold".
5

Goggsie #,

Fife 05/12/2008 00:19:05
Perhaps if the SNP had an effective press officer their position on this issue and others would be available. It's just another example of the SNP's lack of professionalism. I am a nationalist, but sick to the back teeth of the low quality of SNP politicians and their leadership. We need politicians with integrity and vision, instead of self centred mediocrity. The blame for this can be put squarely at the foot of the voting population; who in the main, don't care who gets in as long as they can watch football.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.