Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Enough listening – time for fresh ideas to move forward



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 August 2008
ANDY KERR says he bows to no-one in loving his country – as he lays down his vision for the future of Scottish Labour
SCOTTISH Labour is at a crossroads. The seismic plates of Scottish politics have shifted over the last few years and the Labour Party – my party – must decide whether it is going to make a similar shift or fall between the cracks.

It has happened
before. The Scottish Tories were once a powerful force in Scottish politics, but they failed to change as Scotland changed and, as a result, they became a political irrelevance.

I believe that it is not just the leadership of Scottish Labour that is at stake in this contest, it is the future survival of the party. We must use the leadership campaign to renew and energise the party.

The last few months have been very difficult for everyone in the Labour family, but I've had enough of the mantra that we are listening to people's problems. It's been repeated all too often after the London mayoral elections, Crewe and Nantwich, and even more depressingly, after Glasgow East. People are fed up hearing that we're listening to them.

What they want from us are the ideas to take them and the country forward.

Too much has been said, also, about the need for the Labour Party to reconnect with our supporters and, more generally, with voters. If we come up with the best ideas, the best policies to take Scotland forward, we will reconnect with voters. That's why this election must be a battle of ideas.

Make no mistake, I want to win this contest; but win, lose or draw, what we need most over the next few weeks is the emergence of new ideas, a genuine debate on their merits and, at the end of the process, a clear direction for the future of Scottish Labour.

I kicked off my campaign with a new policy to tackle the lack of affordable childcare in Scotland, a major headache for many families.

My proposal is to increase the number of hours' free childcare so that each child receives up to 800 hours a year, almost double the current provision, and extend the scheme to two-year-olds. I also want to make the system more flexible so that childcare can be taken up when it suits parents.

At a stroke, it would lift an enormous financial burden from thousands of families and, for many others, it would remove the obstacle that prevents them from returning to work or training. Yes, it costs a lot of money – £360 million on top of the money already spent by the Scottish Government on childcare – but this is one of the biggest issues facing contemporary Scotland and we require an ambitious policy to address it and deliver what families need.

I believe this is the kind of bold, innovative solution that people are crying out for and it is Scottish Labour's duty to deliver.

The nation needs politicians who will look at long-term trends, social structures and the economy and devise policies for a better future.

I want to lead a Scottish Labour Party full of people that will do just that. I want my party to come up with the policies that we will look back on in 20 years' time and say "that made a difference".

Let me give you another example. All three leadership candidates in this contest – Iain Gray, Cathy Jamieson and myself – agree that the government should levy a windfall tax on the excessive profits of energy companies, unlike Alex Salmond, who opposed the petroleum revenue tax. If you have fairness and equality at heart, it's difficult to think otherwise.

But the next question is what to do with the money raised. Again, we should look to the future. Energy prices aren't going to come down, in fact over the next decade they're going to increase to levels that make today's prices look cheap. We can use the money to help with fuel bills this winter, or we use it to help with fuel bills every winter. We must choose the latter.

We should certainly use it to invest in economical central heating and better home insulation, but also, as energy prices rise, the costs of installing micro-renewable technologies – wind turbines, solar panels and heat pumps – look more affordable and the savings these technologies can deliver look less like a futuristic pipe dream and more like economic necessity.

So we should use the money to install micro-renewable technologies to households blighted by fuel poverty.

These are just two examples of the kind of forward-looking, ambitious policies I believe Scotland is looking for and I want to deliver. There will be more over the next few weeks.

We need to move forward as a party on to braver territory and show people that we have the new ideas that will deliver substantial and lasting change for Scotland. Alex Salmond's SNP got into power at Holyrood on a phoney sales pitch that they are more Scottish and more progressive than Scottish Labour.

On the first point, let me assure the First Minister that I am every bit as Scottish as he is, and every bit as proud. I bow to no-one in my love for my country and my desire to see all Scots fulfil their potential.

I do not subscribe to the myth that proud Scots should want to break away from the rest of the UK. In fact, I take pride in being part of a nation that is confident enough to remain in a partnership with neighbours and play a full role in the political, cultural, economic and social life of the whole of the UK.

It's no good telling people that we are more progressive than Nationalists, we have to show them, in our policies and our deeds, that we are on their side. We need to impress people with our ambitions for our country and find new ways to improve their lives.

If we do that, we will be part of a bigger and better future for the party and the country.

That is my message to the Labour family and when I'm taking on Alex Salmond to be First Minister in 2011 – as I sincerely hope I will – that will be my message to Scotland.

• Andy Kerr is MSP for East Kilbride and one of three contenders for the Scottish Labour Party leadership.





The full article contains 1089 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 August 2008 7:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

ratzo,

16/08/2008 00:12:39
What a stirring speech.
2

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 16/08/2008 00:37:28
ANDY KERR: All three leadership candidates in this contest – Iain Gray, Cathy Jamieson and myself – agree that the government should levy a windfall tax on the excessive profits of energy companies, unlike Alex Salmond, who opposed the petroleum revenue tax. If you have fairness and equality at heart, it's difficult to think otherwise.


Andy, lad, have you told Gordon that you and the other puppets want a windfall tax? No? Why not, lad, can you not reach him on the phone? Is he not taking your calls? Perhaps you can call Darling or Cairns, they might pick up. It is possible?

I am glad to see you still have hope in your party. Delusion is a wonderful thing. It helps you get through the dark times.

And do please send that wee note to Alex Salmond apologizing for the blatant lie you just told. You are never going to get ahead if you cannot recognize the truth. After all you are not a Herald editor.
3

McNasty,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 01:35:45
The problem is; Andy, the people of Scotland have been listening to Nu-Labours message, and they do not like it one bit.

When Nu-Labour does listen, it is to its own ranting and raving' that they, and they alone have the infinite wisdom to run the country.

The Scottish people now realise that Labour can now be beaten, the party that can beat them is the SNP, led by Alex Salmond, and no matter what you say, Andy, the writing for Labour is on the wall.

Most voters now think; "Labour sucks."

4

ratzo,

16/08/2008 01:38:12
I see NuLab zombie Jim Murphy is to take over as scottish secretary from Des Browne. Murphy is culpable for some of the worst Orwellian Nulab-Newspeak atrocities in recent times but its his role as a fiscal entryist via 'Labour Friends of Israel' that ought to disturb Holyrood labour all the more. While Cathy and the rest are agonising about the lost left, he's one of the hard core that launched Blair's neocon takeover of the party by diluting the Unions' cash with megabucks from the likes of Lords Levy & Sainsbury - a move that also saw Labour 'lose' its traditional view on Palestine for a New American Century-type view on Israel.

Why should anyone be bothered with Andy Kerr when his minder will be along in a moment.
5

Graeme Thomson,

Glasgow 16/08/2008 02:40:47
Reconnect with what Labour actually stands for first Andy and the voters may follow.

Here's a few tips: Fighting child poverty is a good place to spend taxpayers' cash. Fighting in Iraq is not; Funneling cash into ensuring every child in Scotland can read and write is a good use of resources. Spening billions on weapons of mass destruction in Faslane is not; Using social policies to close the gap between rich and poor helps create a more cohesive society. Making the gap bigger – as New labour has done – helps create social disharmony.

Your party is just a means to an end. You have lost sight of why the party was created and what it is meant to strive for. Instead, the survival and prosperity of your party is all that matters to you.

Reconnect with some principals Andy and then stick by them. You never know, people may actually like that.


6

Hugo of Garven,

16/08/2008 07:30:14
" . . part of a nation that is confident enough to remain in a partnership with neighbours . . "

Andy Kerr seems to have a poor idea of what constitutes a partnership.

Scotland is not a partner of England and neither of us are partners with Londonopolis
7

donald,

glasgow 16/08/2008 07:53:05
Scotophobe hack finds new identity for election gaff a day elction purposes.
8

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 16/08/2008 08:55:43
So this "battle of ideas" adds up to:

1. Spend £360m (which will be funded by mumble mumble) on childcare, to encourage even more irresponsible breeding by the poor and allow parents to neglect their kids and go out and do jobs that don't exist.

2. Emptily advocate a windfall tax that the leader of the Scottish Labour group has no power to implement, and which could be being implemented right now by the Labour Prime Minister if he wanted to, which he clearly doesn't.

3. Otherwise continue in the direction that has seen the poor subsidise the rich for the last 30 years of Thatcherite/Blairite government.

Wow. Where do I sign up for this bold new vision?
9

First Minister,

Arran 16/08/2008 09:02:15
When i was young i had no sense
I voted Labour without repense
I dont know why but it makes me cry
I voted Labour but i dont know why.
I have previously voted for the Old Labour Party,
never again will i, or anyone in my entire family ( 30-
40 ) vote New Labour ever ever again. They are the
New Tories. Vamos
10

tommy M,

Scotland 16/08/2008 09:06:56
Enough listening. Time to bash on with running down the country whilst lining our own pockets!

i don't think so Labour weasels in poke.

It's time.
11

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 10:05:39
Since the untimely death of Donald Dewar, the Labour Party in Scotland has been totally bereft of outstanding individuals?

The choice for leader from the present lacklustre trio cannot instill any real confidence in Labour supporters.
12

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 10:15:23
“Let me give you another example. All three leadership candidates in this contest – Iain Gray, Cathy Jamieson and myself – agree that the government should levy a windfall tax on the excessive profits of energy companies, unlike Alex Salmond, who opposed the petroleum revenue tax. If you have fairness and equality at heart, it's difficult to think otherwise”.

Oh really?
From The Herald, 05/08/08.
Salmond backs windfall tax on energy firms

There was a "very compelling" case for a windfall tax on energy companies, Scotland's First Minister, Alex Salmond, said today.

Such a charge, which would be levied by Westminster, could be used to help protect consumers from the impact of rising energy bills, he added.

Last week Centrica, the parent company of Scottish Gas, announced a record 35% price hike for gas.
The increase comes despite half-year profits of £992 million.

The energy companies had made "windfall gains", Mr Salmond told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland.
"It seems entirely reasonable that some of that funding goes to help the consumer and help companies for that matter who are struggling with sky high energy bills," he said.

It has been reported that the Westminster Government is considering imposing such a tax, with UK Business Secretary John Hutton stating last week that ministers were "looking at" all options.

Mr Salmond said: "The case specifically for the energy companies is it has become clear that they were allocated, over-allocated, a large number of entitlements under the EU emissions scheme.
"These inflated allocations were then on-sold by the energy companies for sums which are estimated up to £9,000 million.
"So the case is that they gained substantial profits, not through any work that they did, but through the workings of that scheme.

"Therefore there is a case for taking some of these profits and using them for the public interest to protect families against the cost of rising energy bills, to help with fut
13

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 10:18:42
Post was truncated, but I’m sure the point was well made.

Who can believe a word this clown utters?
14

TWC,

Ayrshire 16/08/2008 11:37:45
I'm afraid that the Three Amigos all sound the same to me -- Labour Values -- Social Conscience -- Nursery places.
Andy needs to attract voters from outside the shrinking Labour family and a lot of us have left home.
There is no way of stopping SNP save Full Fiscal Autonomy perhaps within a Federal system.
Lib dems are now turning to this.
Labour are so stuck in the past that I fear they are doomed in Scotland.
Change or perish Andy.
15

roan dddd,

glasgow 16/08/2008 16:27:55
Why do you bother Andy you mental defective. How can you expect to be taken seriously when you have a baw sac for a chin
16

Jwil,

16/08/2008 22:59:50
"What they want from us are the ideas to take them and the country forward."

Are you confident about that Andy? The "us" word doesn't apply to the Labour party any more.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.