Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Broadcasting for Scotland



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 May 2008
Gerry Hassan makes some interesting points about broadcasting in Scotland (Opinion, 13 May). However, many of his contentions bear little semblance to reality.
Scotland is, as he notes, changing as a nation, culturally and politically. Against such a backdrop, the choices broadcasters – and print media – have to make are indeed challenging.

Where I completely disagree with him is in his contention that t
he BBC is out of touch in such a changing landscape and failing to serve audiences. If he doubts the BBC's commitment to Scotland, he need look no further than the £188 million investment made last year in the digital broadcasting centre at Pacific Quay in Glasgow.

Like every publicly funded organisation, we have to make the best use of limited available resources. We are absolutely committed to investing in high-quality programming and journalism content for UK-wide and Scotland-specific audiences that resonate and connect with them, on television, radio and, increasingly, online.

We care passionately about our audiences. That is why we make every effort to ensure that modern Scotland, in all its rich diversity, is reflected through our output. We aim to do better but we can be proud of what we already achieve.

MARK BYFORD, Deputy director general, BBC Pacific Quay, Glasgow





The full article contains 212 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 May 2008 12:10 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Alec M,

Falkirk 17/05/2008 07:24:28
Mark, it's not the building (however much it might cost) that fills the airwaves but the people who staff it. Strip sport from BBC Scotland TV and radio output and there is very little left - and what is is of generally poor quality.
2

Colin Wilson,

Aberdeen 17/05/2008 09:31:20
Re #1 : "what is is of generally poor quality"

That's right. And there's next to nothing in the UK's most neglected minority language, Scots, which exposes the claim to be making "content... for Scotland-specific audiences" as a blatant falsehood.
3

gus1940,

Edinburgh 17/05/2008 09:41:42
#1

For sport read football bl--dy football.

You can't escape from this stupid game for hooligans.
4

Upbeat,

17/05/2008 09:59:29
For three days the "news" headlines in Scotland were only Football...the second story football...the third story...football. Partly as a result of all the BBC hype subsequent stories are now all about the behaviour of some supporters while in Manchester.

The BBC management might be surprisied to know that hundreds of thousands of Scots are not interested in the antics of a group of over paid athletes dancing in the spotlight of transient fame.

The fact that so much licence money is squandered on appeasing the football lobby in Scotland is a scandal. If people seriously need to watch football on TV...then they can subscribe to football promoting satellite channels. They cannot claim that they..as football fans ...are too poor. Whole droves of them were affluent enough to travel to Manchester. Some, fuelled by drink did irrepairable damage to the reputation of their countrymen by behaving as animals in Mancheter. Was this not in part due to the hyping up by BBC coverage of this event... paid for by the TV licence payer

Be reminded Mr Byford most people in Scotland could care less about most football contests or the part of Rangers .Celtic, Motherwell or Hibernian etc. in any one of them .
5

Jwil,

17/05/2008 10:02:07
MARK BYFORD, Deputy director general, BBC Pacific Quay, Glasgow said:

"Like every publicly funded organisation, we have to make the best use of limited available resources."

So why are the BBC withholding resources from Scotland? Why the lies about programmes being made in Scotland when they are made elsewhere?. And the hype about Pacific Quay is getting a bit worn. I am sure it it is no more than exists in London, Bristol, Cardiff and Manchester except it is a considerable time shift behind their facilities. You are doing a considerable disservice to homegrown talent. Whether it is the programme makers or the actors or the presenters, not to mention the Scottish economy. Do you ever speak up for Scottish Broadcasting when you talk to the big bosses in London or do you just lie down and accept the situation? If it is the latter you should be ashamed of yourself.

The writing is on the wall for the BBC in Scotland, and it is more than likely that is why the BBC is biased against the SNP government in its reporting of political activity in Scotland. What are you going to do about that? You have also a duty to do your best for the Scottish economy.

Are you actually a Scot?
6

Rob - Honest Toun,

17/05/2008 11:37:16
"We care passionately about our audiences."

But no passionate eneuch tae speak tae us in oor ain language. Some passion!
7

Socrates,

17/05/2008 12:53:11
6# Our own language is English, which you use very well despite your smattering of Musselburgh dialect.
8

Mikey,

17/05/2008 13:20:39
#7, again, you write without thinking. Please change your nom du guerre. You're embarrassing!
9

Socrates,

17/05/2008 16:44:24
You really are a plonker!
Nothing to offer and a juvenile name to boot!
10

Colin Wilson,

Aberdeen 17/05/2008 19:45:17
Re #7 : Arguing about the name is semantic quibbling that evades the real issue. Why is Scots strictly excluded from the BBC when Anglo-Saxon varieties from e.g. the USA and Australia are perfectly welcome? Why have the UK authorities gone to such lengths to try to eradicate Scots?
11

Colin Wilson,

Aberdeen 17/05/2008 20:15:21
Again re #7 : there's very little that's specific to Musselburgh in Bob Fairnie's comment at #6. Apart from his use of "no" instead of "nae", his usage is consistent with e.g. north-eastern usage.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.