Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Book review: What they teach you at Harvard Business School

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 September 2008
BY PHILIP DELVES BROUGHTON

PENGUIN £12.99
Review by CHRIS BLACKHURST

EARLY on in Philip Delves Broughton's searingly funny account of life at Harvard Business School, the British reader and TV viewer is brought up short. The MBA students are in their first year, studying RC – Harvard co
de for required curriculum – when, as part of the course, they play "Crimson Greetings".

They're divided into separate "universes", or teams of ten students, and their task is to build and run a greetings card business. Whichever team creates the most profitable card business wins.

For anyone who has seen The Apprentice, the exercise is eerily familiar. On Sir Alan Sugar's programme they do the same. But nobody there says: "We need to do a deep dive on production to improve our metrics."

As Delves Broughton says: "I kept wondering what a young Bill Gates or Rupert Murdoch would have made of this course. Not much, I imagine." Sugar, undoubtedly, would be the same.

But then entrepreneurs of that calibre are born, not made. What the Harvard MBA is about is instilling in others what to a few comes naturally. So decision-making and risk-assessing are packaged into formulae and processes – management by numbers. There's nothing wrong with that. Every generation has its brilliant entrepreneurs and innovators, but when they leave the stage others have to pick up where they left off.

That's what an MBA does. It makes the challenge of running an organisation successfully more achievable – not in a gung-ho way, but with analysis and thought. I'd be lying if I said I've never thought of doing one myself, even at Harvard. Heavens, I seem to have met plenty of Harvard MBAs in my time and have found myself thinking how come they're sitting on that side of the desk earning a fortune when I'm not.

All credit to Delves Broughton, also a journalist (he was the Paris bureau chief of the Daily Telegraph), for having the gumption (and the cash – the fees aren't cheap) that I lack. The result is confirmation that if you want to go into business but don't have it in you automatically, an MBA is a pretty good place to start. And as the lecturers keep reminding the students and the students keep reminding each other, there is nowhere better than Harvard.

It's this last bit that gives the book its hilarious edge. Partly, it's the Brit-observing-Americans-in-their-own-backyard thing such as when he's told before he arrives: "Don't bring that guitar … Don't bring any books from literature or history classes … Don't bring your cynicism. Do bring all the diverse rest of you. We can't wait to share the experience."

And the glorious (to the eye of a cynical Briton) incident when a student drank too much at the end of a semester party, Holidazzle, urinates on a student's door and then writes to the whole school, admitting to a "regrettable property damage incident". His behaviour, he said, "had made him realise he still had work to do figuring out who exactly he was".

In the main, it's the arrogance and pomposity of the place that sees itself as the world's No 1 that provokes laughter. In one episode, the Dean berates the Wall Street Journal for having the temerity to rank Harvard 13th among business schools. His explanation is that the journal poll was among recruiters, many of whom find it hard to recruit Harvard Business School graduates. The reason? "Harvard MBAs, he said, often choose between several job offers so left many companies disappointed and complaining to newspapers."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 August 2008 8:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Thomas J,

Dunfermline 01/09/2008 07:38:29
Was the proposed Harvard Business School in Dunfermline wrong?

The people of Dunfermline have been fortunate over a long period of time in being gifted land and buildings by local benefactors. The first such gift that I am aware of, a large tract of monastic land, was gifted them by the Abbot of Dunfermline, Robert of Crail in 1322. The terms of the gift were that many acres of pasture land was gifted to the ordinary people of Dunfermline in perpetuity, to do as they wished with in return for a token annual fee—six pence or a pair of white Paris gloves!

Perhaps this well documented act of benevolence by the Abbot of Dunfermline was the ideal that inspired Andrew Carnegie, Dunfermline’s best-known son, to carry out his philanthropy in later life? One thing is certain the Abbot’s gift has all but disappeared over the years as corrupt or lazy stewards of the common good allowed it to be sold or given away. Today very little is left.

It is a matter of record that Andrew Carnegie was aware of the purloining of common good land by the landowners of his day. When Andrew Carnegie decided to gift the 70-acre Pittencrieff Park and Glen together with money to support its upkeep in perpetuity—specifically for the people’s leisure—he gave it to a dedicated Trust. Perhaps Carnegie wanted to avoid his gift to the people of Dunfermline going the same way as that of his mentor in philanthropy Robert of Crail.
Sadly it appears that the gift Carnegie described as his “most precious” is under threat as it faces development to bail out the cash-strapped Fife Council who took over the stewardship of the park when the designated stewards, the Carnegie Dunfermline & Hero Fund Trustees fell on hard times. Having failed in their bid to attract the Harvard Business School building in the Glen the Trust have not given up their commercial development ambitions.

Save Our Glen website is a website set up to take a detailed look at the stewardship of Pittencrieff Park by the Carneg
2

Thomas J,

Dunfermline 01/09/2008 07:39:59
Contd.......
Carnegie Dunfermline & Hero Fund Trustees/Fife Council, and to chronicle the threat to the people's park of Pittencrieff and if possible mobilize the people to stop this loss of green space.

If the specific terms of gifts to the people can be overturned and reversed by those entrusted with their stewardship, the long tradition of benevolent giving in Scotland will come to an end. What present-day Carnegie would gift land or precious artifacts if they know that these might be sold off to augment their profligate local council’s cash shortfall?

See website @ http://www.saveourglen.com/

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.