Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


OJ's 'murder' mystery story published in US magazine

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 January 2007
OJ SIMPSON'S "hypothetical" account of how he might have murdered his ex-wife and her friend has been revealed for the first time, telling how the former American football star was left drenched in blood following the fatal altercation - and how he may have had an accomplice.
Two months after News Corporation cancelled publication of the book If I Did It, admitting after a public outcry it had been an "ill-considered project", the US magazine Newsweek yesterday published a summary of the crucial chapter.

The book was based on a bizarre interview with Simpson by publisher Judith Regan, in which he swore his innocence yet offered a graphic version of how the murders could have unfolded had he committed them.

His allegedly speculative account of the events of 12 June, 1994 begins with the revelation that he was in a "foul mood" that day due to problems with his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson.

He drives his Ford Bronco to Ms Brown's Los Angeles flat, "parks in the alley behind her condo and dons the knit wool cap and gloves he keeps handy to ward off the chill on the golf course", Newsweek states.

"He also has a knife in the Bronco, protection against LA 'crazies'. He intends to scare her," the account adds.

After entering his ex-wife's property, Simpson encounters Ron Goldman - a friend of Ms Brown's, who says he is there to return spectacles Ms Brown's mother left at the eatery where he works.

Newsweek continues: "Simpson accuses Goldman of planning a sexual encounter with Nicole, which Goldman denies. Nicole tells Simpson to leave him alone. Goldman's fate is sealed when Kato, Nicole's Akita [a dog], emerges and gives him a friendly tail wag. 'You've been here before,' Simpson screams at Goldman.

"Simpson writes that his ex-wife came at him like a 'banshee'. She loses her balance and falls hard, her head cracking against the ground. Goldman assumes a karate stance, further angering Simpson. He dares the younger man to fight."

Simpson then turns vague as to what happens next. "Something went horribly wrong, and I know what happened, but I can't tell you exactly how,'" he states, according to Newsweek.

The magazine also reveals: "Simpson writes that when he regains control of himself, he realises he is drenched in blood and holding a bloody knife. Both Nicole and Goldman are dead. Simpson heads back to the alley but before getting into the Bronco to flee, strips down to his socks. He rolls his bloody clothes and the knife into a small pile."

It also reveals how Simpson's tale involves a second man, "a close friend he calls Charlie, [who] is with him during the killings. Charlie is an unwilling accomplice, repeatedly urging Simpson to stop what he is doing," Newsweek reveals.

Mark Miller, Newsweek's assistant managing editor, who wrote the magazine story, speculated yesterday: "Does Charlie really exist? Some people think it might be OJ's alter ego. Others think, 'How could he have done this by himself?'... Simpson does write that he gets Charlie to give away the bloody knife."

On Sunday, Simpson said he saw factual flaws while proofreading the chapter but did not correct them because he thought that would prove he did not write it. "I'm saying it's a fictional creation," he said.

Simpson, 59, was acquitted of murder in 1995, but found liable for Ms Brown and Mr Goldman's deaths by a civil jury in 1997. He was ordered to pay their families £17.1 million damages, but has paid nothing.

Publication of If I Did It was cancelled in November after it emerged that it stood to land Simpson a £1.8 million pay packet. The publication rights will soon revert to Simpson himself, raising the prospect that his victims' families could launch a new battle to seize his copyright.

"This may be the one opportunity we have to collect," Jonathan Polak, the Goldman family's lawyer, told Newsweek.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 January 2007 10:51 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: OJ Simpson
 
1

Media 1,

cape town 16/01/2007 07:27:35

What a farce!

2

50&wiser,

Dallas 16/01/2007 10:22:09

Anyone who was truly innocent wouldn't dream of going anywhere near that situation again, nor wish to exhibit such poor taste.

3

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 16/01/2007 10:27:47

Give it a rest. Love him or loathe him , the man is innocent. In the eyes of the law. End of story.

4

Jockyw,

16/01/2007 10:48:12

Money can get you off anything.
He was so guilty, all the evidence centred on OJ rage when he caught them at it & was then chased by police.
If he were not guilty then he would have pulled over immediately.

5

Yane,

Melbourne 16/01/2007 11:03:04

Swilly Tisher #3 - He was found guilty in the civil courts and moved to Florida to avoid paying millions in damages.

6

Chuckster,

16/01/2007 14:29:40

OJ has no conscience. I feel sorry for the relatives of his victims that have to endure his posing and gloating. His guilt is evident to anyone with any discernment. It's too bad that double jeopardy is in effect, because I would consider this confession worth pursuing in court.

7

wildwes,

16/01/2007 14:41:10

Remember he is a actor,he played good for this role of innocent,what a guy.Hey maybe he should move to uk .

8

Huck,

USA 16/01/2007 14:55:37

The prosecution used false testimony and, as a consequence, the jury had a reasonable doubt after hearing the case, and quite properly acquitted him. It's the way the American Justice System protects the rights of the individual against overbearing government officials. The real question is of interest is to ask why we never prosecuted the police and prosecutors for so badly botching such a simple case.

9

Crickit,

Atlanta-USA 16/01/2007 15:02:21

Simpson was guilty. The jury was black and when they were questioned after the verdict, I believe it was the foreman, said," we ain't gonna convict our brother". There were many versions of these conversations but they were all the same. Then they all wanted his autograph.

He was not convicted by a jury of his peers. His peers would have been wealthy people in his area of Los Angeles.

His kids are into drugs and etc. because he is not a good role model. He also has gone thru his football pension every month ($35,000.00) This cannot be attached to pay the money he owes the parents of Ron Goldman and Family of Nicole.

That verdict was a black day in our judicial system. I didn't mean to go on so much but, we can't stand the man and as you saw, the people wouldn't stand for the book to be sold. Newsweek is a rag. Wonder where they got the copy of the book? Wonder how much they paid him for it?

10

Crickit,

Atlanta-USA 16/01/2007 15:05:08

I forgot-all this was on the TV and the people involved loved their 10 minutes in the limelite. Pathetic isn't it?

11

Kells,

Grand Rapids - USA 16/01/2007 19:02:00

OJ really shouldn't write something that stupid then not expect people to become skeptical about him being totally innocent.

12

ThePeter,

Glasgae 16/01/2007 19:14:47

Only in America..
And Michael Jackson loves children as well
As some of my posting for other stories show, I hate communism - the regimes in Cuba North Korea etc.
But OJ and MJ give critics of America fuel...


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.