Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


OJ Simpson protests his innocence as police probe armed robbery claim

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 September 2007
US POLICE were stepping up the investigation into an alleged armed robbery at a Las Vegas casino involving OJ Simpson yesterday as the fallen sports star protested his innocence.
Simpson said he does not understand why he is the focus of police inquiries as he went to the casino hotel room to recover items of memorabilia stolen from him. He insisted despite reports, no guns were involved.

"There was no armed robbery here,
" Simpson said. "It wasn't a robbery. They said, 'Take your stuff and go'."

Meanwhile, Alfred Beardsley, one of the men in the hotel room and a long-time collector of Simpson memorabilia, gave a contradictory account, claiming there were weapons involved.

The incident at the Palace Station casino has again brought the spotlight on Simpson, who was acquitted of murdering ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman more than a decade ago. He was later found civilly liable for their deaths and ordered to pay US$33.5m (£16.7m).

On Thursday night, officers responded to a call from the hotel made by Beardsley who, according to Police Captain James Dillon, told police Simpson was involved in the robbery.

"We have [reports] from the victim there were weapons involved," Dillon said, but added that no firearms had been recovered, no charges had been filed and no one was in custody.

Police contacted Simpson, who would not give authorities the names of the "three or four" men who accompanied him into the hotel room until his lawyer was present, Dillon said.

Authorities were trying to sort out who owned the items in dispute and had some "legitimate information that part or all of the items" belong to Simpson, Dillon said.

Simpson said he and Beardsley had a friendly phone conversation on Friday and they wanted to resolve the matter. Both indicated the underlying issue was recovery of photos from Simpson's childhood.

"Nobody was roughed up," Simpson said in an interview with a news agency. "What I can't understand is these guys are in a room trying to fence stolen goods and I'm the story."

Simpson won the Heisman Trophy for American football in college and was a star running back in the NFL. Many of his sports collectibles, including his Heisman, were seized under court order and auctioned to pay some of the US$33.5 million awarded to the Goldman family and the estate of Nicole Brown Simpson.

Now a Miami resident, Simpson lives off a sizeable pension that could not be seized under the civil judgment.

Simpson said he was conducting a sting operation on Thursday to collect his belongings. "We walked into the room," Simpson said. "I'm the last one to go in and when they see me, it's all 'Oh God'."

Simpson said it was auction house owner Tom Riccio who tipped him off and arranged for him to meet with collectors trying to peddle his belongings. Beardsley, however, said Riccio found out that he was going to be involved in a private sale of the childhood photos "and got Simpson all worked up".

"I will give him those pictures back, I feel bad about it," said Beardsley, adding that he and Simpson "feel this has gotten way out of control".

Riccio, meanwhile, told the Los Angeles Times that Simpson was supposed to show up and tell the men to give the belongings back or he would call the police. Instead, Simpson showed up with about seven "intimidating-looking guys," at least one of whom had a gun, he said.

"We tried to peacefully reacquire these personal items, not for their monetary value, but for their family value. OJ wanted to be able to pass these things down to his kids," Riccio told the newspaper. "They [Simpson and his companions] took the stuff, and they left. What can I say? Things went haywire."



The full article contains 653 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 September 2007 7:17 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: OJ Simpson
 
1

,

16/09/2007 01:45:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

16/09/2007 01:56:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Conan,

Here 16/09/2007 03:10:04

Aye, #1 & #2, but that's all water under the bridge. The Democrat Party came to be at peace with the notion of supporting the slime that clings to the inside of sewer pipes and promoting them to leaders decades agao - and they cannot change.

But, on another matter - the topic in the article (although your story was utterly fascinating - well done), all I can say if that this (other) scum bag will run out of luck at some point will be confronted with his obvious guilt as a murderer.

In the meantime, in the current farce, I think he doth protest too much.

4

The Fly Fifer,

fife 16/09/2007 03:22:18

OJ knows that there is not a black jury that will ever convict him and not a single DA who will have hiom tried by a white jury .......... win win for OJ

5

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 16/09/2007 04:49:58

Well I guess if you get away with murder,you can get away with anything.

6

Boy Wonder,

16/09/2007 06:48:03

Mr OJ "I'm innocent" Simpson. Haven't we heard of him before??

7

Jim A,

16/09/2007 08:23:46

#4 The Fly Fifer, you said "and not a single DA who will have hiom tried by a white jury.

Don't see why not, the Mayor of Detroit who's Black has just been tried by an all white jury, he's now trying to play the race card but he's on a hiding to nothing as the prosecution can eliminate jurors from the jury before the trial starts until they are satisfied and have a jury they think they will like. I don't think it matters what a persons colour is when it comes to jury service, folks is folks.

8

UriahHeep,

Edinburgh 16/09/2007 10:12:52

Isn't it odd how we're allowed to comment on OJ but not on the Mc Canns?
Are the McCanns the new OJ???

9

The Universal Curmudgeon,

Vancouver Canada 16/09/2007 12:36:16

OJ Simpson? I have just two words for this story "Who" and "Cares".

10

Cynic,

Dalkeith 16/09/2007 14:15:58

He got off with a double murder so a robbery is small fry, indeed. This is another example of the police persecuting an innocent by-stander. Wonder if he was cute enough to use small gloves?

11

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 16/09/2007 14:26:55

Simpson is a liar and a murderer who got away with it. Now add "thief" to his other "qualities".

How can he get up in the morning and think that ANYONE who is intelligent or not brain-dead thinks he is a sensate human-being.

He is a waste of oxygen and an affront to all that is civil, civilised, and humane.

12

The Daleks,

17/09/2007 15:35:14

Would Simpson be so stupid as to pull a stunt like this?

There are a lot of people out there gunning for him, not least Goldman, and certain elements of the police force.

Let's not rush to judgement.

I'll wait to hear what Ian Rankin and Lord Foulkes have to say on the matter, thank you very much.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.