Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'We don't want nuclear waste dump built near our homes'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 July 2008
PEOPLE living near the Dounreay nuclear plant say they will fight plans for a waste dump close to their homes, despite the scheme winning the conditional backing of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency.
Sepa says it supports proposals for a £110 million underground low-level radioactive waste store – the first of its type in Scotland – provided seven planning conditions are imposed to protect people and the environment.

But householders in Buldoo
, Caithness, are trying to stop the construction of up to six shallow storage vaults, which they say would be outside Dounreay's licensed site and only 430 metres from the nearest house. They want a public inquiry.

The vaults would be part of the £2.9 billion decommissioning of Dounreay. Already, 38,000 cubic metres of low-level waste have been stored on the site, but storage there is nearing capacity and decommissioning will produce up to 175,000 cubic metres more. The Scottish Government has ruled out disposing of the waste elsewhere.

The site operator, Dounreay Site Restoration, applied for planning permission for the vaults in 2006 and, if approved, they could be used by 2014. The waste would be stored in drums and put inside cement-lined containers and then buried in a shallow covered pit.

A public consultation has closed and Highland Council will consider the application later this year.

Sepa says it will object unless the council imposes conditions that cover the construction and monitoring of the site as well as assessments of the impact on land contamination and on ground and surface water. It also wants the council to consider conditions to prevent the use of blasting during excavations and to control noise and vibration.

But John Webster, a retired probation officer and Buldoo resident, said: "We hope the council will remember they are supposed to be looking after the welfare of the residents and consider whether its a good idea to dump this stuff on this site."

He added: "We were not surprised by Sepa's comments but are glad that a variety of fairly strict planning conditions were suggested. These indicate that Sepa might well think it's not going to be very nice living close to this dump."

Duncan McLaren, the chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "We would support local residents in encouraging the Dounreay operators to fully consider locating the facility on the existing licensed site, before turning to a 'near-site' solution like this."

A Dounreay spokesman said the facility had to be built off the existing site because of a lack of space and the threat of coastal erosion. He said they recognised people's concerns and would try to minimise the effect the store would have on Buldoo residents.



The full article contains 462 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 9:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Dounreay , Nuclear energy
 
1

aljok.23,

the world 25/07/2008 09:26:06
cant we put it on the moon?
2

Mikey,

25/07/2008 09:54:13
If it' so safe, store it n Westminster!
3

Neil,

Glasgow 25/07/2008 11:27:33
On previous threads we have seen how "low level waste" can be as low level as Aberdeenshire granite. I regret this article gives no comparative figures without which any "news" is meaningless. Still I suspect the locals will be happy if they were to get reduced local electricity prices as has been done in France.
4

Andrah,

Embrugh 25/07/2008 12:39:38
3# Neil, you are spot on. The locals need to receive some sort of "sweeetener" for providing what is esssentially a public service, and to counter the negative perceptions. I would bet strongly that ambient radiation exposures (ie the REAL risk) are well below those that Union St shoppers receive.
The media however, will never allow the facts to get in the way of a good scare story.
5

Longdirk Maceth,

NZ 25/07/2008 22:55:04
Where is the high level waste going?

And of course this is THE main problem with nuclear power, anyone wants and needs power, but no one wants the waste near them.
But this is a massive expence for the tax payer of the UK.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/business/-BE39s-repair-bill-for.4301635.jp
6

Saoghal Beag,

25/07/2008 23:24:06
5 Longdirk, rest assured nowhere near Neil in Glasgows back yard, love his uranium as he might he doesn't want to sleep above it, mind he is happy is someone far away does.
7

Iainbroch,

Moray 02/08/2008 00:57:48
Bury the waste in Westminster or Perhaps Windsor! Then we will see how safe it is?

After all it is England that needs the Energy. Also I wonder how many of the Westminster crooks have an interest in Uranium mining concerns or other companies that might benefit from expansion of Nuclear Power - any talk about safe guarding jobs, or gaurantees on security of energy supply or price are just big fat lies from fat cats with conflicts of interest issues!

The London govt is just not to be trusted on this issue nor is the Nuclear industry which has a history of deception and cover up in relation to its activities!

Also the rank stench of hypocrisy surrounds this issue in relation to Irans nuclear programme!
8

Colin, Glasgow,

02/08/2008 16:40:54
From reading the local paper, it seems the residents’ concerns are more to do with noise nuisance and dust rather than anything to do with radiation.
9

Colin, Glasgow,

02/08/2008 17:56:56
A letter from one of the residents:
http://www.johnogroat-journal.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/5033/SEPA_giving_thought_to_plight_of_Buldoo_residents.html

As I thought, it seems they are more concerned with the fact that it is a major excavation than with the nature of the waste being deposited.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is Alex Salmond right to oppose building a new nuclear power station in Scotland?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.