Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

US nuclear weapons 'leave British soil at last' after half a century of controversy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 June 2008
PEACE campaigners last night welcomed reports that the United States has withdrawn all its nuclear weapons from Britain after more than 50 years.
They spoke out after a watchdog said Washington had removed a stockpile of 110 B-61 bombs from the RAF base at Lakenheath, Suffolk.

American nuclear weapons have been stationed in Britain since 1954.

Each B-61 has the potential to destroy an en
tire city. Their maximum yield is 340 kilotons of TNT – compared to the bomb dropped on Hiroshima which yielded 16 kilotons.

Both the Ministry of Defence and the Pentagon declined to comment yesterday, on the grounds that Nato policies prevent them from confirming or denying the whereabouts of nuclear weapons.

However, the report's author, nuclear weapons expert Hans Kristensen, of the Federation of American Scientists, said sources had confirmed that the removal had happened in the past few years.

If true, it means US nuclear bombs in Europe are now kept at just six bases, in Belgium, Germany, Holland, Italy and Turkey, with most at Incirlik air base in Turkey and Aviano in Italy.

Defence analysts as well as peace campaigners believe the removal of nuclear weapons from three bases in two Nato countries in less than a decade undercuts the argument for continuing deployment in other European countries.

They say the removal from Lakenheath could be part of a general strategic shift since the end of the Cold War, following the withdrawal of nuclear weapons from Ramstein Air Base in Germany in 2005 and Greece in 2001.

Mark Fitzpatrick, senior fellow for non-proliferation at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told The Scotsman: "On the assumption this report is true, it reflects both a realisation that the tactical nuclear weapons serve little military purpose and that the arrangements for ensuring their safe storage have been under review.

"But there is a broader political context to the United States' nuclear weapons sited in Europe. If they are withdrawing from the UK, it might lead to withdrawal from elsewhere."

CND chairwoman Kate Hudson said: "There is no official confirmation yet but obviously we are very pleased.

"We have been campaigning for over 50 years to get rid of American nuclear weapons from Britain.

"We plan to build on this momentum. I hope it represents a shift in government thinking both here and in the US. It is marvellous news and could encourage the disarmament process across the world, potentially defusing tension with Russia about missile defence."

However, observers admit to being puzzled that Washington and Nato have shrouded the withdrawal of weapons from Britain in secrecy at a time when they are arguing with Russia over weapons cuts.

Ms Hudson added: "It is a shame, because if it is a shift in policy, it's a good thing and they should be trumpeting it."

Mell Harrison, eastern regional campaigner for CND, lives under one of the Lakenheath flight-paths and has infiltrated the base during previous protests.

The activist said she had been hearing about the bomb removal for weeks.

She said: "Rumours have been flying about that this has been happening very slowly.

"There has been work happening inside the base for about that period of time. There has also been quite a lot of flight movements.

"We have had clusters of planes coming over for a couple of days at a time.

"And they had a couple of operations to practise contingency plans for what would happen if a plane carrying one of the B-61s crashed. I want to know how they moved the bombs, and if they have been flying them over our heads without us knowing."

The news also led to renewed calls for Trident to be scrapped north of the Border.

The Reverend Ian Galloway, convener of the Church of Scotland's church and society council, said: "We continue to call upon HM government to pursue a policy of full disarmament including non-renewal of Trident."

John Ainslie, co-ordinator of Scottish CND, warned that interceptor missiles could be installed at Lakenheath as part of the US missile defence system.

Veteran campaigner welcomes 'progressive move'

THE presence of nuclear weapons has made the US base at Lakenheath a target for British anti-nuclear protesters for decades.

Dr Rebecca Johnson lived at Greenham Common women's camp for five years during the 1980s.

A major player in the protest against cruise missiles being sited at RAF Greenham Common in Berkshire, which lasted throughout the 1980s and 1990s, she became the media spokeswoman for the activists who based themselves there.

Dr Johnson, who lives in Helensburgh and went on to become a senior adviser for Hans Blix, the UN's former monitor for weapons of mass destruction, is now director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

She told The Scotsman: "This reported removal of the Lakenheath nuclear weapons means the only nuclear weapon in this country now is the Trident system at Faslane, which is something to be welcomed.

"I believe this is a political decision taken by Washington because they have had to acknowledge that they do not need the nuclear weapons for security.

"I think it is a very progressive move."

She added: "We have been pushing for this since the Cold War ended; we have been calling for a new Nato security concept to reflect the different role that Nato has in the world these days.

"Nato's role now is all about peacekeeping and in that context nuclear weapons are simply an anachronism left over from the Cold War.

"The B-61s are relatively small bombs, fairly portable, and can only really be used in a military role as they are designed to be dropped from planes.

"Each of them is several times larger than the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

"It seems ironic to call them 'tactical' when each of them could devastate a whole city."

Dr Johnson added: "The UK's decision to renew Trident violates the terms of its own non-proliferation treaty commitments.

"It is absolutely absurd that the government is planning to spend billions on a weapons system that they have to guard and cannot use at a time when they are involved in two wars."

At the height of the Cold War, the United States had more than 7,000 nuclear weapons in Europe.

The first nuclear bombs arrived in Britain in September 1954.

Most were withdrawn in the early 1990s, and today the Federation of American Scientists estimates the number of American weapons at fewer than 240 in Europe as a whole.





The full article contains 1103 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2008 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Nuclear defence
 
1

Grim Reaper,

27/06/2008 05:23:26
Iran wants nukes so couldn't they just drop them off over there?
2

Itchy,

27/06/2008 06:52:07
"PEACE campaigners last night welcomed reports that the United States has withdrawn all its nuclear weapons from Britain after more than 50 years.
"

Translation: Communist sympathizers welcomed reports......
3

Boy Wonder,

27/06/2008 06:54:40
Fine. Now how many of our own do we have???
4

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 27/06/2008 07:02:58
5 Boy Wonder

3

One to protect The Queen, one to protect the heir to the throne, and one to protect Dame Shirley Bassey.
5

donald,

glasgow 27/06/2008 07:03:50
Good. Now to get rid of Labour's foreign nuclear weapons from Scotland.
6

W Smith,

Middle East 27/06/2008 07:24:10
So according to NATO-hating Salmond, 'peace' is defined by the absence of nuclear weapons.

So Rwanda, Cambodia, and Sudan have had a good doze of Salmond-style 'peace' then over the last 35 years then, eh?

IDIOT!

BTW
Most working class Fifers, like myself, didn't have a problem with RAF fighter jets from Leuchars escorting the Soviet 'BEAR' bombers out of British airspace during the Cold War.

Mind you, as a member of the radical left-wing 79 Group, Salmond the snivelling Leftie had big issues with it.

Alex Salmond's protest friend Galloway said the collapse of the Soviet Union was the "biggest catastrophe of his life". That's the same Galloway who claims to be AGAINST nuclear weapons.

So the Soviet Union didn't have nuclear weapons eh Salmond?
7

W Smith,

Middle East 27/06/2008 07:28:59
Alex Salmond has appointed the tartan jihadist Osama Saeed to look at ways of getting rid ot Trident.

To think some of the SNP voters want to lecture the rest of us, daily, on being 'patriotic'.

GIVE ME A BREAK!
8

Biker,

Ayr 27/06/2008 08:28:07
What a load of blowhards. Now the weapons have gone we can concentrate on reducing our own stockpile. Why were US weapons stockpiled on our soil anyway?
9

Saoghal Beag,

27/06/2008 08:54:19
2 Israel could do with some too.
10

Anglofile,

27/06/2008 10:07:07
#6.

DSB lives in Monaco so I don't think it would be for her. The third one would be to drop on Gordon and his cronies, just to get rid of them.

I firmly believe that if the US says that they have removed all nukes from our country, then it must be true. Yeah right!!!!!!!
11

,

27/06/2008 11:31:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

27/06/2008 12:37:02
Wonderful news!!....Bush and his bum pal Blair found the WMD then?...gawd all that fuss...all that mess in Iraq..and they were here all the time!

6..Timothy Charles...how about we economise a bit...dethrone Lizzie...hail Dame Shirley the Queen...stick a sign on her bog saying 'keep yer érse aff - property of Queen Shirley'...and then clone her?
13

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 27/06/2008 13:38:46
Horrible Cankers

Good morning, madam.

Where have you been?

But now your back infesting these threads with your wacky and wonderful postings.
14

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 27/06/2008 15:39:34
17 Royalty

Are you nuts?

The USA always comes in last when there is a war on European soil - witness The Great War and WWII.

I think Britain can exist very well indeed without loudmouth, know-it-all, money-flashing, fashion horrors such as infest London and all the major tourist sights of Great Britain.

They lower the tone of any site they enter.
15

Schot,

27/06/2008 15:43:50
Yes, without our American cousins Britain wouldn't exist as we know it. We wouldn't be sending our soldiers to occupy two foriegn lands for no real reason. We wouldn't have had to sacrifice our civil liberties in The War Against Terror.



So thank you our American cousins for curtailing our freedoms more than the Nazis ever did. Just so your obese can drive in 4x4s. Big round of applause.

"We have detected some potentially unsuitable words in your post:

Your comment has not been processed."

The offensive word was the acronymn for 'The War Against Terror', which I for one consider to be most appropriate to Bush.

16

wherthefahkowee ,

Dark side of the moon 27/06/2008 16:41:00
15 - On Sunday - The H*ns or the Inquisitors?
17

Joe Macdelta.,

27/06/2008 16:45:04
I thank the Americans, for the support they gave, in the form of equipment and arms during ww2, without which Britain would probably have lost to Adolf, they helped greatly. The nuclear weapons kept us safe for a long time, and thankfully we still have our own, we may need them yet.
Love the American tourist or not, the money they bring to this country is good for the economy, as is the industry the brought in the past few decades, they are our freinds. Even all Americans dont like George W Bush, but lets be fair here, Nobody pushes them about, they are a good hand to have.
18

Joe Macdelta.,

27/06/2008 16:45:04
I thank the Americans, for the support they gave, in the form of equipment and arms during ww2, without which Britain would probably have lost to Adolf, they helped greatly. The nuclear weapons kept us safe for a long time, and thankfully we still have our own, we may need them yet.
Love the American tourist or not, the money they bring to this country is good for the economy, as is the industry the brought in the past few decades, they are our freinds. Even all Americans dont like George W Bush, but lets be fair here, Nobody pushes them about, they are a good hand to have.
19

Schot,

27/06/2008 18:53:07
Prescott Bush, the grandad of George W., had so many dealings with the Nazis post 1941 that he was questioned as a traitor.

All the big US corporations kept subsidising the Nazis during the war - Coca Cola and IBM spring to mind as fascist traitors. Oh, and Heny Ford produced war vehicles for both sides !

Corporate america has always been indistinguishable from fascism.
20

james395,

27/06/2008 19:30:55
Let's get the facts right.

Thank's to the fall of the old Soviet Union the Americans are taking away their nuclear missiles. CND had nothing to do with the withdrawal of the nuclear missiles.
21

2dogs in D.C.,

27/06/2008 21:02:05
Hey, come on, people, we're not all bad. Tim, do we not share a dog life? Remember, WW twice was long before I was a gleam in my daddy's eye. Also, with just one vote, I do not control my government.Once again, I can just feel the love.
22

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 27/06/2008 21:30:49
Here at United Nations HQ Vienna we have one of the most interesting of all the hundreds of UN organisations - the Preparatory Commission that was set up to prepare for the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation. Even before the CTBTO has been officially established the PrepCom is setting up a network of 337 detection stations worldwide, to ensure that nobody will get off with illegal nuclear explosions on the ground, underground, underwater, in the atmosphere or in space. Even those few states, including the US and China, that have signed but not yet ratified the Treaty (CTBT) are paying their contributions and supporting the PrepCom's activities. Unusually for an international organisation, it has no financial difficulties. All the nuclear weapon states are adhering to the moratorium on test explosions.

Everybody is in favour of the CTBTO, not just because of the policing of rogue nuclear activities, in collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, also at UN Vienna, but also because of the enormous scientific and technological spin-off from the programme. One example is its ability to detect and forecast tsunamis in time to protect at least a large part of the affected populations.

if you want to know anything about nuclear weapons (except how to make them) and nuclear disarmament, then I recommend www.ctbto.org for a most enlightening read.

23

Schot,

27/06/2008 22:51:45
Dr. James,

My life is at risk due to nuclear weapons at Faslane that were meant to have been discarded by now. Can I have a prescription please ?

Can you explain why the five security members are increasing arsenals rather than diminishing them ?

Is it true that over 20 countries have become effectively nuclear powers since the ban on proliferation first became a platitude ?


24

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

27/06/2008 23:50:05
16...Salut Timothy Charles...I was on my hold on the island of Guernsey....wonderful weather... if a tad fresh...managed a couple of bracing swims in the glacial waters surrounding this beautiful island and swallowed as many oysters as I could during my small vacance...glass of champagne in a hot bath after my icy dips...smashing!....not a WMD to be seen...perfect!.....You must be off soon yourself surely or was New York (?) your annual vacance?
25

HODGY,

AUSTRALIA 28/06/2008 00:59:49
I thought it was only Hollywood who said the US won the war. Has anyone heard of Russia and China?

Maybe the A-bombs are on there way to the bases surounding Iran, they are a very dangerious country. They could be able to deliver a bomb themselves in 20 years time!
26

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/06/2008 08:38:42
25 2 dogs in D.C.

My sincerest apologies to you, sir.

Of course I have met some pefectly charming and gracious and intelligent Americans in my travels and my fathered retired to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina before he died and the people there were "Southern comfort" personified.

You and I have our dogs in common and I hope a basic sense of decency in all matters, I surmise.

You and your family have a wonderful weekend.
27

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/06/2008 08:43:11
28 Horrible Cankers

Good morning, madam.

Glad to hear that you had a sybaritic time for your vacation.

Pour mes vacances I shall be stopping over in NYC because Ihave friends and relative living in Manhattan before I leave for England and Scotland in the fall where I also have relatives and friends in London, Durham and Cornwall.

BON VOYAGE!!!
28

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 28/06/2008 17:15:26
#27. I grew up in the vicinity of what is now the Coulport nuclear warheads dump, where I still visit when I am home, so that I share your feelings. The United Nations CTBTO project is supported by 178 out of 192 member states, which shows the level of opposition to nuclear weapons that exists in the international community. Apart from the five nuclear weapon states listed in the Treaty (CTBT), Israel is thought to have usable weapons. india, Pakistan and North Korea have carried out test explosions, but that does not prove that they have actual weapons, which would be another technological step forward. The USA still has around 10,000 and Russia about 15,000 warheads, both reducing, but nobody else has more than 200.

The point about the total ban on nuclear explosions anywhere that is monitored from UN Vienna is that it practically kills the further development of these weapons. In fact, the moratorium is already being observed all over the world, even before the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty Organisation has even officially taken up its activities. The next stage, ongoing at UN Geneva, is to reduce the number of existing warheads. There is a long way to go yet, but as the CTBTO shows, we have come a large part of it already. As to Faslane, you would have to ask the UK government what it is for; in terms of military strategy it is as good as useless.

29

Schot,

28/06/2008 17:56:36
Dr. James,

You should be writing for the newspaper, you are wasted on the comments section. (No offence to the rest of you but let's be honest!)

Apart from the countries you list though I believe there are about twenty states that could produce a nuclear weapons programme in a matter of months - I'm thinking Brasil, Saudi Arabia, Japan. So even if every single nuclear weapon was disarmed tommorow we could have a new nuclear arsenal by Christmas.

That, and the reluctance of the existing powers to disarm, and the development of new nuclear weapons, including at Aldermaston, leaves me pessimistic. Feel free to cheer me up by literally enlightening me.

Out of interst does the United Nations HQ Vienna have a nuclear bunker ?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.