Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Syria bars atomic inspectors probing North Korea link



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 August 2008
SYRIA has blocked a new visit by International Atomic Energy Agency experts seeking to follow up on intelligence that Damascus built a secret nuclear programme with the help of North Korea.
Diplomats also said Washington was circulating a note among members of the IAEA board opposing a Syrian push for a seat on the 35-nation board. The board normally works by consensus and a seat held by Damascus could thus hamper any investigation into
its alleged nuclear activities.

Syria fears an extensive atomic agency investigation similar to the probe Iran has been subjected to for more than five years.

"Syria's election to the board while under investigation for secretly building an undeclared nuclear reactor not suited for peaceful purposes would make a mockery" of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, said the note.

The diplomats said the US was pushing to encourage Kazakhstan to challenge Damascus for the seat, but the Kazakhs are apparently reluctant to do so, fearing lack of support.

Syria rejected the IAEA request for a visit late last month, the diplomats said. The visit would have been a follow-up to an initial trip by IAEA inspectors in June.

"The Syrians said that a visit at this time was inopportune," a senior diplomat said.

That appeared to leave open the possibility of a later visit. But one of the other diplomats said members of the Syrian mission to the IAEA were spreading the word among other missions that further trips beyond the one in June were unlikely.

If so, that could cripple international efforts to probe US allegations that a site in a remote part of the Syrian desert, which Israel destroyed last year, was a near-finished plutonium-producing reactor built with North Korean help, and that Damascus continues to hide linked facilities.

IAEA experts returned on June 25 from a four-day visit, carrying environmental samples from the Al Kibar site hit by Israel in September. Those are now being evaluated.

They had hoped to use a follow-up visit to put questions to Syrian officials based on the intelligence available to them outlining years of extensive cooperation between the Syrians and teams of visiting North Korean nuclear officials.

North Korea exploded a nuclear device in 2006. However, it agreed to dismantle its weapons programme early last year.



The full article contains 391 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 August 2008 8:15 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Syria , North Korea
 
1

Gere,

Scotland 10/08/2008 15:36:38
America has demonstrated its hostility towards Syria often enough.

It is, therefore, not unduly surprising that Syria has become reticent to allow further inspections from an organization that America has a lot of influence over.
2

britfreee,

10/08/2008 15:53:28
#1 Gere

Why are you supporting a known terrorist state like Syria?
3

57Nomad,

california 11/08/2008 15:16:50
#1 Gere

Gere said:

"It is, therefore, not unduly surprising that Syria has become reticent to allow further inspections from an organization that America has a lot of influence over"

That is as good as explanation as any, seeing as no one but the the Syrians (and the North Koreans) know what the truth is. Another explanation is that there is some information in the areas that are being denied inspection that would reveal sensitive information as to the involvement of the North Koreans and the Syrians. That's the one I favor, but, until evidence is produced we're just guessing.

Sometimes there are circumstances where action is mandatory but there are too many variables to allow any degree of certainty. In this case one weighs the consequences of being wrong in each case. To take the Iranians word and then find out that they were lying makes the Iranians a nuclear power, at least a junior one. But if the facilities are destroyed by bombardment and it turns out they were telling the truth, then you've got some bombed labs and factories, theirs.

If the Iranians were really making a bomb they could explode it in one of our cities. That's not the kind of thing we want to encourage by looking weak and frightened.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.