Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Pill 'cuts cancer risk and prolongs life'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 March 2010
TAKING the contraceptive pill can help women live longer and reduce their risk of serious diseases, according to a major new study by Scottish researchers.


• The new findings appear to contradict previous claims that the Pill increased the risk of breast cancer and blood clots. Picture: TSPL

They found that women who had taken the Pill – even for a short time – could expect to have longer lives than those who had never used oral contraception. The research, led by the University of Aberdeen, showed those who took the Pill were less likely to die from any cause – including all types of cancer – and heart disease.

Experts said the results of the long-running study were "enormously reassuring" to women, as use of the Pill has been linked with an increased risk of breast cancer and blood clots.

The research was based on a study of more than 46,000 women over nearly 40 years. The researchers found a slightly higher risk of dying among under-45s who had stopped using the Pill five to nine years previously. But this risk diminished as women got older.

Across all women, death from any cause was 12 per cent lower among those who had used the contraceptive pill compared with those who never had.

There were "significantly lower rates" of death among users of the Pill in all cancers, circulatory disease and heart disease. The study team said further work was needed to see if the same effects were found with newer forms of the Pill.

The results come from the Royal College of GPs' oral contraception study, one of the world's largest investigations into the health effects of the Pill.

Early reports suggested an increased risk of dying, particularly among older women or smokers. But the latest study found "a significantly lower rate of death from any cause" among women who had taken the Pill. It went on: "They also had significantly lower rates of death from all cancers; large bowel/rectum, uterine body and ovarian cancer; main gynaecological cancers combined; all circulatory disease; ischaemic heart disease; and all other diseases."

The researchers said:

"Many women, especially those who used the first generation of oral contraceptives many years ago, are likely to be reassured by our results.

"However, our findings might not reflect the experience of women using oral contraceptives today, if currently available preparations have a different risk than earlier products or if differences in patterns of usage materially affect mortality risk."

Professor Philip Hannaford, from the University of Aberdeen, who led the research which was published in the British Medical Journal, said: "Our best estimate is that if you took a group of 100,000 women and they used the Pill for a year, on average you would have 52 fewer deaths in those women compared to those using other forms of contraception."

About three million women in Britain use the Pill, suggesting about 1,500 deaths a year could be prevented in the long term.

But Prof Hannaford stressed the research did not mean woman should go on the Pill simply because they thought it might improve their health, saying: "We don't know if the beneficial effects are a result of the contraceptive, or the type of women who go on the Pill. These women have their blood pressure checked, so they may go on to monitor themselves more carefully or access health services better."

Professor Richard Anderson, an honorary consultant from the University of Edinburgh, said: "The results of this study are enormously reassuring. In particular, it is very positive news that, in the longer term, women who used oral contraception had a lower rate of death from heart disease.

"As the authors point out, their findings might not reflect the experience of women using modern contraceptives … and it is important that this is followed up on."

Jo Burgin, from Marie Stopes International, said:

"Women regularly come to our centres for contraceptive advice, many of whom express concern about serious side-effects.

"A lot of their concerns are founded on complete myths; for example, there is no evidence that the contraceptive pill is not safe, or that it causes birth defects, or that long-term Pill use can affect fertility. I sincerely hope today's research results will reassure concerned women."

Judy O'Sullivan, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, said:

"This study will provide some reassurance for women who took the first generation of the oral contraceptive pill.

"However, as with all medication, the balance between the risks and benefits of the Pill will vary from one woman to another. Women who wish to reduce their risk of developing heart disease should take regular physical activity, avoid smoking, maintain a healthy weight and eat a balanced diet."

PLAGUED BY HEALTH SCARES

IT IS hailed as one of the most significant medical advances of the 20th century.

But despite its celebrated role in the women's liberation movement and in bringing greater sexual freedom, the contraceptive pill has been plagued by health scares since its introduction in 1960. At the start, there were fears of side-effects, particularly about the increased risk of blood clots from smoking and taking the Pill. But the number of women using it rose throughout the 1960s and 1970s.

The first major scare came in the early 1980s, after research found possible links between the Pill and breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes and blood clots. Some of those concerns were linked to hormone levels in the Pill, which have now been lowered.

In 1995, experts in the UK warned women should use the Pill only as a last resort because of an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis. The scare led to 23,000 extra pregnancies over the following nine months and a 9 per cent rise in UK abortions, according to the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

In 2000, the government performed a U-turn on its stance over the contraceptive, advising doctors that women could be offered any Pill as long as they were told of the relative risks of blood clots in the leg.

In recent years, the Pill has been shown to protect against cancer of the ovaries and the womb lining, and against pelvic inflammatory disease.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2010 12:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cancer research
 
1

Observant in Glasgow,

12/03/2010 00:03:52
There are pros and cons with the pill, the same as there are with other forms of contraception.

However the pros outweight the con of having an unwanted pregnancy.

Might I suggest the bleedin' obvious - women should discuss their contraceptive requirements with their GP to establsh what works best considering their own medical history.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/03/2010 00:16:47
I would be very wary to believe any of it, it even could be a ploy from the drug companies to promote a form of contraception now not so widely used, drug companies need their profit, this is one area they need for massive profits.
It has been established for many decades that man made oestrogen's cause cancer, and blood clots, also not to forget to mention mention,, the 'pill' actually can put women off sex, and can cause broken relationships
Be Wary, Very Wary, and do not believe all you are told!

3

Observant in Glasgow,

12/03/2010 00:40:48
2 Charles you demonstrate what I am talking about.

The pill might cause medical problems and loss of libido in some women. For other women it will be fine - there may be an element of trial and error in finding out what is the right form of contraception for each individual. That is what GPs are for. Women should not make their minds up based on newspaper articles and rumours. They should make their minds up after proper medical advice - which they are entitled to.
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/03/2010 00:42:33
~3.
Observant in Glasgow,

Agreed.

5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/03/2010 01:51:14
~5.
SassyC

The "long-term consequences" of taking the 'Pill' could very well be one of Breast Cancer'.

Not so good is it?

6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/03/2010 02:37:36
~7.
SassyC,

I Understand this Subject very well, as my mother died from Breast Cancer caused by oestrogen overdose,
Secondly my ex and I knew a young Mother who did not see her Baby's first Birthday, because of being given oestrogen and died from breast cancer,
I speak not to attack the 'Pill', but not for all to think the 'Pill' is a marvel, because it certainly is not.

7

Walt Nicholes,

Utah USA 12/03/2010 05:21:59
Can't we just quit making people live longer?!?!? Medical expenses cost too much already!

(I'm being sarcastic, but I think some people share this view - mostly politicians.)
8

WDYKD,

12/03/2010 07:51:43
10 Walt Nicholes


The Pill limits the number of children born.

Makes people better off, so they can afford better health care

Not that there is anything wrong with having children
9

WDYKD,

12/03/2010 07:53:39

They should ship some free condoms and the pill to India and Africa. That might help stop people living in poverty and save the world
10

WDYKD,

12/03/2010 07:57:09
2 Charles L


The 'pill' put a lot of women on to sex, by taking away the fear of unwanted pregnancy
11

yockel,

12/03/2010 10:41:59
Hmmm, stopping taking the pill increases your chance of dying for five to nine years but if you survive for 10 years things are probably OK, or did I misunderstand that bit?
12

wild wadi,

East Dunbartonshire 12/03/2010 11:05:14
Vasectomy works for me...and a long term monogamous relationship.

If you want go hoorin and humpin around then you take your chances.

It's self inflicted in my book and the NHS shouldn't have to pick up the tab.
13

John M. Slusser II,

Nantwich 12/03/2010 11:05:52
Another fine example of social engineering at its best.
14

Sibylle,

Germany 12/03/2010 12:23:51
The reported findings are in crass contradiction to numerous and vast earlier studies, especially the outcome that women of the first-generation pill profitted from it by living longer and being spared all sorts of cancer including breast cancer. About 80 % of all breast cancers are estrogen-dependent, the earlier versions of the pill were massively overdosed in estrogen. In these women estrogen is contraindicated whether as the antibaby-pill or as a remedy to ease the effects of menopause. If all these earlier findings were rubbish, then why are there so many women of my generation ("first pill generation") and younger ones with cancer of the breast? There was breast cancer before the pill, but never were there so many people affected.
Hormones like all chemical substances have positive and negative effects on the body, so balanced levels are what you want. If you add high doses to a persons natural balance of hormones, there just can't be only positive effects. I'd like to know more about the conditions of that study, what other factors did investigators consider, and who were the study sponsors?, for instance.
15

Lang Toun Lass,

12/03/2010 12:44:21
I have known older ladies who developed hormonal breast cancers, all of whom had been on the early forms of the contraceptive pill that were around in the 60s/early 70s. The earliest pills gave women very high doses of oestrogen and I have also read about women of the same generation who went on to develop major gynaecology problems. One woman I worked with could not conceive and was told it was because of the pill she had been on in her early 20s (back in the early 70s).

I could never use the combined pills and stopped taking it in 1995. One pill I was prescribed gave me a a total loss of libido for a year; another made me put on 10lbs over a period of 2 weeks. This article leaves me very sceptical. I was diagnosed with breast cancer myself in 2006 but it was hormone negative.
16

Columba doing the Rumba,

12/03/2010 13:32:33
Want to live longer?

Then take Fish or Krill Oil, Resveratrol, Vitamin D3 and Astragalus.

Telomere lengthening is what it is all about.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.