Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Landlords demand higher rent as hesitant buyers ride the credit crunch



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 May 2008
TENANTS are facing a 50% rent rise in Scotland's two biggest cities as landlords cope with rising demand for rented accommodation.
Letting agency DJ Alexander says the clampdown on mortgages is forcing potential first-time buyers to remain in rented accommodation rather than buy their own home.

Lenders are pulling mortgages and increasing the amount of deposit they require f
rom borrowers, blaming a lack of liquidity in the banking system.

Last week Alliance & Leicester became the latest lender to announce higher rates for borrowers unable to raise a large deposit.

Customers offering a 10% deposit on a fixed-rate deal will pay around 0.5% more than someone with a 25% deposit. A&L joined the UK's two biggest lenders, Halifax and Nationwide, in penalising customers with smaller lump sums to put down.

David Alexander, owner of DJ Alexander, Scotland's biggest independent rental agency, has predicted that landlords will benefit by being able to hike the rent on quality properties by 50% over the next year.

DJ Alexander recently signed a lease for a client on a two-storey property in Dean Park Crescent, Edinburgh, on which the rent has jumped from £1,000 to £1,650 a month – a rise of 65%.

"The rationing of mortgages by the banks and building societies is making life increasingly difficult for first-time buyers, which means more young professional people are staying in rented accommodation rather than moving on to owner-occupation," he said.

"Naturally, this has had an effect on market demand, and when a lease comes to an end landlords are generally in a position to raise their rental charges by a substantial proportion."

He pointed out that rising rental income is a welcome antidote for landlords who have seen capital values stall, even in normally buoyant markets such as Edinburgh's New Town and the Hillhead area of Glasgow, as house price inflation slows. DJ Alexander has other examples of higher rents being agreed. It recently let a four-bedroom flat in Edinburgh's Dundas Street for £2,000 a month, up from £1,600 a month.

A one-bed flat in Leith is generating a rental income of £650, up from £500, and a two-bedroom flat in Park Terrace has gone up to £1,350 from £1,100. Alexander is not alone in his confident outlook for the residential property market. Citylets, a Scottish rental portal, agreed the upside of the credit crunch for landlords is that increased demand from hesitant or frustrated buyers has allowed rent rises.

Its spring 2008 report revealed that rental inflation, which had been relatively modest over in recent years, had picked up pace in the past two quarters.

In Edinburgh, the average rent for a two-bedroom flat let through the portal increased by 6.3% between the first quarter of 2007 and 2008 to £676.

The latest buy-to-let index put out by specialist lender Paragon, released earlier this month, found that "buoyant demand for rented homes is placing a strain on the stock of private rented sector accommodation, creating upwards pressure on rents".





The full article contains 524 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

ccc,

11/05/2008 07:33:31
"In Edinburgh, the average rent for a two-bedroom flat let through the portal increased by 6.3% between the first quarter of 2007 and 2008 to £676"...

Two weeks ago this same paper (Group) stated that average rent for this property in Edinburgh was £800. So what is it to be ?

Oh and BTW you should probably know that DJ Alexander is currently offloading his ENTIRE investment property portfolio in Edinburgh. Now why would he be doing that if he REALLY expected a 50% rise in rents....

He is getting out before everyone else cottons on to what is happening. Pure and simple.
2

Roblpm,

Morningside 11/05/2008 10:23:55
Rosemary, could you comment on what evidence you have to back this story up? I live in a "quality" property and our rent is being increased by 5% this August, even the examples you quote in the article are nowhere near 50%. I would expect more of SoS than just being a PR agent for the vested property interests in Edinburgh. Also you do not seem to have reported that mean house prices to March in Edinburgh are already 12.5% off the peak of last July according to Land Registry figures (source myhouseprice.com).
3

danielrober,

11/05/2008 12:11:40
Rents are going up, but quality and investment is not. The increase in rents over the last ten years has been backed up with an increase in rental quality.

The recent increases reflect old fashioned sales strategy. As house prices increase, so buying becomes more expensive. 'That's okay' say's the estate agent. 'Lets increase rents, there by reducing the difference, thus increasing housing sales'.

However the only people that can afford such expensive rental prices are those who qualify for housing benefit help. Some many property companies are giving up by charging higher rents and slowly moving into becoming slum landlords.
4

MB,

Edinburgh 11/05/2008 20:36:56
I would like to know how much DJ Alexanders paid to Scotland on Sunday to place this article and I'm sure any honest reader would. The information in the article is contradictory and false. On the one hand we are told that rents are rising by 50% yet clearly at the end of the article this does not apply to the average 2-bed property which is said to be renting out for £676 per month, a rent that is in line with what I saw on the market about 2 years ago. So the 50% headline is false and misleading.

Please try to raise the standards of journalism at your newspaper: allowing businesses to pay to place misleading information in your newspaper is not good journalism. It is depressing to see this kind of false information being publicised to shore up one individual's sell-off of property before an impending crash that everyone knows is on the way.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is it a good idea for builders to offer incentives to first-time buyers?
Yes, it gives them the chance to get on the property ladder.
It helps, but they’ll struggle to get a decent mortgage rate.
No, first-time buyers should wait for the crisis to pass.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.