Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Drivers ignore new mobile penalties

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 February 2007
SCOTTISH motorists continued to flout the ban against driving while using a mobile phone yesterday, despite the introduction of harsh new penalties.
Police forces across Scotland launched a crackdown to coincide with the introduction of new punishments which doubled fines to £60 and put three penalty points on a convicted driver's licence. But despite the warnings, The Scotsman observed drivers flouting the ban, three of them in little more than 15 minutes in Edinburgh city centre.

Road-safety groups described the violations as "appalling".

According to the RAC Foundation, half a million motorists break the mobile-phone law every day, unaware of the danger they pose. Experts say the habit can be as dangerous as drink-driving.

But yesterday's evidence showed that a hard core of drivers would take more convincing to change their behaviour.

The first offender was spotted cruising his silver Land Rover on to the west end of Princes Street from South Charlotte Street at 12:09pm, taking the tricky turn with one hand. At 12:25, the driver of a black Honda 4x4 followed the same route, and even dropped both hands off the wheel to fiddle with the radio.

At 12:27, a woman in a Mercedes CLX turned from Princes Street on to South Charlotte Street, seemingly oblivious to the stricter enforcement laws. And later that afternoon, a man in a black Nissan Micra was spotted on the phone while driving swiftly through Holyrood Park.

A spokeswoman for the road-safety charity Brake said the picture was "absolutely shocking".

She said: "We hoped that stricter penalties would raise awareness of the dangers of driving and talking on your mobile phone. But this appalling picture obviously catches the Edinburgh driver red-handed.

"It is high time the government took steps to ensure the law is properly enforced, and to extend the ban to reflect research which shows using a hands-free phone at the wheel can be equally deadly".

Motorists found flouting the rules could also see their car insurance costs rocket. AA Insurance warned that drivers who ended up with points on their licence from using a mobile could end up paying more than four times the fine through higher premiums.

It has been illegal to use a hand-held mobile behind the wheel since 1 December, 2003.

Home Office figures show that almost 74,000 fixed penalty notices were issued for illegal use of a mobile phone while driving in 2004. Over three weeks in Lothian and the Borders, officers observing more than 5,500 drivers found an average of one driver every five minutes using a phone.

Van and lorry drivers were the worst offenders - one in 22 of them was caught talking on a mobile.

• RANDOM breath tests are to be considered by the government in an attempt to cut drink-driving.

Ministers will launch a consultation later this year and insist they have an open mind on the issue.

But Stephen Ladyman, a UK transport minister, said: "If it helps us to improve enforcement and to really crack down on drink-driving, maybe it is something we have got to do."

Currently, police can impose breath tests only on motorists they suspect of being over the limit.

Despite a decline in drink-related deaths in 2005, they were still higher than in 1998 and 1999, at more than 500.

The Department for Transport said better enforcement of the existing blood-alcohol limit was the priority, rather than cutting it from 80mg to 50mg. But it also said Britain had better enforcement than many countries with lower limits.

The full article contains 602 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Bill, Dunblane,

28/02/2007 00:24:07

Maybe the guy in the picture was 'phoning the Scotsman to ask why we aren't allowed to comment on the main story of the day?

2

Road to the isles,

Wet, Wet, Wet 28/02/2007 08:15:33

Bill What are you moaning on about?

3

Andrew ICT,

Aberdeen 28/02/2007 08:40:28

Can the Scotsman not pass these pictures onto the ppolice and they can chase them up?

4

john montgomery,

28/02/2007 09:40:03

as keen runner in my rural area, I constantly see bad driving at close hand. use of mobiles is just another example of this. people seem to think driving is a right when it is a skill and unfortunately some do not have the skill to control the joined up thinking it involves. Having nearly been involved in two accidents including one which would have been a head on, with drivers on mobiles lets not have the usual dross about why not get after real criminals. well with 3500 killed and 10000 seriously injured on the roads each year who are the real criminals. unfortunately, we will always have those who run red lights, drink while driving and do other irresponsible things.

5

Brad,

Glasgow 28/02/2007 10:20:10

#5 well said. I too have been literally run off the road by a driver so engrossed in their conversation that they drove down the wrong side of a country road for hundreds of metres. And I was on a bike!

6

Salut,

Edinburgh 28/02/2007 10:42:06

I cycle anywhere i go in Edinburgh and the amount of times ive almost been hit by a car because they were on their mobiles is unreal. I find it worse at roundabouts how anyone can think they can turn a car round a roundabout with one hand on the steering wheel is beyond me. It wasnt too long ago we survived driving without using our mobile phones, dont see why we need them when where driving now.

But if you have good example of when you need your phone more than the cost of peoples lives then let me here it?

7

Finny,

Scottish Borders 28/02/2007 11:32:02

I also cycle to work and although I am lucky enough to have a cycle lane for part of the journey, drivers still come too close and drive too fast - many on their phones on the school run!

I can stand on my local high street and at least every 5th driver has a phone clamped to their ear.

The police are rarely seen on the streets since they got their new police station out of town - a beat police person is certainly a thing of the past - but if I can see this bad driving - why won't anyone do anything about it?

I frequently think about the 11 year old girl who was standing on the pavement and was killed by a motorist who lost control of his car whilst making a mobile phone call. This surely is good enough a reason to ban all mobile phone calls in cars.

8

Rod,

Kirkliston : mobile-free zone. 28/02/2007 11:32:52

The picture shows, I think, an expensive Land Rover vehicle. Bearing in mind the cost of such a vehicle, is the offending driver so impoverished that he cannot afford a hands-free kit which I understand costs in the region of £100? Is this particular incident part of the fur coat and nae knickers syndrome?
Perhaps our government should amend the legislation to force manufactures to fit hands-free facilities in all new vehicles produced after, say, 2010.

9

Brad,

Glasgow 28/02/2007 11:48:28

#8 Rod, having been the owner of 6 or 7 mobiles, none has ever come WITHOUT a hands-free kit!

#6, #7 if you see it, report it.

10

Finny,

Scottish Borders 28/02/2007 12:08:53

#9

My hubby walks the same route as I cycle and he talks to the dog walkers. One of the dog walkers has complained to the police about the speeding motorists and was told by an officer to "move to Cornwall where the roads are narrower and drivers can't speed".

I just hope that I'm not the unfortunate cyclist that gets hit by one of these morons.

11

petrol head,

Edinburgh 28/02/2007 13:35:51

I've said this before and I'll say it again. It is perfectly safe to use a mobile phone whilst driving provided the conditions allow it and the driver prioritizes his/her driving above the phone conversation.

This is a stupid law and is unenforcable on a mass scale. We should bin it and go back to the basis of "driving without due care and attention" or "dangerous driving" where phones are concerned.

Incompetent drivers don't need mobile phones to cause them to drive like morons---they do that anyway. This is just another inane "lowest common denominator" law.

12

ejstubbs,

Edinburgh 28/02/2007 13:46:37

#11: You can say whatever you like as often as you like, but without evidence to back it up you're not going to get very far. There is experimental evidence that using a mobile phone - even hands-free - impairs driving ability as much as being over the drink-driving limit. Do you think the drink-driving laws are also inane?

13

Rod,

Kirkliston - the European Village Jewel (2016) 28/02/2007 15:27:21

#9 Brad : #8 Rod, having been the owner of 6 or 7 mobiles, none has ever come WITHOUT a hands-free kit!

Thank you Brad. I have never owned a mobile telephone but have been in cars where there is a little cradle mounted on the dashboard. It all apparently hooks up to a microphone and antenna.
I see lots of drivers with what looks like a cochlear implant but am told it is some sort of wireless device (Bluebeard? Blackberry?) that allows hands-free communication.
The other thing I notice is that I can't ever recall seeing a cyclist howling into a mobile telephone.

14

petrol head,

Edinburgh 28/02/2007 15:27:32

OK you two (12 & 13) start producing "facts" instead of just making noises.

It IS possible to hold a conversation and drive in perfect safety. If you can't do more than one thing at once, you shouldn't be driving in the first place.

It's about prioritising. Nothing else.

15

Isabel,

28/02/2007 15:31:16

A better penalty would be £500 fine and 3 years disqualification.

16

geekpie,

forfar 28/02/2007 18:02:40

It's a numbers game like everything else in life. The more drivers are on their phones, the more drivers will be distracted by their phones. I welcome the increased penalties, but I'm still not sure it's enough of a deterent.

17

Bill, Dunblane,

28/02/2007 20:25:39

2 - Road etc.

Sorry!

When the Scotsman came on line at first this morning, there were no facilities to post on the main story. I thought they were doing another of the 'we ain't lettin' ye post' things. By the time I had complained on several other threads, the facility magically appeared.

18

Douglas,

Bathgate 28/02/2007 22:48:50

Rod#14: Cyclists don't have time to use mobile phones as they're concentrating on missing pedestrians on pavements, running red lights and swearing at insured road tax payers who apparently have no right to use the road.

19

Bill, Dunblane,

01/03/2007 02:19:01

19 - Douglas

YES! ;D

20

Frodo the Scot,

middle earth 01/03/2007 14:39:20

#14...Rod.... the phones you are refering to are called "Bluetooth" and they are attached to your ear, voice activated and for the fashion conscious they have chrome/colour combo's and some have little coloured flashing lights. No self-respecting nignog would be without one.

21

Frodo the Scot,

middle earth 01/03/2007 14:42:04

I forgot to add they make you look like a "BORG"


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.