Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mini-Meadowbank is new front runner as arena faces axe vote



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 March 2008
MEADOWBANK Stadium would be demolished and replaced with a smaller £25 million arena, under detailed plans revealed today.
The move would see the capacity of the stadium reduced from its original 16,500 to around 5000.

The proposals, set to go before councillors this week, would also involve selling off 8.5 acres of land at the west of the site for housing, with the s
tadium demolished and re-built to the east, resulting in the loss of the velodrome.

Opposition politicians today branded the move a major U-turn by the administration, while campaigners vowed to fight on to protect the site.

Originally, plans were drawn up to dispose of most of the Meadowbank site, with the proceeds put towards a new national stadium in Sighthill, capable of hosting major rugby and athletics events.

But the controversial idea of selling off land for housing became a major issue at last year's elections, leading to months of uncertainty when the Lib Dem/SNP administration took control of the city.

Officials say providing the equivalent of the Sighthill brief at a new Meadowbank Stadium would cost £57.9m, while a full refurbishment of the existing facilities has been priced at £42.7m.

The council's director of corporate services, Jim Inch, today said these options were just not affordable.

Instead, he has proposed scaled-down facilities, funded through £6m of council money, a £2m sportscotland grant, and £17m from the sale of land.

On top of the £25m construction costs, around £5m is likely to be spent on fitting out and developing the new centre.

The preferred option for the new Meadowbank would include a smaller 5000-seat stadium, indoor athletics facilities, four sports courts, changing rooms, and a gym and fitness studio.

Mr Inch said: "I recommend that the council agrees to progress detailed work on a new-build facility on Meadowbank.

"The proposal is to construct facilities with the intention of enabling further development in future years, should additional resources become available."

Councillors will vote on the plans at a vital meeting on Thursday. If the proposals are adopted, a consultation will be held with cycling groups about the provision of a new training facility to replace the velodrome, while discussions are also ongoing about locating Sportscotland's Edinburgh "hub" at Meadowbank.

Labour group sports spokesman Paul Godzik today said going ahead with demolition would be a "massive U-turn" by the administration, after the stadium won a reprieve from the bulldozers last summer. "The proposals look like a downgrading in the overall facilities offered in the Capital," he said.

Campaigners opposed to the sale or downgrading of Meadowbank hosted a rally last night. Bill Walker, a member of the Save Meadowbank Campaign, said: "We still believe Meadowbank can be refurbished.

"If the politicians don't listen to their communities, they are going to make Edinburgh the worst city for sport in the country."

Lib Dem councillor Gary Peacock said he was against selling land "if possible", but declined to say how he intended to vote on Thursday.

Stefan Tymkewycz, SNP councillor for the area, said: "I'm happy sports facilities will be retained at Meadowbank."





The full article contains 534 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 March 2008 10:33 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Meadowbank , Edinburgh Council
 
1

The Judge,

11/03/2008 12:02:01
Meggetland Mk2, I said months ago that Meadowbank would be sold off for housing, 2 bedroom rabbit hutches natch.

£25m plus "fitting out" costs of £5m, trust me it'll be closer to £40 odd million by the time the developer puts his final bill in.
2

Propaganda boy,

11/03/2008 12:09:43
Well at leat with all these new extra houses being built everywhere and the increase in council tax being recieved the reduction in Edinburgh council tax should be substantial? Hmmmmmmmmmmm!
3

Concerned Sighthill,

11/03/2008 12:42:01
Edinburgh citizens are having to settle for second best. I remember when Edinburgh could attract the likes of Linford Christie, Michael Johnston etc.
Now the City is run by small-minded people with small ambitions and no vision for the future.
4

Dunaskin,

Edinburgh 11/03/2008 12:58:57
I suppose Britain's most successful cycle track-racing team will have to re-locate, and become City of Glasgow Racing Team? Goodbye to Messrs Hoy and Maclean and all that they have inspired in the Capital....
5

Randan,

11/03/2008 14:24:32
£42m to refurbish my @rse!
Unless that is the cost without getting the money from selling public land which is not theirs to sell.

I hate Edinburgh Council.
6

Apple,

edinburgh 11/03/2008 14:38:28
Should there be ANY sell-off of land at Meadowbank then the Council should hang their heads in shame. Several credible solutions have been put forward to the council regarding refurbishment and funding for this.

Why does any of the current land need to be sold off? Why can't all the facilities be retained with a view to refurbishing them in stages? Why do they not appear to have approached the private sector for sponsorship in an attempt to raise money. It may not be ideal but at least it's way of ensuring that the whole faciltiy stays and that it's upgraded to modern standards. They (the council) are trying to make out that the city of Edinburgh will actually gain something from a new build. How can there be a gain when facilities are being reduced?

The lack of vision from the council on the issue of sporting facilites is abysmal, as is the lack of consideration for the most important people, i.e. the people who elected them and to whom they are accountable to.

#5 you are spot-on: that land is not the council's to sell.
7

Ecco Warrier,

Embra 11/03/2008 16:04:55
Here we go again. What a great job this New Administration is doing. Edinburgh again is the loser on sports facilities. New Sighthill stadium is gone and what are we left with , a mini Meadowbank.
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 11/03/2008 16:38:23
THe athletics stadium may be clapped out (neglected) but there is nothing wrong with the Sports Hall part.

I reckon the only reason for that part's demolition is that it is in the middle of the site and our wonderful council want the west and middle part to sell off as a contiguous plot for housing, therefore demolish The Sports Halls and rebuild on the rump east part of the site - nothing to do with the state of the existing Sports Halls.
9

HZ,

11/03/2008 17:04:49
5,000 capacity would rule it out as potential new home for Edinburgh Rugby - and deny the stadium what could have proved to have been a very good and regular income source
10

Top Floor,

11/03/2008 17:35:44


This looks like the worst of shoddy compromises.

In the end no-one will get what they really want and the whole city will be poorer as a result.
11

Moscow Central 42,

11/03/2008 17:55:13

You have to remember that we are talking Lib Dems here. They just don't do the vision thing, and they always think small.
12

micky,

edinburgh 11/03/2008 19:57:18
I wonder how much has been frittered away on the Usher Hall "refurbishments" in recent years ? I would suggest many more people use Meadowbank on a regular basis !
Mr Godzik,Labour group, what a cheek you have in criticising !!!!

The SNP/LibDem group should remember they were elected to save Meadowbank as well as other sports facilities,this decision & others such as scrapping Play4it & Go4it has lost my vote for next election. The only party commited to saving Meadowbank in its present format are the Greens !
13

MAB,

Edinburgh 11/03/2008 20:40:42
Remember under Labour the whole thing would have went!!!
Where was the investment in our sports facilities under them!!!
Short memories you lot who critisise the council.

14

Tuppenceworth,

edinburgh 11/03/2008 22:18:04
There's nae point moaning about what's happened in the past.
This council has to show that it represents the people who voted them in, and the retention of ALL of the Meadowbank site will demonstrate that they believe there is a future for sport for all in Edinburgh. Yes, they have financial constraints but a phased refurbishment over a number of years is all that is required. Selling off public land in a prime site is tantamount to theft and they will be held accountable.

15

heatherp,

Happy Glen 11/03/2008 23:18:09
Over 200 people attended a save Meadowbank meeting in Abbey Church. A unanimous show of hands was against any sell off of land at this site. Chris Black said if you want your kitchen refurbished you don't sell off your lounge to pay for it, you wait till you have the money or you cut your cloth accordingly.
It is perfectly possible to refurbish Meadowbank over time, it will not fall done in the mean time. Over the next 5 years we can spend 30 million doing it up, we just need the vision something no council has had. We need sports facilities fit for purpose and affordable.
Save Meadowbank campaign urges the council to consider properly the suggestions we have put forward repeatedly. They should consider long and hard before making such a momentous decision...once its gone its gone.
Sports facilities enhanced on all of the Meadowbank site, now there is a vision!
16

eric,

Lothian 12/03/2008 12:45:04
3 I agree.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.