Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Martian probe 'may have killed off alien life it was seeking'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 January 2007
EARLY NASA probes visiting Mars 30 years ago may have stumbled upon life on the Red Planet - and inadvertently destroyed it.
The two Viking spacecraft of 1976-7 were looking for the wrong kind of life and would not have recognised the kind of alien microbes they might have found, delegates attending the American Astronomical Society in Seattle have been told.

The race
to find extra- terrestrial life on Mars is one of the most exciting challenges facing scientists, with the NASA Phoenix Mars mission leaving in the summer and the Aurora European project developing technology to land on the planet.

The report, based on a more expansive view of where life can take root, could see Phoenix looking for a different type of Martian life form.

Last month, photographs of Mars showed geological changes suggesting water occasionally flowed there - the most tantalising sign Mars is hospitable to life.

In the 1970s, the Viking mission found no signs of life. But Professor Dirk Schulze-Makuch, author of the latest research, said it was looking for Earth-like life, in which salt water is the internal liquid of living cells.

Given the cold, dry conditions on Mars, life could have evolved with the key internal fluid a mix of water and hydrogen peroxide.

Prof Schulze-Makuch, of Washington State University's department of geology, said one Viking experiment poured water on soil, which would have drowned hydrogen peroxide-based life.

Another experiment, which involved heating soil, would have baked Martian microbes.

Prof Schulze-Makuch acknowledges he cannot prove Martian microbes exist, but, he said, "it makes sense".

Dr John Davies, project scientist at the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh, said: "Prof Schulze-Makuch's statement is perfectly reasonable considering the assumptions made at the time and the fact there was always some ambiguity about the test results.

"There is no evidence on the surface for life such as animals, fish or grass, but the belief now is that any kind of terrestrial life could be microbes living a few inches under the soil to avoid ultra violet radiation."

Professor John Brown, the Astronomer Royal for Scotland, said: "There is general concern over machines landing in space and contaminating the environment. We should not just assume we are not killing things.

"We need to be more careful about what we are doing."

Prof Schulze-Makuch's research coincides with work being completed by a National Research Council (NRC) panel nicknamed the "weird life" committee. The group is concerned that scientists looking for extraterrestrial life may be too Earth-centric.

The problem for scientists searching for life is that "you only find what you're looking for", said Professor Katherine Freeman, of Penn State University's geosciences department and a reviewer of the NRC work.

www.nasa.gov

www.thespaceplace.com

50 YEARS OF SEARCHING


IN THE 1950s, it was believed there could be life on Mars.

Six missions to Mars by the USSR and US in the early 1960s failed.

After Mariner 4, the US mission, sent images back in 1967 of a cratered surface, it was assumed Mars was barren.

In 1971, that changed after Mariner 9, the US's Mars orbiter, sent hi-resolution images showing river and channel-like features.

In 1976, two US missions, Viking 1 and 2, found no life.

In 2003, robots from the US Mars Exploration Rover Mission showed water had existed on Mars.

This summer, Phoenix will study the surface of Mars' high-northern latitudes.

And in 2009, a mobile scientific laboratory will land on a site chosen for its life-sustaining capacity.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

scottwebb.co.uk,

09/01/2007 02:09:27

Quote: EARLY NASA probes visiting Mars 30 years ago may have stumbled upon life on the Red Planet - and inadvertently destroyed it...........Dooh :)

2

Oliver F,

UK 09/01/2007 06:39:23

Its life, Jim, but not as we know it...

3

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 09/01/2007 07:53:16

If Mars has a breathable-atmosphere , it could be used for relocating anti-social neighbours etc.

4

eric,

09/01/2007 08:10:00

We could send Jack To Mars ,But what have the Martians done to deserve that,Then again its Life they are looking for!

5

Billy,

Germany 09/01/2007 10:38:38

The race to find life on mars. The race with who exactly, have they discoverd that the chinks or russkies are about to go to Mars ?. Next they will be telling us they DID land on the moon.

6

Messalina,

09/01/2007 10:40:08

As I said elsewhere ......

Join the Space race ...... seek out exotic alien lifeforms ...... and kill them!

7

IanW,

Germany 09/01/2007 11:23:23

Paul Voltaire #3 - Why bother with an atmosphere for them?

8

Duncan,

SCOTLAND where IT REALLY IS TIME 09/01/2007 11:26:55

A bit like the BBC, who went to interview a farmer who had a rare duck.

They ran over it as they drove into hid farmyard.

9

Mr Gump,

Port Lambton,Ontario, Canada 09/01/2007 18:35:57

This is a complete crock of baloney story.
So much pseudo science around. One story reads adding milk to your tea is harmful. Another story read 3% milk is better for you and yet another reads.......CHEESE - the new death food.

As a retired scientist, I find all this pseudo pretend BS science most disturbing.

No wonder the public doesn't believe anything anymore reported as science.

10

Bill, Dunblane,

From a distance....... 09/01/2007 23:52:22

Today, US space bombers devastated vast areas of Mars that were known, based on detailed secret service reports, to harbour terrorists with links to the 9/11 attack.

UK prime minister Tony Blair announced that he had irrefutable evidence that the Martians had weapons that could be launched at Earth within 45 minutes.

Lord Goldsmith agreed that under interplanetary law, the attack on Mars was indeed lawful, although he refused to elaborate on the reasoning behind his decision.

Reports last week that Mars had massive oil reserves have been dismissed as a complete fantasy by a government spokesperson.

11

Nandan Bhandari,

India 10/01/2007 03:46:32

Life could exist in various forms. Life is the one which can reproduce by itself, utilises energy directly on indirectly from sun for its growth. It may not have cell wall like us. May exist in gaseous form. Need not have Carbon cycle. May use material like sulphur as basic material. Hence search for life should be based on the composition of gases and crust material existing on that planet. Model should be developed to find out what type life chemistry can exist in such conditions.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.