Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


UN Lockerbie trial observer urges independent inquiry into the case

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
07 July 2007
THE United Nations observer appointed to oversee the Lockerbie trial has called on Alex Salmond, the First Minister, to agree to demands for an international inquiry into the handling of the case.
Dr Hans Köchler has written to Mr Salmond and Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, calling for experts from countries not involved in the case to investigate the way the investigation was conducted by UK and US authorities.

His letter follows the de
cision by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC), announced last week, to grant a fresh appeal into the conviction of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi.

In a summary of its 800-page report, released following a three-year review into the case, the SCCRC said it had found six grounds which indicated that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred.

These concentrated on the evidence of Tony Gauci, the Maltese shopkeeper who said a man resembling Megrahi had bought clothes from his shop which were found to have been wrapped around the bomb that brought down Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie on 21 December, 1988, killing 270 people.

The SCCRC also said it rejected nearly 50 other grounds presented by Megrahi's defence team.

It also dismissed claims that Megrahi's original defence team was incompetent and rejected an attack on the credibility of a key witness, forensic expert Allen Feraday. The SCCRC also rejected claims evidence was invented to lead a trail to Libya.

"The commission has found no basis for concluding that evidence in the case was fabricated by the police, the Crown, forensic scientists or any other representatives of official bodies or government agencies," it said.

Such exoneration of the authorities was described as "rather strange" by Dr Köchler, who concluded in an earlier report that the original Camp Zeist trial was "not fair and was not conducted in an objective manner".

In his letter, Dr Köchler called for "a full and independent public inquiry of the Lockerbie case and its handling by the Scottish judiciary as well as the British and US political and intelligence establishments".

He also called for the SCCRC's full report to be made public.

His letter states: "In order to avoid bias, such an investigation will require the participation of additional legal experts, to be appointed by the United Nations Organisation, from countries that are not involved in the Lockerbie dispute.

"Those politicians in the United Kingdom and the United States who have proclaimed an international 'war on terror' will not be credible in their strategy if they prevent a full investigation into the causes of the explosion of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie. All those responsible, without exception, must be brought to justice."

His call for an independent inquiry was last night backed by the Reverend John Mosey, whose daughter was killed in the disaster, a member of the support group UK Families Flight 103.

"There has to be some sort of independent inquiry. We have been calling for that for some time. I realise it wouldn't necessarily be a public inquiry at all times because it would have to deal with the dissemination of highly-sensitive intelligence.

"An international panel of experts would guarantee a certain open-mindedness. The problem with an inquiry in Scotland, composed of Scottish legal establishment figures, is who can we trust to chair it? Who is not establishment? This proposal has some mileage in it."

A Scottish Executive spokeswoman said: "Our focus remains fixed on ensuring that justice is done in the public interest. "

HEARING WILL BE NEXT YEAR

AN appeal over the conviction of Megrahi will not be heard until well into 2008.

There has been speculation that a hearing could be staged as early as this year, but such a timescale will be impossible to meet for the Libyan's defence team.

Following the move to grant a fresh appeal, Tony Kelly, Megrahi's lawyer, said he had "a blank sheet" upon which to write a new set of grounds to try to have the conviction quashed.



The full article contains 679 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 July 2007 8:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Eric,,The Viking,, (AKA,,/,,Trojan )),

07/07/2007 00:23:19

I do hope First Minister Salmond will put his full weight behind a full and independent inquiry.

2

Eric,,The Viking,, (AKA,,/,,Trojan )),

07/07/2007 00:26:34

Such an inquiry, of course, will be resisted intensely by London and Washington as the last thing they want revealed is the truth.

When the truth is finaly revealed, heads will be on the block.

3

sandee,

Louisiana-US 07/07/2007 02:21:20

Hardly heard a word of this in the US. I believe Washington will try to pin Iran for this all the while doing all possible to deflect any invovement from itself. Bush's papa WAS in charge when it happened coincidentally.

If the US was to point fingers in another direction AGAIN would prove fruitless. This country is on the edge of implosion from all the death it's lies have caused or either caused death, then lied.

Every bombing and preemptive action that took place in which the US interest was served should be reinvestigated.

For the US to be found at fault on any level for Lockerbie would have far reaching implications for 9-11.

4

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich/Switzerland 07/07/2007 04:41:22

Demand for a criminal investigation against some
person's of the Lockerbie Criminal Trial team (Crown Office) in Edingburg and officers of the Scottish police.

see more information and a new video on the website: http://www.lockerbie.ch

5

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 07/07/2007 05:19:21

Mair c**p from conspiracy mongers .......... the mannie wuz guilty ....................

6

Alberto.,

07/07/2007 06:47:41

Oh! Dearie! Dearie! me.

Getting at the truth - it seems they will have to trust in the Lord - or somebody else on a high plain, there seems to be no trust available from many of those at the 'Top of the shop' - almost everywhere!

I understand there is a plan amongst our politicians, not yet fully agreed, to always tell the truth - no matter what.

However, there is still one major stumbling block to overcome, and it's a typical beauty from 'the boys and girls' - as we might expect. The 'arrangement' will be accepted as long as their statements and declarations can be guaranteed never to come to the ears of the Public, and certainly not the Press!

Obviously such a guarantee is necessary for that old but well used excuse - 'National Security’ purposes!'

Needless to say, in view of such tremendous pressure being applied to their 'duties' than hitherto, negotiations for the extra salary 'adjustments' (I think they mean up!) are still and always will be – ongoing, but are, no doubt, well under way regardless!

Still, it's something for the Public to look forward to with immense interest and amazement, and clearly indicating that in Politics - there is never a dull moment!

7

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 07/07/2007 07:05:22

#5

re the mannie being guilty.
is it april fools day?
magrahi was stitched up by firstly britain, the usa,
cia,fbi,mi5,mi6, the scottish police, the judicial,
you name it they did it.


if the truth ever comes out there would be hell to pay, the ramifications would shake the world,
and show that our goverments and other connected agencies are not to be trusted.

8

Thomas J,

Dunfermline 07/07/2007 08:30:29

The world is watching us and how we dispense justice. The SCCRC did themselves no favours by making a judgement that on the one hand said that there may have been a miscarriage of justice but on the other hand said that the police, Crown Office and Judges etc. were all totally blameles. The SCCRC doth protest too much methinks. Let them publish the full report for a start and then we can begin to understand their reasoning for this curious absolution of their peers.
The suggestion of an independent public inquiry witnessed by UN Observers seems pretty fair to me. Those grieving relatives of the victims deserve no less.

9

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich/Switzerland 07/07/2007 09:18:49

The Lockerbie-Affair:

The douptful and strange behavior of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and the total cost's must also be analyzed; very obviously certain persons in the Brithis and /or Scottish police and legal system want to cover up something.

They conceal their criminal forgery of evidence through suppression of facts in order to release these persons and to enable an explanation of their offenses.

The cost for this (what) rubbish, cost the scottish Tax payers: English Pound 1.108.536.--!

More news and a new Video on the website: http://www.lockerbie.ch

10

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 07/07/2007 09:29:45

mebo ltd, #10

maybe you should visit the shirley mckie, forum on lockerbie.

http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/index.php

11

Colin B,

Bearsden 07/07/2007 10:45:53

Hans

The investigators can find
Lord Colin Boyd at Dundas and Wilson 191 West George Street, Glasgow
Chief Con Willie Rae at Pitt Street Police Station, Glasgow

and Ex Chief Con John Orr at Kilmarnock FC

Wonder if there was a Conspiracy or if we are all worrying about nothing. Since Lord Turnbull was so keen on Advocate's Standards and Perjury in the Sheridan v Mews of The World case I wonder if he will be so forthcoming in the Lockerbie Enquiry since he appeared for the Crown after Plodder Boyd?

Hope This Helps

Colin

12

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 07/07/2007 12:02:47

It's interesting to see Dr Köchler's name in the news again. It always seemed his very critical report on the court proceedings received more attention overseas than it did it here. And I don't recall ever hearing any official response to his observations.

Was his report flawed, or were we so embarrassed to have Scottish justice held up to ridicule that we just stuck our heads in the sand?

13

0racle,

Essex 07/07/2007 13:51:41

The excuse for not holding an independent inquiry at this stage will of course be that the matter is "sub judice", while Megrahi's second appeal against conviction is unlikely to be heard before mid-2008 at the earliest.

Let us hope that Megrahi's solicitor, Tony Kelly, is as good as his word, and that all aspects of the Lockerbie investigation that produced this "miscarriage of justice" are brought before the Court of Criminal Appeal.

The appeal should look closely at the role of the following:
* FBI's "explosives expert" Thomas Thurman, who was reported to have been at the Lockerbie crash site by 23 December 1988, and says he was the one who identified the Mebo timer fragment in June 1990;
* RARDE's Alan Feraday, who helped Thurman fabricate the evidence against Libya; and,
* RARDE's Dr Thomas Hayes who is scientifically qualified but who failed to test the Mebo timer fragment for explosives residue.

And, speaking of Mebo (whose owner Edwin Bollier keeps telling readers of the Scotsman to check his website) the court should examine Bollier's earlier incarnation as the owner of a pirate radio station with links to Libya (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_North_Sea_Internationa...).

Bollier was at one stage going to be charged as a co-conspirator along with Fhimah and Megrahi, but because he threatened to call witnesses such as President Bush Senior and Margaret Thatcher in his defence, the Lord Advocate (probably wisely) had second thoughts!

I hope - but doubt - that Megrahi's second appeal will deal with all of these issues. However, I'm sure there will still be a need for a proper independent inquiry into the Lockerbie bombing.

14

Spring Rain,

USA 07/07/2007 17:21:28

Kochler is a PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR, FOR GOD'S SAKE! What in hell does he know about evidence? Answer: NOTHING!

And would SOMEONE get that evil force MEBO-The unindicted co-conspirators for the 271 Lockerbie bombing deaths, maker of the Meister and Bolier MST-13 Timer that detonated the bomb-OFF THIS BLOODY SITE with their disingenuous and evil PR campaign to make people believe it was someone other than themselves responsible for this death and destruction?

15

The Fly Fifer,

07/07/2007 17:43:58

16 absolutely !!!

16

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 07/07/2007 18:08:12

oh i see the al magrahi did it team are here,
#16 spring, so the un must be incompetent then.
not the uk or american goverments oh no.

there is no such things as cover ups, from goverment departments oh no.
the police and judicial are always right
the sccrc are bottle merchants truth.

http://kevin-freethekillie2.blogspot.com/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/big-wullie/

17

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 07/07/2007 19:31:24

#16 Spring Rain

"Kochler is a PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR, FOR GOD'S SAKE! What in hell does he know about evidence? Answer: NOTHING!"

Was that the official response to his observations?

18

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 07/07/2007 19:48:05

#16 Spring Rain

"And would SOMEONE get that evil force MEBO-The unindicted co-conspirators for the 271 Lockerbie bombing deaths, maker of the Meister and Bolier MST-13 Timer that detonated the bomb-OFF THIS BLOODY SITE"

That would deny me the right to hear their comments. How would you fell if someone suggested that your comments should be removed until we had evidence that you were not a CIA plant?

19

2Right,

On Location 07/07/2007 20:42:16

Hans Kochler

Appointed by the UN Has doubts about "Scots Justice" He is not the only one.
SCCRC decision does nothing to cure miscarriages nor enhance Public Confidence in our Judicial System.
The Beck Case Highlighted by Freethekillie2 above shows that SCCRCs loyalty to Bill Taylor runs very deep within the ranks at SCCRC ( After all Taylor sat on their commission) and in both cases Lockerbie and Beck SCCRC were never going to find "Fault" with their own.
Self Regulation does not work and the UN should demand urgent investigations into the workings with SCCRC Supposedly Independent Body whose sole sponsors are Justice Department.
Mr Megrahi is entitled to his appeal on the evidence produced, The whole of Scotland think he should never have been convicted on such flimsy evidence.
SCCRC have yet to find any fault in all the Anderson Appeals it receives???????????.
Visit the following link for more debates about Lockerbie and Beck's case.

http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/sutra34.php#34

http://williambeck.blogspot.com/

20

2Right,

On Location 07/07/2007 21:25:18

Hans Kochler has every right to be suspicious of SCCRC wonder if he has heard their lataest video on You-Tube at:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DP-ACuK1w0I
Quite clearly Robin Johnston who also investigated lockerbie was caught with his trousers down by Mr Beck.
It is also worrying that if true then the Lockerbie Bomber is on his second appeal and Beck complaining of the same Mr Taylor QC since 1982 has never had one appeal.
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=425979886&size=l

21

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 07/07/2007 21:39:21

#22,
too right. it is not only the case of mr beck, but the cases of many in scotland the sccrc have been under scutiny,

lockerbie will go down in history,
that the day justice died in our scottish crown office.

22

Wee Lou,

Coventry 07/07/2007 21:42:39

Once again Scots Justice in the dock, And rightly so.
No one is happy with the findings of this so called independent body (SCCRC) who investigated Megrahi's case.
It would seem only in Scotland that SCCRC would have us rely solely on Police evidence for convictions but once they are Ex Policemen....... Their evidence becomes Un-Reliable and not Credible.
Are we to believe that Police are now liars???
Are we to believe that police dont tell lies???
The very same is happening with the Nat Fraser case.
Crown are trying to claim the police who have now come forward and said the rings were planted are not Credible nor reliable witnesses.
The whole sorry saga is shocking and an affront to Scottish People.
Hans is quite rightly asking for the UN to intervene and lets back this call for Justice along with the Shirley McKie case Lockerbie should be fully investigated by SNP and not allow this Corruption to stain our Name any longer

23

Wee Lou,

Coventry 07/07/2007 21:47:58

I am alarmed at the allegations above that a Foreign National can have two appeals and a fellow Scot, Mr Beck is not allowed one appeal.
Mr Johnston heard assuring Mr Beck That a certain Lawyer was sent his own ID Parade report when clearly he had'nt should be asked to resign from the SCCRC and to think the same person has now investigated the Lockerbie case and found nothing untoward with his defence also is shocking.
I wonder if Megrahi has any tapes of Johnston eh?

24

2Right,

On Location 07/07/2007 22:16:01

Spring Rain
See youve been allowed out for the weekend again.
You keep spouting about Megrahi being guilty yet you produce no evidence for your theory?
Merely spouting will get you absolutely nowhere.
We the majority i think believe Megrahi to have been in the wrong place at the wrong time and the victim of a serious and elaborate Miscarriage of Justice.
We also believe SCCRC are not Independent when you look at their panel who sit in Judgement.
Ex Police.
Ex Judges.
Ex PFs.
And sitting Judges, How dare they even try to claim Independence.
SNP should sort this sorry excuse for Scots Justice and end the corruption created by Labour.
If a foreign National is allowed two Appeals then surely our own People are allowed one Appeal?

25

USAMan (without cape),

USA 08/07/2007 00:04:42

It sounds like the Lockerbie affair has the same problems the U.S. has: is there anywhere in the world a politician or policeman with a pre-arranged agenda that can be trusted? No, not in the United States, nor in Scotland, nor anywere. Sorry (those few of you commenters on this list with stardust in your eyes and disinfo at your ready), but truth and reality must invade from time to time. Hooray for truth and reality!

26

USAMan (without cape),

USA 08/07/2007 00:16:09

And one other wee matter: why would anybody (especially judges, policemen or politicians) be averse to a fair, open and impartial hearing
on any matter under the sun? I am not averse to such things. I know other citizens that are not averse to such things. Why, then, would government officials be averse to such things unless they have something to hide? I think I can say that anybody that is afraid to publicly air a public matter in a fair and impartial way with adjudicators that are not intimately connected to said events, is (are) more than likely interested in hiding some kind of culpability. Can I say such a thing? Is there anybody that could argue against it?

27

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 08/07/2007 00:53:05

#28 USAMan (without cape)

"Is there anybody that could argue against it?"

They may be hiding culpability, but as Napolean advised, we should first consider whether they're just hiding incompetence. It's the difference between a conspiracy theory and a "complete mess" theory. :-)

28

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich/switzerland 08/07/2007 01:40:33

Libya had no motif for a bombing attack on PanAm 103!

The entire blaming of Libya was the crime of U.S. IMPERIALISM against the nord African country Libya;
the rest was concocted by U.S. and British government agents and experts, who had control of the evidence, like the wrong Main Evidence: the manipulation of the MEBO MST-13 Timerfragment!

29

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich/Switzerland 08/07/2007 01:54:29

Please visit our website and look the video on: http://www.lockerbie.ch

30

American,

USA 08/07/2007 06:09:57

#30-Ed & Mahnaz- According to the BBC (& CNN to name another)
"In an interview, Atef Abu Bakr says Abu Nidal told a meeting of his Fatah-Revolutionary Council that he had organised the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 270 people."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2211327.stm

BTW-Abu Nidal was a major terrorist head who lived in iraq. He was killed (or as iraq reported it-committed suicide) before the war.

Sorry, but I think the bbc & cnn website is a bit more credible than yours (although, I rarely believe the bbc & cnn).

31

Croman mac Nessa,

08/07/2007 10:45:28

16, "evidence" is the standard for providing strong support for a conclusion in Inductive Logic. Premises in Inductive Logic must rely on an Empirical approach. All of this is very much part of the purview of Philosophy: Logic (both Deductive and Inductive) are within the domain of Philosophy, and Empiricism is one school of thought in the realm of Epistemology, which is a branch of Philosophy. Who better to deal with questions of Reasoning, Evidence, Knowledge, Truth, Coherence, Consistency, etc, than a Professor of Philosophy?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.