Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Lib Dem leader: Speaker 'very wrong' over expenses

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the scotsman.com site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 May 2009
OPEN criticism of Commons Speaker Michael Martin escalated today as Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said his handling of the latest expenses crisis had been "very wrong".
Mr Martin angrily slapped down MPs, including Lib Dem Norman Baker, who challenged him yesterday as he made an emergency statement on the situation – sparking threats of a no-confidence motion in the Speaker.

Asked about the performance, Mr Clegg
suggested he should have reflected the need for Parliament to apologise to voters over the use of taxpayer-funded allowances.

"I think the Speaker got it wrong, very wrong," he said.

"It is clear Parliament as a whole owes an apology to the British public. He needs to reflect that sense of apology and the urgency for new rules that put MPs beyond any further suspicion."

Tory MP Douglas Carswell is seeking six fellow MPs to support a no-confidence motion in an attempt to oust Mr Martin.

Despite long-running disquiet about Mr Martin among backbenchers, it is notoriously difficult for MPs to oust a sitting Speaker because of the power he has in the chamber.

But Mr Carswell said last night: "Events this afternoon have probably made my job a little easier.

"It is because of this man that we have got into this situation.
"Anyone who is capable of doing the job would have seen all of this coming and realised that in a modern democracy we need transparency.

"I would hope that I could find 1% of parliamentarians to support me."

Mr Martin, who has long faced criticism for fighting greater openness over MPs' expenses, was visibly infuriated when he was challenged over the decision to refer the expenses leak to the police.

Labour backbencher Kate Hoey said the inquiry was an "awful waste of money" at a time when the police already had a "huge job" to do in London.

She was cut short by Mr Martin who told her: "I just say to you, it's easy to say to the press 'This should not happen'. It's a wee bit more difficult when you just don't have to give quotes to the press and do nothing else.

"Some of us in this House have other responsibilities."

Mr Baker – another critic of the way that the House handled the issue – described Mr Martin's response as "disgraceful".

"The Speaker's job is to lead the House of Commons in a constructive way and to recognise the need to unite the House and to recognise the genuine concerns of the public," he said.

"Instead, he appeared to be defending vested interests. I thought it was disgraceful the way that he dealt with Kate Hoey in particular."



The full article contains 452 words and appears in scotsman.com newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Observer,,

Glasgow 12/05/2009 13:45:39
Actually it is the job of the Speaker to defend the vested interests of MP's. This idea that he is there to keep some kind of check on them is erroneous. But even taking his actual role, as opposed to his supposed role, into account, he isn't very good at it.

In fact it would be extremely difficult to make up a character that could have handled this situation any worse than he has.


2

Rosscobhoy,

12/05/2009 13:55:33
"Some of us in this House have other responsibilities."

The first and most important reponsibility of anyone in the elected house, is to represent those who voted for them. Us.
3

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 12/05/2009 16:05:59
The Speaker is well out of touch and while he admonishes members to adhere to the spirit of the rules, his own record in this regard is tainted.

He just doesn't get it that "hard-working families" are no longer prepared to put up with the type of shoddy troughing and cover-up work at which he excels and have had enough of New "Labour" corruption, incompetence, excess and placing their own political survival above all else.

A sea-change is needed in this type of politics; one where the voters and taxpayers have much more say in the way the country is governed.
4

Sgian Achlais,

12/05/2009 17:28:55
The whole Westminster system is corrupt and full of elitist nonsense.

The speaker is a prime example of a man who should know better, who came up hard through the tough times in a difficult era. He is employed by the people of Glasgow to support them to to fleece them.

Shame on you Mr Martin.

As for all the titles, Gongs, robes, and fancery. It is not a pantomime it is supposed to be government.

If I went to a business meeting and started waving paper and jeering I would be sacked.

I want these lazy people to get on with the job and stop lining their own pockets.

How many Labour MP's entered parliament as working class and left as millionaires. Tells its own story.
5

Sgian Achlais,

12/05/2009 17:31:24
Do we really need this many MP's/MSP's/councillors/Lords/Advisors/Quangos/Consultants, etc, etc

We the people are the fools. We allow them to rob us and we just take it.
6

Desmo,

Lumphinnans 12/05/2009 17:49:22
#3 Former Mr. Angry.

I don`t think many would believe that the Speaker was sincere when he reminded MPs about the spirit of the rules.

In fact, these rules were revealed on C4 news last night to have been cleverly worded and structured so as to enable this profligacy at taxpayer`s expense to be permitted.

#1 Observer.

Don`t you think the preservation of personal and institutional credibility of MPs and Parliament respectively is in the Speaker`s brief ?

Now that all of this is out in the open, Michael Martin`s sanity must be questioned if he really believes that going after the mole is going to advance either of these.

His treatment of Kate Hoey yesterday resembled that of a wee ned who,in his opinion, has been "stuck in".

The man is a disgrace to his office.

Funniest bit for me today, though, was listening to that galloping gabshecht Foulkes trying to defend him.

Priceless.
7

smokey joe 1,

12/05/2009 18:19:58
6
Spot on.
Martin was out of order for the disgusting way he attacked Kate Hoey,it is not within his pig swilling remit to make personal attcks on MP,s who are only stating public opinion
It,s no wonder that the few decent Mps that are left want this thug removed.


8

Colin B,

Bearsden 12/05/2009 19:20:38
of course he is wrong - he's a working class ned who has low standards if integrity and decency- he should be a bin man.
9

Observer,,

Glasgow 12/05/2009 20:02:53
8 You are a revolting snob who should retreat to your spam valley home in Bearsden and cease bothering the rest of us forthwith.

6 Yes the preservation of the position of MP's is within the Speaker's remit, but not necessarily their integrity.

Kate Hoey went against the interests of other MP's. That's how Martin sees it.
10

Jo'Burg Jock,

South Africa 12/05/2009 20:16:20
I agree with most of the above

Michael Martin's "record is tainted"

Michael Martin is "a disgrace to his office"

Michael Martin is "a wee ned"

Michael Martin is a "pig" with his snout deeply in the trough

Michael Martin is "thug"

But I disagree with Colin. I know some very intelligent people who are bin men (they are prepared to do an honest days work), who do a decent job.

Michael Martin is incapable of rising to their standards.
11

Astonished,

12/05/2009 21:01:39
I am so glad colin B @ 8 is a well known unionist.


His comments at 8 are probably the most stupid I have read for some time. And with ' alex the dalek and his merry monikers ' that is saying something.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.