Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Swift action on oil fire concerns

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 July 2009
YOU reported on the safety of the GB Oils Ltd site in Lerwick, Shetland, (News, 28 June).
The report is based on information released under the Freedom of Information Act by Sepa following an inspection in December 2008 to measure the site's compliance (for secondary and tertiary containment) with a policy issued in February 2008 (COMAH
Competent Authority Policy on Containment of Bulk Hazardous Liquids at COMAH Establishments, 20 February, 2008). This policy was developed after the Buncefield incident in 2005.

GB Oils Ltd received the official response to the inspection from Sepa on 16 February, 2009 and replied on 12 March, 2009 to clarify our compliance with the above standard and proposed an action plan going forward. This response is in the public domain. GB Oils Ltd works closely with the competent authorities to implement standards and best practices.

GB Oils Ltd acquired the Lerwick site in March 2007 from BP and has already invested significant sums of money on improving the site's infrastructure.

The bund walls have been strengthened and fire-resistant plates fitted to all external joints in August 2008. Bottom loading was installed in 2008 to improve tanker loading safety.

Scotland on Sunday highlighted three areas of concern:

"The fire resistance of the bund floor liner."

GB Oils Ltd recognise that the existing liner is not fire-resistant but to date have not found a suitable alternative for the site which combines fire resistance with the required permeability (leak tightness).

"Bund walls might not be strong enough."

GB Oils Ltd strengthened the bund walls in 2008.

"Bund capacity not large enough."

GB Oils Ltd proposed a solution which meets the requirements of the standard in 2007, and are still discussing with Sepa. Our contention is that the bund is capable of containing 110 per cent of the largest tank or 25 per cent of the combined volume as required by HS (G) 176.

Claire Chalmers, GB Oils, Lerwick





The full article contains 328 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2009 9:50 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.