Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Let's see a probe into permission for monstrosity



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

JOHN BYROM says that planners have shown poor judgement over the proposed giant hotel for Haymarket (Letters, August 5). Isn't there a real quandary here with our planners?
They propose to allow a 17-storey hotel to be built, yet I recall them forcing "Beanscene" to remove insignificant copper lampholders from above their shop frontage in Holyrood Road, where there are not two buildings with the same architectural style
or heritage, because they did not fit in with the surroundings in a heritage site.

Shouldn't we question what powerful force "persuaded" our planners to grant their approval for this latest blot-to-be on Edinburgh's skyline?

And, shouldn't a public inquiry not only be about whether to finally allow this architectural monstrosity to be built, but also into the conduct of the planners responsible for the decision, and the councillors who granted their approval to it?
Jim Taylor, The Murrays Brae, Edinburgh

Charges hit wrong note with buskers
INTO the first week of the Fringe and many buskers and street performers are expressing concerns over the organisation of their rotas and performance timings. This has been exacerbated because of the money being charged to allow them to perform.

I have spoken to a few over two days, some who have much experience of the High Street.

Rumours are starting up that some may leave because of these difficulties.

This year is by far the worst they have experienced; many are bitter because of the initial charge which has reaped no benefit.
Tom Reilly, Esslemont Road, Edinburgh

Farmers are living a life of luxury
ON reading MEP Struan Stevenson's letter on August 2 I had to reply. Farmers and the NFU would still complain if money trees grew in their fields! Firstly, banning so called "safe" herbicides ie weed killer. Safe they say? You ask the farmer to drink the liquid from his sprayer, even diluted, go on try some ... I think not!

I've just moved from the country to Edinburgh. Poor farmers, I don't think so ... they live a life of luxury, helped by the subsidies paid from our taxes. They will complain whether it be rain or dry weather, any problems occur they will be bailed out by the Government! OK, they work hard but don't we all?

Farmers will spray crops with anything as long as they grow faster or fatter for more cash. Land management my foot! As for rising fuel costs, they have been allowed to use much cheaper red diesel unlike haulage companies etc for years.

Ban the pesticides, bring back the ladybirds!
Mr D Robertson, Broomside Terrace, Edinburgh

Fighting superbugs a priority for NHS
I AM writing to register my concern over your article "Superbugs linked to 375 deaths in Lothians hospitals", published on July 25.

Fighting Healthcare-Associated Infection is a corporate priority for NHS Lothian.

Readers should realise that the total given here refers to a timeframe of seven full years. In that time period, people over 60 – the group most susceptible to C Diff, which is a side-effect of treatment given for other serious illnesses – will have spent just under 7 million days and nights in Lothian's hospitals.

We have reviewed a number of cases in 2008 and found that over two-thirds of death certificates referring to C Diff contained information that might mislead.

Junior doctors are now receiving additional support over the process of completing death certificates.

I would like to thank your readers for helping to us prevent these infections by using the many gel points and handwashing facilities provided when visiting hospital.
Dr Alison McCallum, director of public health and health policy, NHS Lothian

Give us some flags . . nice heavy ones
I STRONGLY approve of Edinburgh City Council's plan to spend £1.3 million on flags – the kind used on the occasionally dangerous pavements around the city, definitely not the kind that flutter in the breeze!
David J Mackay, Camus Avenue, Edinburgh

Time for rules to go out window
HAVING been reacquainted with the daily commute during Edinburgh Festival time may I suggest the Tourist Agencies issue a free leaflet to visitors entitled "Suspension of Pedestrian Responsibilities for the Duration of the Festival".

The key points are:

• Red and green signals on traffic lights may be ignored. It is acceptable to wait for the red man to appear before crossing.

• When traversing a busy thoroughfare it is recommended the crossing takes no less than 45 seconds.

• If reproached by a local motorist, politely remind him that as you are on holiday you are therefore immune to any effects of collision, and that the evasive action he has just taken was therefore unnecessary.
Vince Macari, Oxgangs Road, Edinburgh







The full article contains 792 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 8:48 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 07/08/2008 12:16:50
Further to Mr Macari's point about pedestrians, we also need a leaflet for visiting drivers, just to make sure they know that turning right through a green light and finding themselves faced with a red light entitles them to come to a complete halt, and block the flow of traffic in four directions at once. In fact, if this can be achieved at a major junction with more than four flows of traffic, then they will automatically be awarded the freedom of the city, and a parade to the official execution place will be held in their honour.
2

Scallywag,

Edinburgh 07/08/2008 13:04:23
Here we go again, Jim Taylor and the never ending paranoia. Previously it would have been the labour crowd who would have been to blame, now SNP and Lib/Dems are in control they too are accused of having their noses in the trough. Who exactly does the man trust? If he has proof that brown envelopes are being passed then tell the police.
3

Skull,

East Lothian 07/08/2008 20:38:02
Scallywag, why don't you look to the questions being asked?




4

JWW,

Whitburn, West Lothian 08/08/2008 00:01:03
#2

Jim Taylor would only be suffering from paranoia if what he writes about is false.

As this project stinks like other current schemes in Edinburgh, such as Caltongate and the trams, my money is going on Jim Taylor making valid points in this instance.
5

Scallywag,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 01:51:35
#3 Skull - you are Jim's big mate on the taxi scene, you have the same delusions.

#4 What he writes with regard to poor conduct is rumour and nothing more. He is false because he has nothing to back up his claims.

I agree with Jim that the planners can be inconsistent in relation to silly things like lights and frontages but that doesn't mean they are bent.
6

JWW,

Whitburn, West Lothian 08/08/2008 09:42:10
Is it possible that people with a common purpose to Edinburgh Council, are writing comments on this website, to neutralise the likes of Jim Taylor and others?
7

Scallywag,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 10:32:26
JWW

No I'm just fed up of Jim and his constant whinging and paranoia. Your comments add the the belief that everyone is out to get him. Its all a big conspiracy and Jim, as the sole seeker of truth and justice, is being targetted by the dark forces of evil who are cleverly disguised as council officials.

Basically the guy can't get his own way regarding getting a taxi plate and thus the whole system is corrupt.

If you know Jim they have tried to go through the courts on the taxi issue and got told to go away with a flea in his ear. If he believes their is corruption and incompetence in the council then take it to the police and the ombudsman. Moaning on the EEN letters pages and posts achieves very little. As I said nothing but rumour and tittle tattle.
8

JWW,

Whitburn, West Lothian 09/08/2008 01:10:45
#7

Unlike you, I am not concerned that Jim Taylor is being allowed to voice his opinion. That is what democracy is all about.

However, what intrigues me is that the paranoia in this instance seems to lie with the person who is the most supportive of Edinburgh Council.

I wonder why?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.